Audit 357755

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$1.27M
Findings
6
Programs
5
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-06-02

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
562126 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
562127 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
562128 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
1138568 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
1138569 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
1138570 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB

Contacts

Name Title Type
KNP3JEK96X49 Scott Bohn Auditee
7172361059 Michael Mark Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association did not elect to use the 15% de minimis indirect cost rate. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: NOTE 3 – DE MINIMUS RATE FOR INDIRECT COSTS The Association did not elect to use the de minimis rate for indirect costs. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association, it is not intended to and does not present the assets, liabilities, or changes in net assets of Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association.
Title: NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association did not elect to use the 15% de minimis indirect cost rate. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: NOTE 3 – DE MINIMUS RATE FOR INDIRECT COSTS The Association did not elect to use the de minimis rate for indirect costs. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association did not elect to use the 15% de minimis indirect cost rate.
Title: NOTE 3 – DE MINIMUS RATE FOR INDIRECT COSTS Accounting Policies: NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association did not elect to use the 15% de minimis indirect cost rate. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: NOTE 3 – DE MINIMUS RATE FOR INDIRECT COSTS The Association did not elect to use the de minimis rate for indirect costs. The Association did not elect to use the de minimis rate for indirect costs.

Finding Details

#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Authorization and Approval Procedural Controls Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program ALN #16.738 Criteria Internal controls are intended to prevent errors and irregularities, identify problems and ensure that corrective action is taken. A member of Association management should review timesheets and payroll records as the foundation of authorization and approval procedures over payroll. Condition During the course of the audit, it was determined that management did not consistently perform a review of timesheets completed by their subordinates. Cause The cause is human error. Effect The potential effects of not authorizing payroll records could include an over or understatement of salary expenses. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to test work performed for four (4) pay periods, with six (6) employees selected per pay period. No approval was noted on a total of three (3) employee timesheets tested across two (2) of the pay periods selected. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend the Executive Director review timesheets for every employee for each pay period, and sign off indicating this review has occurred. View of Responsible Official After reviewing the recommendation from Hamilton & Musser, the Association agrees that the Executive Director will carefully review and sign off on time sheets for each employee during every pay period to confirm the review. This has and will continue to be the custom and practice of the Association.
#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Authorization and Approval Procedural Controls Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program ALN #16.738 Criteria Internal controls are intended to prevent errors and irregularities, identify problems and ensure that corrective action is taken. A member of Association management should review timesheets and payroll records as the foundation of authorization and approval procedures over payroll. Condition During the course of the audit, it was determined that management did not consistently perform a review of timesheets completed by their subordinates. Cause The cause is human error. Effect The potential effects of not authorizing payroll records could include an over or understatement of salary expenses. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to test work performed for four (4) pay periods, with six (6) employees selected per pay period. No approval was noted on a total of three (3) employee timesheets tested across two (2) of the pay periods selected. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend the Executive Director review timesheets for every employee for each pay period, and sign off indicating this review has occurred. View of Responsible Official After reviewing the recommendation from Hamilton & Musser, the Association agrees that the Executive Director will carefully review and sign off on time sheets for each employee during every pay period to confirm the review. This has and will continue to be the custom and practice of the Association.
#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Authorization and Approval Procedural Controls Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program ALN #16.738 Criteria Internal controls are intended to prevent errors and irregularities, identify problems and ensure that corrective action is taken. A member of Association management should review timesheets and payroll records as the foundation of authorization and approval procedures over payroll. Condition During the course of the audit, it was determined that management did not consistently perform a review of timesheets completed by their subordinates. Cause The cause is human error. Effect The potential effects of not authorizing payroll records could include an over or understatement of salary expenses. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to test work performed for four (4) pay periods, with six (6) employees selected per pay period. No approval was noted on a total of three (3) employee timesheets tested across two (2) of the pay periods selected. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend the Executive Director review timesheets for every employee for each pay period, and sign off indicating this review has occurred. View of Responsible Official After reviewing the recommendation from Hamilton & Musser, the Association agrees that the Executive Director will carefully review and sign off on time sheets for each employee during every pay period to confirm the review. This has and will continue to be the custom and practice of the Association.
#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Authorization and Approval Procedural Controls Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program ALN #16.738 Criteria Internal controls are intended to prevent errors and irregularities, identify problems and ensure that corrective action is taken. A member of Association management should review timesheets and payroll records as the foundation of authorization and approval procedures over payroll. Condition During the course of the audit, it was determined that management did not consistently perform a review of timesheets completed by their subordinates. Cause The cause is human error. Effect The potential effects of not authorizing payroll records could include an over or understatement of salary expenses. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to test work performed for four (4) pay periods, with six (6) employees selected per pay period. No approval was noted on a total of three (3) employee timesheets tested across two (2) of the pay periods selected. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend the Executive Director review timesheets for every employee for each pay period, and sign off indicating this review has occurred. View of Responsible Official After reviewing the recommendation from Hamilton & Musser, the Association agrees that the Executive Director will carefully review and sign off on time sheets for each employee during every pay period to confirm the review. This has and will continue to be the custom and practice of the Association.
#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Authorization and Approval Procedural Controls Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program ALN #16.738 Criteria Internal controls are intended to prevent errors and irregularities, identify problems and ensure that corrective action is taken. A member of Association management should review timesheets and payroll records as the foundation of authorization and approval procedures over payroll. Condition During the course of the audit, it was determined that management did not consistently perform a review of timesheets completed by their subordinates. Cause The cause is human error. Effect The potential effects of not authorizing payroll records could include an over or understatement of salary expenses. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to test work performed for four (4) pay periods, with six (6) employees selected per pay period. No approval was noted on a total of three (3) employee timesheets tested across two (2) of the pay periods selected. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend the Executive Director review timesheets for every employee for each pay period, and sign off indicating this review has occurred. View of Responsible Official After reviewing the recommendation from Hamilton & Musser, the Association agrees that the Executive Director will carefully review and sign off on time sheets for each employee during every pay period to confirm the review. This has and will continue to be the custom and practice of the Association.
#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Authorization and Approval Procedural Controls Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program ALN #16.738 Criteria Internal controls are intended to prevent errors and irregularities, identify problems and ensure that corrective action is taken. A member of Association management should review timesheets and payroll records as the foundation of authorization and approval procedures over payroll. Condition During the course of the audit, it was determined that management did not consistently perform a review of timesheets completed by their subordinates. Cause The cause is human error. Effect The potential effects of not authorizing payroll records could include an over or understatement of salary expenses. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to test work performed for four (4) pay periods, with six (6) employees selected per pay period. No approval was noted on a total of three (3) employee timesheets tested across two (2) of the pay periods selected. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend the Executive Director review timesheets for every employee for each pay period, and sign off indicating this review has occurred. View of Responsible Official After reviewing the recommendation from Hamilton & Musser, the Association agrees that the Executive Director will carefully review and sign off on time sheets for each employee during every pay period to confirm the review. This has and will continue to be the custom and practice of the Association.