Audit 357239

FY End
2024-08-31
Total Expended
$1.12M
Findings
10
Programs
16
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-05-27

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
561631 2024-001 Material Weakness - I
561632 2024-001 Material Weakness - I
561633 2024-001 Material Weakness - I
561634 2024-001 Material Weakness - I
561635 2024-001 Material Weakness - I
1138073 2024-001 Material Weakness - I
1138074 2024-001 Material Weakness - I
1138075 2024-001 Material Weakness - I
1138076 2024-001 Material Weakness - I
1138077 2024-001 Material Weakness - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
Y8CWJRLRJAL8 McKenzie Boyd Auditee
3604361323 Courtney Amonsen Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note - 1 Basis of Accounting Accounting Policies: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared on the same basis of accounting as the Darrington School District's financial statements. The district uses hte modified accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures represent only the federally funded portions of the program. District records should be consulted to determine amounts expended or matched from non-federal sources. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Darrington School District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The district used the federal restricted rate of 4.51% The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared on the same basis of accounting as the Darrington School District's financial statements. The district uses hte modified accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures represent only the federally funded portions of the program. District records should be consulted to determine amounts expended or matched from non-federal sources.
Title: Note - 2 Federal De Minimis Indirect Rate Accounting Policies: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared on the same basis of accounting as the Darrington School District's financial statements. The district uses hte modified accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures represent only the federally funded portions of the program. District records should be consulted to determine amounts expended or matched from non-federal sources. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Darrington School District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The district used the federal restricted rate of 4.51% The Darrington School District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The district used the federal restricted rate of 4.51%
Title: Note - 3 Program Costs/Matching Contributions Accounting Policies: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared on the same basis of accounting as the Darrington School District's financial statements. The district uses hte modified accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures represent only the federally funded portions of the program. District records should be consulted to determine amounts expended or matched from non-federal sources. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Darrington School District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The district used the federal restricted rate of 4.51% The amounts shown as current year expenses represent only the federal grant portion of the program costs. Entire program costs, including the district's local matching share, may be more than shown. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in the OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, or the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Note - 4 Noncash Awards Accounting Policies: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared on the same basis of accounting as the Darrington School District's financial statements. The district uses hte modified accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures represent only the federally funded portions of the program. District records should be consulted to determine amounts expended or matched from non-federal sources. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Darrington School District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The district used the federal restricted rate of 4.51% The amount of commodities reported on the schedule is the value of commodities distributed to the district during the current year and priced as prescribed by OSPI.
Title: Note - 5 Schoolwide Programs Accounting Policies: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared on the same basis of accounting as the Darrington School District's financial statements. The district uses hte modified accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures represent only the federally funded portions of the program. District records should be consulted to determine amounts expended or matched from non-federal sources. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Darrington School District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The district used the federal restricted rate of 4.51% The district operates a "schoolwide program" in one elementary building. Using federal funding, schoolwide programs are desgined to upgrade an entire educational program within a school for all students, rather than limit services to certain targeted students. The following federal program amounts were expended by the district in its schoolwide program: Title I (84.001) $126,735; Title II A (84.367) $18,819; and Title IV A (84.424) $10,868.
Title: Note - 6 Small Rural Schools Achievement (SRA) Accounting Policies: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared on the same basis of accounting as the Darrington School District's financial statements. The district uses hte modified accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures represent only the federally funded portions of the program. District records should be consulted to determine amounts expended or matched from non-federal sources. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Darrington School District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The district used the federal restricted rate of 4.51% As allowed by federal regulations, the district expended $42,256 from its Small Rural Shcools Achievement (SRA) Alternative Uses of Funds Program (84.358) for activities of the Student Support and Academic Achievement Enrichment Program (84.424).

