Audit 357498

FY End
2024-08-31
Total Expended
$923,094
Findings
4
Programs
15
Organization: New Jersey Audubon Society (NJ)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-05-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
561839 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
561840 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
1138281 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
1138282 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L

Programs

Contacts

Name Title Type
TMZMMPS67GP1 Mark Carmichael Auditee
9083967380 Brad Caruso Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Society has not previously received a negotiated indirect cost rate and has elected to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowable under Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of New Jersey Audubon Society (the "Society") under programs of the federal government for the year ended August 31, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ("Uniform Guidance"). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Society, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Society.
Title: 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Society has not previously received a negotiated indirect cost rate and has elected to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowable under Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: 3. INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Society has not previously received a negotiated indirect cost rate and has elected to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowable under Uniform Guidance. The Society has not previously received a negotiated indirect cost rate and has elected to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowable under Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Assistance Listing Number: 10.902; 15.670 Program Name: Soil and Water Conservation; Adaptive Science Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”); United States Department of the Interior (“DOI”) Repeat Finding: No Criteria Per the grant agreement, the grantee is required to submit periodic financial reports. Condition and Context For a sample of 6 reports tested (3 from each Federal program), we noted that 5 of the reports were submitted past the required deadline as noted in the grant agreement. We also noted all 6 reports lacked sufficient documentation of review and approval prior to submission. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Cause The Society had turnover in staff and required additional time to complete the filings. Reviews and approvals were performed via email, messenger application, and verbal communication, and documentation was not maintained after closure of email accounts assigned to former staff. Questioned Costs None noted. Effect or Potential Effect The Society was not in compliance with the timeliness of reporting requirements of the funding agencies. Funds could be held or not disbursed timely from the funding source due to the late filing of reports, which could result in cash flow problems for the Society. Insufficient review and approval could result in errors or omissions going undetected. Recommendation The Society should allocate resources as necessary to aid in compliance and implement internal controls to facilitate timely filings of reports. Review and approval controls should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials The Society has limited staff resources and has relied on essential staff to review and submit reports. As a result of the audit finding, the Society has established a process for documenting deadlines, reviewing and approving programmatic and financial reports before submission, and archival of documentation in shared digital folders.
Assistance Listing Number: 10.902; 15.670 Program Name: Soil and Water Conservation; Adaptive Science Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”); United States Department of the Interior (“DOI”) Repeat Finding: No Criteria Per the grant agreement, the grantee is required to submit periodic financial reports. Condition and Context For a sample of 6 reports tested (3 from each Federal program), we noted that 5 of the reports were submitted past the required deadline as noted in the grant agreement. We also noted all 6 reports lacked sufficient documentation of review and approval prior to submission. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Cause The Society had turnover in staff and required additional time to complete the filings. Reviews and approvals were performed via email, messenger application, and verbal communication, and documentation was not maintained after closure of email accounts assigned to former staff. Questioned Costs None noted. Effect or Potential Effect The Society was not in compliance with the timeliness of reporting requirements of the funding agencies. Funds could be held or not disbursed timely from the funding source due to the late filing of reports, which could result in cash flow problems for the Society. Insufficient review and approval could result in errors or omissions going undetected. Recommendation The Society should allocate resources as necessary to aid in compliance and implement internal controls to facilitate timely filings of reports. Review and approval controls should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials The Society has limited staff resources and has relied on essential staff to review and submit reports. As a result of the audit finding, the Society has established a process for documenting deadlines, reviewing and approving programmatic and financial reports before submission, and archival of documentation in shared digital folders.
Assistance Listing Number: 10.902; 15.670 Program Name: Soil and Water Conservation; Adaptive Science Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”); United States Department of the Interior (“DOI”) Repeat Finding: No Criteria Per the grant agreement, the grantee is required to submit periodic financial reports. Condition and Context For a sample of 6 reports tested (3 from each Federal program), we noted that 5 of the reports were submitted past the required deadline as noted in the grant agreement. We also noted all 6 reports lacked sufficient documentation of review and approval prior to submission. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Cause The Society had turnover in staff and required additional time to complete the filings. Reviews and approvals were performed via email, messenger application, and verbal communication, and documentation was not maintained after closure of email accounts assigned to former staff. Questioned Costs None noted. Effect or Potential Effect The Society was not in compliance with the timeliness of reporting requirements of the funding agencies. Funds could be held or not disbursed timely from the funding source due to the late filing of reports, which could result in cash flow problems for the Society. Insufficient review and approval could result in errors or omissions going undetected. Recommendation The Society should allocate resources as necessary to aid in compliance and implement internal controls to facilitate timely filings of reports. Review and approval controls should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials The Society has limited staff resources and has relied on essential staff to review and submit reports. As a result of the audit finding, the Society has established a process for documenting deadlines, reviewing and approving programmatic and financial reports before submission, and archival of documentation in shared digital folders.
Assistance Listing Number: 10.902; 15.670 Program Name: Soil and Water Conservation; Adaptive Science Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”); United States Department of the Interior (“DOI”) Repeat Finding: No Criteria Per the grant agreement, the grantee is required to submit periodic financial reports. Condition and Context For a sample of 6 reports tested (3 from each Federal program), we noted that 5 of the reports were submitted past the required deadline as noted in the grant agreement. We also noted all 6 reports lacked sufficient documentation of review and approval prior to submission. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Cause The Society had turnover in staff and required additional time to complete the filings. Reviews and approvals were performed via email, messenger application, and verbal communication, and documentation was not maintained after closure of email accounts assigned to former staff. Questioned Costs None noted. Effect or Potential Effect The Society was not in compliance with the timeliness of reporting requirements of the funding agencies. Funds could be held or not disbursed timely from the funding source due to the late filing of reports, which could result in cash flow problems for the Society. Insufficient review and approval could result in errors or omissions going undetected. Recommendation The Society should allocate resources as necessary to aid in compliance and implement internal controls to facilitate timely filings of reports. Review and approval controls should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials The Society has limited staff resources and has relied on essential staff to review and submit reports. As a result of the audit finding, the Society has established a process for documenting deadlines, reviewing and approving programmatic and financial reports before submission, and archival of documentation in shared digital folders.