Audit 358060

FY End
2024-09-30
Total Expended
$1.28M
Findings
10
Programs
5
Organization: Oslc Developments, Inc. (OR)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-06-04
Auditor: Jones & Roth PC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
563835 2024-002 Material Weakness - P
563836 2024-002 Material Weakness - P
563837 2024-002 Material Weakness - P
563838 2024-002 Material Weakness - P
563839 2024-002 Material Weakness - P
1140277 2024-002 Material Weakness - P
1140278 2024-002 Material Weakness - P
1140279 2024-002 Material Weakness - P
1140280 2024-002 Material Weakness - P
1140281 2024-002 Material Weakness - P

Contacts

Name Title Type
CKBCEK2UWFG7 Laurie Larson-Lewis Auditee
5414852711 Nadia Costa Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on this Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Both Rate Explanation: OSLC Developments, Inc. (ODI) has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance during the year ended September 30, 2024, for the Research Grant JCOIN LEAP SCHOLAR, Social Services Research and Demonstration – Connecting Kin, and MaryLee Allen Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program – CKIN-OPRE awards. For the ESSA Preschool Development Grants Birth through Five and the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds awards, ODI has used indirect cost rates of 17.4 percent and 12 percent, respectively, as approved by the pass-through entities. Expenditures reported on this Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: 2. Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on this Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Both Rate Explanation: OSLC Developments, Inc. (ODI) has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance during the year ended September 30, 2024, for the Research Grant JCOIN LEAP SCHOLAR, Social Services Research and Demonstration – Connecting Kin, and MaryLee Allen Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program – CKIN-OPRE awards. For the ESSA Preschool Development Grants Birth through Five and the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds awards, ODI has used indirect cost rates of 17.4 percent and 12 percent, respectively, as approved by the pass-through entities. OSLC Developments, Inc. (ODI) has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance during the year ended September 30, 2024, for the Research Grant JCOIN LEAP SCHOLAR, Social Services Research and Demonstration – Connecting Kin, and MaryLee Allen Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program – CKIN-OPRE awards. For the ESSA Preschool Development Grants Birth through Five and the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds awards, ODI has used indirect cost rates of 17.4 percent and 12 percent, respectively, as approved by the pass-through entities.
Title: 3. Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on this Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Both Rate Explanation: OSLC Developments, Inc. (ODI) has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance during the year ended September 30, 2024, for the Research Grant JCOIN LEAP SCHOLAR, Social Services Research and Demonstration – Connecting Kin, and MaryLee Allen Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program – CKIN-OPRE awards. For the ESSA Preschool Development Grants Birth through Five and the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds awards, ODI has used indirect cost rates of 17.4 percent and 12 percent, respectively, as approved by the pass-through entities. The accompanying Schedule includes the federal grant activity of ODI under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of ODI, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of ODI. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if applicable, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.