Finding Details

2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 School Breakfast Program 10.555 National School Lunch Program 10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Federal Grantor Name: Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program and Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Program. These programs provide free and reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $383,210 to administer these programs during the 2023–2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. When using federal funds to purchase goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive federal, state or local laws by obtaining quotes or following a competitive bidding process, depending on the estimated cost of the purchase. Federal regulations and District policy require the District to solicit sealed bids or competitive proposals for personal services more than $250,000. The District may procure goods using noncompetitive proposals when the good is only available from a single source. The District must also keep documentation supporting the procurement method used. Description of Condition Our audit found the District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, for two food and dairy vendors, the District did not follow its policy by obtaining at least three quotes or have documentation to support noncompetitive procurement for goods. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Because the District is in a remote location, employees used their knowledge and previous experience to select food vendors that could deliver the specific products they needed timely. Staff did not know they needed to retain written documentation to show how they complied with District policies when selecting vendors. Effect of Condition The District paid one vendor $57,635 and a second vendor $11,809 using federal program funds without documenting it obtained three quotes as required by District policy. Without competitively procuring these purchases, the District cannot demonstrate it received the best price and complied with federal procurement requirements and its own policy. Recommendation We recommend the District: • Dedicate the necessary time and resources to ensure all staff responsible for procuring goods and services are fully familiar with federal procurement requirements and District policy • Follow its procurement policy and federal regulations for services and purchases made with federal funds • Maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements District’s Response The Darrington School District acknowledges that we did not retain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements for the child nutrition cluster. However, we dispute the auditors’ assertion that we did not comply with federal procurement requirements. The district sought quotes from at least three vendors via phone calls per our policy. Unfortunately, several vendors were either unable to provide the products specified in our request for quotes or do not deliver to our area, and therefore did not provide written quotes. The district documented the quotes from responsive vendors. In the future, the district will document all efforts to obtain quotes from both responsive and nonresponsive vendors. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. As noted in the finding above and acknowledged in the District’s response, the District did not maintain documentation to show it obtained three quotes or documentation to show all other potential vendors were unwilling to provide quotes. Therefore, we could not verify that it complied with procurement requirements. We reaffirm our finding and will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR 200, Uniform Guidance, section 319, Competition, establishes the requirement that all procurement transactions with Federal funds be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with standards of this section. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring goods and services, including noncompetitive procurement.
2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 School Breakfast Program 10.555 National School Lunch Program 10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Federal Grantor Name: Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program and Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Program. These programs provide free and reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $383,210 to administer these programs during the 2023–2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. When using federal funds to purchase goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive federal, state or local laws by obtaining quotes or following a competitive bidding process, depending on the estimated cost of the purchase. Federal regulations and District policy require the District to solicit sealed bids or competitive proposals for personal services more than $250,000. The District may procure goods using noncompetitive proposals when the good is only available from a single source. The District must also keep documentation supporting the procurement method used. Description of Condition Our audit found the District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, for two food and dairy vendors, the District did not follow its policy by obtaining at least three quotes or have documentation to support noncompetitive procurement for goods. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Because the District is in a remote location, employees used their knowledge and previous experience to select food vendors that could deliver the specific products they needed timely. Staff did not know they needed to retain written documentation to show how they complied with District policies when selecting vendors. Effect of Condition The District paid one vendor $57,635 and a second vendor $11,809 using federal program funds without documenting it obtained three quotes as required by District policy. Without competitively procuring these purchases, the District cannot demonstrate it received the best price and complied with federal procurement requirements and its own policy. Recommendation We recommend the District: • Dedicate the necessary time and resources to ensure all staff responsible for procuring goods and services are fully familiar with federal procurement requirements and District policy • Follow its procurement policy and federal regulations for services and purchases made with federal funds • Maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements District’s Response The Darrington School District acknowledges that we did not retain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements for the child nutrition cluster. However, we dispute the auditors’ assertion that we did not comply with federal procurement requirements. The district sought quotes from at least three vendors via phone calls per our policy. Unfortunately, several vendors were either unable to provide the products specified in our request for quotes or do not deliver to our area, and therefore did not provide written quotes. The district documented the quotes from responsive vendors. In the future, the district will document all efforts to obtain quotes from both responsive and nonresponsive vendors. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. As noted in the finding above and acknowledged in the District’s response, the District did not maintain documentation to show it obtained three quotes or documentation to show all other potential vendors were unwilling to provide quotes. Therefore, we could not verify that it complied with procurement requirements. We reaffirm our finding and will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR 200, Uniform Guidance, section 319, Competition, establishes the requirement that all procurement transactions with Federal funds be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with standards of this section. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring goods and services, including noncompetitive procurement.
