Audit 357060

FY End
2024-08-31
Total Expended
$3.75M
Findings
2
Programs
17
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-05-23

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
FZSTKCKMLM27 Dan King Auditee
3602772107 Melinda Seibert Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 3—PROGRAM COSTS/MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS Accounting Policies: This Schedule is prepared on the same basis of accounting as North Mason School District’s financial statements. North Mason School District uses the modified accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures represent only the federally funded portions of the program. North Mason School District records should be consulted to determine amounts expended or matched from non-federal sources. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: North Mason School District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. North Mason School District used the federal restricted rate of 2.49% and the federal restricted rate of 14.21%. The amounts shown as current year expenses represent only the federal award portion of the program costs. Entire program costs, including North Mason District’s local matching share, may be more than shown. Such expenditures are recognized following, the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: NOTE 4—NONCASH AWARDS Accounting Policies: This Schedule is prepared on the same basis of accounting as North Mason School District’s financial statements. North Mason School District uses the modified accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures represent only the federally funded portions of the program. North Mason School District records should be consulted to determine amounts expended or matched from non-federal sources. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: North Mason School District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. North Mason School District used the federal restricted rate of 2.49% and the federal restricted rate of 14.21%. The total amount of commodities reported on the schedule is the value of commodities distributed by North Mason School District during the 2023-2024 fiscal year and priced as prescribed by OSPI.
Title: NOTE 5—SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS Accounting Policies: This Schedule is prepared on the same basis of accounting as North Mason School District’s financial statements. North Mason School District uses the modified accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures represent only the federally funded portions of the program. North Mason School District records should be consulted to determine amounts expended or matched from non-federal sources. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: North Mason School District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. North Mason School District used the federal restricted rate of 2.49% and the federal restricted rate of 14.21%. North Mason School District operates a “schoolwide program” in two elementary buildings, a middle school, and alternative high school. Using federal funding, schoolwide programs are designed to upgrade an entire educational program within a school for all students, rather than limit services to certain targeted students. The following federal program amounts were expended by the district in its schoolwide program: Title I (84.010) $753,049.
Title: NOTE 6—SUPPLY CHAIN ASSISTANCE Accounting Policies: This Schedule is prepared on the same basis of accounting as North Mason School District’s financial statements. North Mason School District uses the modified accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures represent only the federally funded portions of the program. North Mason School District records should be consulted to determine amounts expended or matched from non-federal sources. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: North Mason School District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. North Mason School District used the federal restricted rate of 2.49% and the federal restricted rate of 14.21%. School districts who received Supply Chain Assistance under Revenue Code 6198-11 should report their 2023-2024 apportionment allocation amount on their SEFA. Supply Chain Assistance CFDA/ALN #10.555 is considered a formula grant and the revenues should be recorded on the SEFA.
Title: NOTE 7-FEMA COVID-19 DISASTER GRANT Accounting Policies: This Schedule is prepared on the same basis of accounting as North Mason School District’s financial statements. North Mason School District uses the modified accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures represent only the federally funded portions of the program. North Mason School District records should be consulted to determine amounts expended or matched from non-federal sources. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: North Mason School District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. North Mason School District used the federal restricted rate of 2.49% and the federal restricted rate of 14.21%. North Mason School District applied for and received a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant awards for COVID-19 Disaster Relief in 2023-2024.