Finding Details

--Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance --Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200, subpart F) states it is the responsibility of the Organization’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order to identify federal awards and expenditures of federal awards and to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) that includes the total federal awards expended, as determined in accordance with § 200.502. --Condition and Context: While performing audit procedures, we identified two federal subawards that were not previously identified as such by management and had not been included on the SEFA for the year ended September 30, 2024 as originally presented for audit. The SEFA was subsequently corrected prior to issuance of the audit. The original SEFA was materially misstated due to the exclusion of expenditures under the federal subawards totaling $379,232. --Cause of Condition: Management failed to identify the agreements as federal subawards and the related expenditures for inclusion on the SEFA. --Effect of Condition: Failure to accurately identify all federal awards could cause the SEFA to be materially misstated and the performance of an insufficient major federal award programs audit. --Questioned Costs: None. --Repeat Finding: No. --Recommendation: We recommend the organization revisit its policies and procedures surrounding management’s review of grant and other contractual agreements to ensure all federal assistance, including subawards, are properly identified as such at the time the agreements are signed or received, and are properly included on the SEFA. --Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
--Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance --Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200, subpart F) states it is the responsibility of the Organization’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order to identify federal awards and expenditures of federal awards and to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) that includes the total federal awards expended, as determined in accordance with § 200.502. --Condition and Context: While performing audit procedures, we identified two federal subawards that were not previously identified as such by management and had not been included on the SEFA for the year ended September 30, 2024 as originally presented for audit. The SEFA was subsequently corrected prior to issuance of the audit. The original SEFA was materially misstated due to the exclusion of expenditures under the federal subawards totaling $379,232. --Cause of Condition: Management failed to identify the agreements as federal subawards and the related expenditures for inclusion on the SEFA. --Effect of Condition: Failure to accurately identify all federal awards could cause the SEFA to be materially misstated and the performance of an insufficient major federal award programs audit. --Questioned Costs: None. --Repeat Finding: No. --Recommendation: We recommend the organization revisit its policies and procedures surrounding management’s review of grant and other contractual agreements to ensure all federal assistance, including subawards, are properly identified as such at the time the agreements are signed or received, and are properly included on the SEFA. --Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
--Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance --Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200, subpart F) states it is the responsibility of the Organization’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order to identify federal awards and expenditures of federal awards and to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) that includes the total federal awards expended, as determined in accordance with § 200.502. --Condition and Context: While performing audit procedures, we identified two federal subawards that were not previously identified as such by management and had not been included on the SEFA for the year ended September 30, 2024 as originally presented for audit. The SEFA was subsequently corrected prior to issuance of the audit. The original SEFA was materially misstated due to the exclusion of expenditures under the federal subawards totaling $379,232. --Cause of Condition: Management failed to identify the agreements as federal subawards and the related expenditures for inclusion on the SEFA. --Effect of Condition: Failure to accurately identify all federal awards could cause the SEFA to be materially misstated and the performance of an insufficient major federal award programs audit. --Questioned Costs: None. --Repeat Finding: No. --Recommendation: We recommend the organization revisit its policies and procedures surrounding management’s review of grant and other contractual agreements to ensure all federal assistance, including subawards, are properly identified as such at the time the agreements are signed or received, and are properly included on the SEFA. --Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
--Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance --Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200, subpart F) states it is the responsibility of the Organization’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order to identify federal awards and expenditures of federal awards and to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) that includes the total federal awards expended, as determined in accordance with § 200.502. --Condition and Context: While performing audit procedures, we identified two federal subawards that were not previously identified as such by management and had not been included on the SEFA for the year ended September 30, 2024 as originally presented for audit. The SEFA was subsequently corrected prior to issuance of the audit. The original SEFA was materially misstated due to the exclusion of expenditures under the federal subawards totaling $379,232. --Cause of Condition: Management failed to identify the agreements as federal subawards and the related expenditures for inclusion on the SEFA. --Effect of Condition: Failure to accurately identify all federal awards could cause the SEFA to be materially misstated and the performance of an insufficient major federal award programs audit. --Questioned Costs: None. --Repeat Finding: No. --Recommendation: We recommend the organization revisit its policies and procedures surrounding management’s review of grant and other contractual agreements to ensure all federal assistance, including subawards, are properly identified as such at the time the agreements are signed or received, and are properly included on the SEFA. --Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
--Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance --Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200, subpart F) states it is the responsibility of the Organization’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order to identify federal awards and expenditures of federal awards and to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) that includes the total federal awards expended, as determined in accordance with § 200.502. --Condition and Context: While performing audit procedures, we identified two federal subawards that were not previously identified as such by management and had not been included on the SEFA for the year ended September 30, 2024 as originally presented for audit. The SEFA was subsequently corrected prior to issuance of the audit. The original SEFA was materially misstated due to the exclusion of expenditures under the federal subawards totaling $379,232. --Cause of Condition: Management failed to identify the agreements as federal subawards and the related expenditures for inclusion on the SEFA. --Effect of Condition: Failure to accurately identify all federal awards could cause the SEFA to be materially misstated and the performance of an insufficient major federal award programs audit. --Questioned Costs: None. --Repeat Finding: No. --Recommendation: We recommend the organization revisit its policies and procedures surrounding management’s review of grant and other contractual agreements to ensure all federal assistance, including subawards, are properly identified as such at the time the agreements are signed or received, and are properly included on the SEFA. --Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
--Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance --Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200, subpart F) states it is the responsibility of the Organization’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order to identify federal awards and expenditures of federal awards and to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) that includes the total federal awards expended, as determined in accordance with § 200.502. --Condition and Context: While performing audit procedures, we identified two federal subawards that were not previously identified as such by management and had not been included on the SEFA for the year ended September 30, 2024 as originally presented for audit. The SEFA was subsequently corrected prior to issuance of the audit. The original SEFA was materially misstated due to the exclusion of expenditures under the federal subawards totaling $379,232. --Cause of Condition: Management failed to identify the agreements as federal subawards and the related expenditures for inclusion on the SEFA. --Effect of Condition: Failure to accurately identify all federal awards could cause the SEFA to be materially misstated and the performance of an insufficient major federal award programs audit. --Questioned Costs: None. --Repeat Finding: No. --Recommendation: We recommend the organization revisit its policies and procedures surrounding management’s review of grant and other contractual agreements to ensure all federal assistance, including subawards, are properly identified as such at the time the agreements are signed or received, and are properly included on the SEFA. --Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
--Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance --Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200, subpart F) states it is the responsibility of the Organization’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order to identify federal awards and expenditures of federal awards and to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) that includes the total federal awards expended, as determined in accordance with § 200.502. --Condition and Context: While performing audit procedures, we identified two federal subawards that were not previously identified as such by management and had not been included on the SEFA for the year ended September 30, 2024 as originally presented for audit. The SEFA was subsequently corrected prior to issuance of the audit. The original SEFA was materially misstated due to the exclusion of expenditures under the federal subawards totaling $379,232. --Cause of Condition: Management failed to identify the agreements as federal subawards and the related expenditures for inclusion on the SEFA. --Effect of Condition: Failure to accurately identify all federal awards could cause the SEFA to be materially misstated and the performance of an insufficient major federal award programs audit. --Questioned Costs: None. --Repeat Finding: No. --Recommendation: We recommend the organization revisit its policies and procedures surrounding management’s review of grant and other contractual agreements to ensure all federal assistance, including subawards, are properly identified as such at the time the agreements are signed or received, and are properly included on the SEFA. --Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
--Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance --Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200, subpart F) states it is the responsibility of the Organization’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order to identify federal awards and expenditures of federal awards and to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) that includes the total federal awards expended, as determined in accordance with § 200.502. --Condition and Context: While performing audit procedures, we identified two federal subawards that were not previously identified as such by management and had not been included on the SEFA for the year ended September 30, 2024 as originally presented for audit. The SEFA was subsequently corrected prior to issuance of the audit. The original SEFA was materially misstated due to the exclusion of expenditures under the federal subawards totaling $379,232. --Cause of Condition: Management failed to identify the agreements as federal subawards and the related expenditures for inclusion on the SEFA. --Effect of Condition: Failure to accurately identify all federal awards could cause the SEFA to be materially misstated and the performance of an insufficient major federal award programs audit. --Questioned Costs: None. --Repeat Finding: No. --Recommendation: We recommend the organization revisit its policies and procedures surrounding management’s review of grant and other contractual agreements to ensure all federal assistance, including subawards, are properly identified as such at the time the agreements are signed or received, and are properly included on the SEFA. --Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
--Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance --Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200, subpart F) states it is the responsibility of the Organization’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order to identify federal awards and expenditures of federal awards and to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) that includes the total federal awards expended, as determined in accordance with § 200.502. --Condition and Context: While performing audit procedures, we identified two federal subawards that were not previously identified as such by management and had not been included on the SEFA for the year ended September 30, 2024 as originally presented for audit. The SEFA was subsequently corrected prior to issuance of the audit. The original SEFA was materially misstated due to the exclusion of expenditures under the federal subawards totaling $379,232. --Cause of Condition: Management failed to identify the agreements as federal subawards and the related expenditures for inclusion on the SEFA. --Effect of Condition: Failure to accurately identify all federal awards could cause the SEFA to be materially misstated and the performance of an insufficient major federal award programs audit. --Questioned Costs: None. --Repeat Finding: No. --Recommendation: We recommend the organization revisit its policies and procedures surrounding management’s review of grant and other contractual agreements to ensure all federal assistance, including subawards, are properly identified as such at the time the agreements are signed or received, and are properly included on the SEFA. --Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
--Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance --Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200, subpart F) states it is the responsibility of the Organization’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order to identify federal awards and expenditures of federal awards and to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) that includes the total federal awards expended, as determined in accordance with § 200.502. --Condition and Context: While performing audit procedures, we identified two federal subawards that were not previously identified as such by management and had not been included on the SEFA for the year ended September 30, 2024 as originally presented for audit. The SEFA was subsequently corrected prior to issuance of the audit. The original SEFA was materially misstated due to the exclusion of expenditures under the federal subawards totaling $379,232. --Cause of Condition: Management failed to identify the agreements as federal subawards and the related expenditures for inclusion on the SEFA. --Effect of Condition: Failure to accurately identify all federal awards could cause the SEFA to be materially misstated and the performance of an insufficient major federal award programs audit. --Questioned Costs: None. --Repeat Finding: No. --Recommendation: We recommend the organization revisit its policies and procedures surrounding management’s review of grant and other contractual agreements to ensure all federal assistance, including subawards, are properly identified as such at the time the agreements are signed or received, and are properly included on the SEFA. --Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.