2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 School Breakfast Program 10.555 National School Lunch Program 10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Federal Grantor Name: Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program and Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Program. These programs provide free and reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $383,210 to administer these programs during the 2023–2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. When using federal funds to purchase goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive federal, state or local laws by obtaining quotes or following a competitive bidding process, depending on the estimated cost of the purchase. Federal regulations and District policy require the District to solicit sealed bids or competitive proposals for personal services more than $250,000. The District may procure goods using noncompetitive proposals when the good is only available from a single source. The District must also keep documentation supporting the procurement method used. Description of Condition Our audit found the District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, for two food and dairy vendors, the District did not follow its policy by obtaining at least three quotes or have documentation to support noncompetitive procurement for goods. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Because the District is in a remote location, employees used their knowledge and previous experience to select food vendors that could deliver the specific products they needed timely. Staff did not know they needed to retain written documentation to show how they complied with District policies when selecting vendors. Effect of Condition The District paid one vendor $57,635 and a second vendor $11,809 using federal program funds without documenting it obtained three quotes as required by District policy. Without competitively procuring these purchases, the District cannot demonstrate it received the best price and complied with federal procurement requirements and its own policy. Recommendation We recommend the District: • Dedicate the necessary time and resources to ensure all staff responsible for procuring goods and services are fully familiar with federal procurement requirements and District policy • Follow its procurement policy and federal regulations for services and purchases made with federal funds • Maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements District’s Response The Darrington School District acknowledges that we did not retain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements for the child nutrition cluster. However, we dispute the auditors’ assertion that we did not comply with federal procurement requirements. The district sought quotes from at least three vendors via phone calls per our policy. Unfortunately, several vendors were either unable to provide the products specified in our request for quotes or do not deliver to our area, and therefore did not provide written quotes. The district documented the quotes from responsive vendors. In the future, the district will document all efforts to obtain quotes from both responsive and nonresponsive vendors. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. As noted in the finding above and acknowledged in the District’s response, the District did not maintain documentation to show it obtained three quotes or documentation to show all other potential vendors were unwilling to provide quotes. Therefore, we could not verify that it complied with procurement requirements. We reaffirm our finding and will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR 200, Uniform Guidance, section 319, Competition, establishes the requirement that all procurement transactions with Federal funds be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with standards of this section. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring goods and services, including noncompetitive procurement.
2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 School Breakfast Program 10.555 National School Lunch Program 10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Federal Grantor Name: Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program and Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Program. These programs provide free and reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $383,210 to administer these programs during the 2023–2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. When using federal funds to purchase goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive federal, state or local laws by obtaining quotes or following a competitive bidding process, depending on the estimated cost of the purchase. Federal regulations and District policy require the District to solicit sealed bids or competitive proposals for personal services more than $250,000. The District may procure goods using noncompetitive proposals when the good is only available from a single source. The District must also keep documentation supporting the procurement method used. Description of Condition Our audit found the District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, for two food and dairy vendors, the District did not follow its policy by obtaining at least three quotes or have documentation to support noncompetitive procurement for goods. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Because the District is in a remote location, employees used their knowledge and previous experience to select food vendors that could deliver the specific products they needed timely. Staff did not know they needed to retain written documentation to show how they complied with District policies when selecting vendors. Effect of Condition The District paid one vendor $57,635 and a second vendor $11,809 using federal program funds without documenting it obtained three quotes as required by District policy. Without competitively procuring these purchases, the District cannot demonstrate it received the best price and complied with federal procurement requirements and its own policy. Recommendation We recommend the District: • Dedicate the necessary time and resources to ensure all staff responsible for procuring goods and services are fully familiar with federal procurement requirements and District policy • Follow its procurement policy and federal regulations for services and purchases made with federal funds • Maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements District’s Response The Darrington School District acknowledges that we did not retain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements for the child nutrition cluster. However, we dispute the auditors’ assertion that we did not comply with federal procurement requirements. The district sought quotes from at least three vendors via phone calls per our policy. Unfortunately, several vendors were either unable to provide the products specified in our request for quotes or do not deliver to our area, and therefore did not provide written quotes. The district documented the quotes from responsive vendors. In the future, the district will document all efforts to obtain quotes from both responsive and nonresponsive vendors. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. As noted in the finding above and acknowledged in the District’s response, the District did not maintain documentation to show it obtained three quotes or documentation to show all other potential vendors were unwilling to provide quotes. Therefore, we could not verify that it complied with procurement requirements. We reaffirm our finding and will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR 200, Uniform Guidance, section 319, Competition, establishes the requirement that all procurement transactions with Federal funds be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with standards of this section. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring goods and services, including noncompetitive procurement.