Finding Details

2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal Title I eligibility requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 – Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Pass-through Award/Contract Number: GT-01442 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The objective of the Title I program is to improve the teaching and learning of children who are at risk of not meeting state academic standards who reside in areas with high concentrations of children from low-income families. During the 2023- 2024 school year, the District spent $753,049 in Title I program funds. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Title I requires participating districts to allocate more funds to schools with higher poverty percentages. Districts must rank schools from highest to lowest poverty concentrations based on the total number of students from low-income families attending the school or residing in the area. Furthermore, the District must ensure schools with the highest poverty concentrations receive the most funding per enrolled student. The rankings are included in the Title I application, and districts must maintain documentation supporting their rankings. Description of Condition The District’s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with eligibility requirements. When the District allocated funding between schools within the same grade span, it only checked that the school with the highest poverty concentration received the most funds. It did not ensure the allocation was adjusted to ensure the per-pupil expenditure (PPE) was higher for the school with the higher poverty concentration, as required. We consider this internal control deficiency to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Staff responsible for allocating funding misunderstood guidance and believed allocating a higher amount in total to the school with the highest poverty concentration met requirements. Staff did not know about the requirement to also ensure schools with a higher poverty concentration receive an allocation that ensures a higher PPE than schools with a lower poverty concentration. Effect of Condition Because the District allocated Title I funds incorrectly, the amount of services provided at schools with higher percentages of low-income students might have been unfairly limited. The District did not comply with eligibility requirements and did not correctly allocate Title I funds from the highest to lowest poverty elementary school buildings, as federal regulations require. For the two schools within this grade-span, the lower poverty school received $210 more per-pupil than the school with the higher poverty level. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen internal controls and perform additional research when necessary to ensure staff understand program guidance and confirm it is complete and accurate before ranking and allocating Title I funding to school buildings. District’s Response The district is strengthening its internal controls for monitoring the Per Pupil Expenditure (PPE) to match higher poverty concentration in its schools by the following: 1. Developing and utilizing an Excel Spreadsheet as a “PPE Tool” to allocate funds appropriately a. The PPE Tool will be a shared working document between the Business Office, Human Resources, and Title I Coordinator, b. The PPE Tool will be utilized when applying for the 2025-2026 Consolidated Grant and all future Consolidated Grant applications; and, c. The PPE Tool will be used when completing budgetary reviews at cabinet meetings. These measures will be implemented going forward as internal controls for ensuring compliance with eligibility requirements for Title I funding. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 34 CFR, Part 200, Title I – Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged, Section 78 – Allocation of funds to school attendance areas and schools
2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal Title I eligibility requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 – Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Pass-through Award/Contract Number: GT-01442 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The objective of the Title I program is to improve the teaching and learning of children who are at risk of not meeting state academic standards who reside in areas with high concentrations of children from low-income families. During the 2023- 2024 school year, the District spent $753,049 in Title I program funds. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and follow internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Title I requires participating districts to allocate more funds to schools with higher poverty percentages. Districts must rank schools from highest to lowest poverty concentrations based on the total number of students from low-income families attending the school or residing in the area. Furthermore, the District must ensure schools with the highest poverty concentrations receive the most funding per enrolled student. The rankings are included in the Title I application, and districts must maintain documentation supporting their rankings. Description of Condition The District’s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with eligibility requirements. When the District allocated funding between schools within the same grade span, it only checked that the school with the highest poverty concentration received the most funds. It did not ensure the allocation was adjusted to ensure the per-pupil expenditure (PPE) was higher for the school with the higher poverty concentration, as required. We consider this internal control deficiency to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Staff responsible for allocating funding misunderstood guidance and believed allocating a higher amount in total to the school with the highest poverty concentration met requirements. Staff did not know about the requirement to also ensure schools with a higher poverty concentration receive an allocation that ensures a higher PPE than schools with a lower poverty concentration. Effect of Condition Because the District allocated Title I funds incorrectly, the amount of services provided at schools with higher percentages of low-income students might have been unfairly limited. The District did not comply with eligibility requirements and did not correctly allocate Title I funds from the highest to lowest poverty elementary school buildings, as federal regulations require. For the two schools within this grade-span, the lower poverty school received $210 more per-pupil than the school with the higher poverty level. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen internal controls and perform additional research when necessary to ensure staff understand program guidance and confirm it is complete and accurate before ranking and allocating Title I funding to school buildings. District’s Response The district is strengthening its internal controls for monitoring the Per Pupil Expenditure (PPE) to match higher poverty concentration in its schools by the following: 1. Developing and utilizing an Excel Spreadsheet as a “PPE Tool” to allocate funds appropriately a. The PPE Tool will be a shared working document between the Business Office, Human Resources, and Title I Coordinator, b. The PPE Tool will be utilized when applying for the 2025-2026 Consolidated Grant and all future Consolidated Grant applications; and, c. The PPE Tool will be used when completing budgetary reviews at cabinet meetings. These measures will be implemented going forward as internal controls for ensuring compliance with eligibility requirements for Title I funding. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 34 CFR, Part 200, Title I – Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged, Section 78 – Allocation of funds to school attendance areas and schools