2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 School Breakfast Program 10.555 National School Lunch Program 10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Federal Grantor Name: Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program and Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Program. These programs provide free and reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $383,210 to administer these programs during the 2023–2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. When using federal funds to purchase goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive federal, state or local laws by obtaining quotes or following a competitive bidding process, depending on the estimated cost of the purchase. Federal regulations and District policy require the District to solicit sealed bids or competitive proposals for personal services more than $250,000. The District may procure goods using noncompetitive proposals when the good is only available from a single source. The District must also keep documentation supporting the procurement method used. Description of Condition Our audit found the District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, for two food and dairy vendors, the District did not follow its policy by obtaining at least three quotes or have documentation to support noncompetitive procurement for goods. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Because the District is in a remote location, employees used their knowledge and previous experience to select food vendors that could deliver the specific products they needed timely. Staff did not know they needed to retain written documentation to show how they complied with District policies when selecting vendors. Effect of Condition The District paid one vendor $57,635 and a second vendor $11,809 using federal program funds without documenting it obtained three quotes as required by District policy. Without competitively procuring these purchases, the District cannot demonstrate it received the best price and complied with federal procurement requirements and its own policy. Recommendation We recommend the District: • Dedicate the necessary time and resources to ensure all staff responsible for procuring goods and services are fully familiar with federal procurement requirements and District policy • Follow its procurement policy and federal regulations for services and purchases made with federal funds • Maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements District’s Response The Darrington School District acknowledges that we did not retain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements for the child nutrition cluster. However, we dispute the auditors’ assertion that we did not comply with federal procurement requirements. The district sought quotes from at least three vendors via phone calls per our policy. Unfortunately, several vendors were either unable to provide the products specified in our request for quotes or do not deliver to our area, and therefore did not provide written quotes. The district documented the quotes from responsive vendors. In the future, the district will document all efforts to obtain quotes from both responsive and nonresponsive vendors. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. As noted in the finding above and acknowledged in the District’s response, the District did not maintain documentation to show it obtained three quotes or documentation to show all other potential vendors were unwilling to provide quotes. Therefore, we could not verify that it complied with procurement requirements. We reaffirm our finding and will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR 200, Uniform Guidance, section 319, Competition, establishes the requirement that all procurement transactions with Federal funds be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with standards of this section. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring goods and services, including noncompetitive procurement.
2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 School Breakfast Program 10.555 National School Lunch Program 10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Federal Grantor Name: Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program and Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Program. These programs provide free and reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $383,210 to administer these programs during the 2023–2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. When using federal funds to purchase goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive federal, state or local laws by obtaining quotes or following a competitive bidding process, depending on the estimated cost of the purchase. Federal regulations and District policy require the District to solicit sealed bids or competitive proposals for personal services more than $250,000. The District may procure goods using noncompetitive proposals when the good is only available from a single source. The District must also keep documentation supporting the procurement method used. Description of Condition Our audit found the District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, for two food and dairy vendors, the District did not follow its policy by obtaining at least three quotes or have documentation to support noncompetitive procurement for goods. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Because the District is in a remote location, employees used their knowledge and previous experience to select food vendors that could deliver the specific products they needed timely. Staff did not know they needed to retain written documentation to show how they complied with District policies when selecting vendors. Effect of Condition The District paid one vendor $57,635 and a second vendor $11,809 using federal program funds without documenting it obtained three quotes as required by District policy. Without competitively procuring these purchases, the District cannot demonstrate it received the best price and complied with federal procurement requirements and its own policy. Recommendation We recommend the District: • Dedicate the necessary time and resources to ensure all staff responsible for procuring goods and services are fully familiar with federal procurement requirements and District policy • Follow its procurement policy and federal regulations for services and purchases made with federal funds • Maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements District’s Response The Darrington School District acknowledges that we did not retain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements for the child nutrition cluster. However, we dispute the auditors’ assertion that we did not comply with federal procurement requirements. The district sought quotes from at least three vendors via phone calls per our policy. Unfortunately, several vendors were either unable to provide the products specified in our request for quotes or do not deliver to our area, and therefore did not provide written quotes. The district documented the quotes from responsive vendors. In the future, the district will document all efforts to obtain quotes from both responsive and nonresponsive vendors. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. As noted in the finding above and acknowledged in the District’s response, the District did not maintain documentation to show it obtained three quotes or documentation to show all other potential vendors were unwilling to provide quotes. Therefore, we could not verify that it complied with procurement requirements. We reaffirm our finding and will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR 200, Uniform Guidance, section 319, Competition, establishes the requirement that all procurement transactions with Federal funds be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with standards of this section. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring goods and services, including noncompetitive procurement.
2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 School Breakfast Program 10.555 National School Lunch Program 10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Federal Grantor Name: Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program and Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Program. These programs provide free and reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $383,210 to administer these programs during the 2023–2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. When using federal funds to purchase goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive federal, state or local laws by obtaining quotes or following a competitive bidding process, depending on the estimated cost of the purchase. Federal regulations and District policy require the District to solicit sealed bids or competitive proposals for personal services more than $250,000. The District may procure goods using noncompetitive proposals when the good is only available from a single source. The District must also keep documentation supporting the procurement method used. Description of Condition Our audit found the District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, for two food and dairy vendors, the District did not follow its policy by obtaining at least three quotes or have documentation to support noncompetitive procurement for goods. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Because the District is in a remote location, employees used their knowledge and previous experience to select food vendors that could deliver the specific products they needed timely. Staff did not know they needed to retain written documentation to show how they complied with District policies when selecting vendors. Effect of Condition The District paid one vendor $57,635 and a second vendor $11,809 using federal program funds without documenting it obtained three quotes as required by District policy. Without competitively procuring these purchases, the District cannot demonstrate it received the best price and complied with federal procurement requirements and its own policy. Recommendation We recommend the District: • Dedicate the necessary time and resources to ensure all staff responsible for procuring goods and services are fully familiar with federal procurement requirements and District policy • Follow its procurement policy and federal regulations for services and purchases made with federal funds • Maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements District’s Response The Darrington School District acknowledges that we did not retain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements for the child nutrition cluster. However, we dispute the auditors’ assertion that we did not comply with federal procurement requirements. The district sought quotes from at least three vendors via phone calls per our policy. Unfortunately, several vendors were either unable to provide the products specified in our request for quotes or do not deliver to our area, and therefore did not provide written quotes. The district documented the quotes from responsive vendors. In the future, the district will document all efforts to obtain quotes from both responsive and nonresponsive vendors. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. As noted in the finding above and acknowledged in the District’s response, the District did not maintain documentation to show it obtained three quotes or documentation to show all other potential vendors were unwilling to provide quotes. Therefore, we could not verify that it complied with procurement requirements. We reaffirm our finding and will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR 200, Uniform Guidance, section 319, Competition, establishes the requirement that all procurement transactions with Federal funds be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with standards of this section. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring goods and services, including noncompetitive procurement.
2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 School Breakfast Program 10.555 National School Lunch Program 10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Federal Grantor Name: Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program and Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Program. These programs provide free and reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $383,210 to administer these programs during the 2023–2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. When using federal funds to purchase goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive federal, state or local laws by obtaining quotes or following a competitive bidding process, depending on the estimated cost of the purchase. Federal regulations and District policy require the District to solicit sealed bids or competitive proposals for personal services more than $250,000. The District may procure goods using noncompetitive proposals when the good is only available from a single source. The District must also keep documentation supporting the procurement method used. Description of Condition Our audit found the District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, for two food and dairy vendors, the District did not follow its policy by obtaining at least three quotes or have documentation to support noncompetitive procurement for goods. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Because the District is in a remote location, employees used their knowledge and previous experience to select food vendors that could deliver the specific products they needed timely. Staff did not know they needed to retain written documentation to show how they complied with District policies when selecting vendors. Effect of Condition The District paid one vendor $57,635 and a second vendor $11,809 using federal program funds without documenting it obtained three quotes as required by District policy. Without competitively procuring these purchases, the District cannot demonstrate it received the best price and complied with federal procurement requirements and its own policy. Recommendation We recommend the District: • Dedicate the necessary time and resources to ensure all staff responsible for procuring goods and services are fully familiar with federal procurement requirements and District policy • Follow its procurement policy and federal regulations for services and purchases made with federal funds • Maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements District’s Response The Darrington School District acknowledges that we did not retain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements for the child nutrition cluster. However, we dispute the auditors’ assertion that we did not comply with federal procurement requirements. The district sought quotes from at least three vendors via phone calls per our policy. Unfortunately, several vendors were either unable to provide the products specified in our request for quotes or do not deliver to our area, and therefore did not provide written quotes. The district documented the quotes from responsive vendors. In the future, the district will document all efforts to obtain quotes from both responsive and nonresponsive vendors. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. As noted in the finding above and acknowledged in the District’s response, the District did not maintain documentation to show it obtained three quotes or documentation to show all other potential vendors were unwilling to provide quotes. Therefore, we could not verify that it complied with procurement requirements. We reaffirm our finding and will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR 200, Uniform Guidance, section 319, Competition, establishes the requirement that all procurement transactions with Federal funds be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with standards of this section. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring goods and services, including noncompetitive procurement.
2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 School Breakfast Program 10.555 National School Lunch Program 10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Federal Grantor Name: Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program and Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Program. These programs provide free and reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $383,210 to administer these programs during the 2023–2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. When using federal funds to purchase goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive federal, state or local laws by obtaining quotes or following a competitive bidding process, depending on the estimated cost of the purchase. Federal regulations and District policy require the District to solicit sealed bids or competitive proposals for personal services more than $250,000. The District may procure goods using noncompetitive proposals when the good is only available from a single source. The District must also keep documentation supporting the procurement method used. Description of Condition Our audit found the District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, for two food and dairy vendors, the District did not follow its policy by obtaining at least three quotes or have documentation to support noncompetitive procurement for goods. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Because the District is in a remote location, employees used their knowledge and previous experience to select food vendors that could deliver the specific products they needed timely. Staff did not know they needed to retain written documentation to show how they complied with District policies when selecting vendors. Effect of Condition The District paid one vendor $57,635 and a second vendor $11,809 using federal program funds without documenting it obtained three quotes as required by District policy. Without competitively procuring these purchases, the District cannot demonstrate it received the best price and complied with federal procurement requirements and its own policy. Recommendation We recommend the District: • Dedicate the necessary time and resources to ensure all staff responsible for procuring goods and services are fully familiar with federal procurement requirements and District policy • Follow its procurement policy and federal regulations for services and purchases made with federal funds • Maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements District’s Response The Darrington School District acknowledges that we did not retain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements for the child nutrition cluster. However, we dispute the auditors’ assertion that we did not comply with federal procurement requirements. The district sought quotes from at least three vendors via phone calls per our policy. Unfortunately, several vendors were either unable to provide the products specified in our request for quotes or do not deliver to our area, and therefore did not provide written quotes. The district documented the quotes from responsive vendors. In the future, the district will document all efforts to obtain quotes from both responsive and nonresponsive vendors. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. As noted in the finding above and acknowledged in the District’s response, the District did not maintain documentation to show it obtained three quotes or documentation to show all other potential vendors were unwilling to provide quotes. Therefore, we could not verify that it complied with procurement requirements. We reaffirm our finding and will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR 200, Uniform Guidance, section 319, Competition, establishes the requirement that all procurement transactions with Federal funds be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with standards of this section. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring goods and services, including noncompetitive procurement.
2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 School Breakfast Program 10.555 National School Lunch Program 10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Federal Grantor Name: Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program and Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Program. These programs provide free and reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $383,210 to administer these programs during the 2023–2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. When using federal funds to purchase goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive federal, state or local laws by obtaining quotes or following a competitive bidding process, depending on the estimated cost of the purchase. Federal regulations and District policy require the District to solicit sealed bids or competitive proposals for personal services more than $250,000. The District may procure goods using noncompetitive proposals when the good is only available from a single source. The District must also keep documentation supporting the procurement method used. Description of Condition Our audit found the District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, for two food and dairy vendors, the District did not follow its policy by obtaining at least three quotes or have documentation to support noncompetitive procurement for goods. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Because the District is in a remote location, employees used their knowledge and previous experience to select food vendors that could deliver the specific products they needed timely. Staff did not know they needed to retain written documentation to show how they complied with District policies when selecting vendors. Effect of Condition The District paid one vendor $57,635 and a second vendor $11,809 using federal program funds without documenting it obtained three quotes as required by District policy. Without competitively procuring these purchases, the District cannot demonstrate it received the best price and complied with federal procurement requirements and its own policy. Recommendation We recommend the District: • Dedicate the necessary time and resources to ensure all staff responsible for procuring goods and services are fully familiar with federal procurement requirements and District policy • Follow its procurement policy and federal regulations for services and purchases made with federal funds • Maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements District’s Response The Darrington School District acknowledges that we did not retain documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements for the child nutrition cluster. However, we dispute the auditors’ assertion that we did not comply with federal procurement requirements. The district sought quotes from at least three vendors via phone calls per our policy. Unfortunately, several vendors were either unable to provide the products specified in our request for quotes or do not deliver to our area, and therefore did not provide written quotes. The district documented the quotes from responsive vendors. In the future, the district will document all efforts to obtain quotes from both responsive and nonresponsive vendors. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. As noted in the finding above and acknowledged in the District’s response, the District did not maintain documentation to show it obtained three quotes or documentation to show all other potential vendors were unwilling to provide quotes. Therefore, we could not verify that it complied with procurement requirements. We reaffirm our finding and will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR 200, Uniform Guidance, section 319, Competition, establishes the requirement that all procurement transactions with Federal funds be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with standards of this section. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring goods and services, including noncompetitive procurement.