Audit 356509

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$1.06M
Findings
12
Programs
4
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-05-18

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
560591 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
560592 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
560593 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
560594 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
560595 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
560596 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
1137033 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
1137034 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
1137035 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
1137036 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
1137037 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
1137038 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
U3JSXNNZLP57 Carlton Davids Auditee
2026838305 Jennifer McCahill Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1. Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. APAF has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the Federal award activity of APAF under programs of the Federal Government for the year ended December 31, 2024. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of APAF; accordingly, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of APAF.
Title: Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. APAF has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. APAF has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance.
Title: Note 3. Reconciliation of Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards to Financial Statements Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. APAF has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. Expenditures per the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards $ 1,060,322 Non-Federal Grants and Contributions 1,646,147 GRANTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS REVENUE PER STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS $ 2,706,469

Finding Details

Finding # 2024-001 Timely Financial Reporting Submission (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Criteria or Specific Requirement: §200.328 Financial reporting (c) states that “The recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award.” Condition: As part of our compliance audit over APAF’s financial reporting requirements under the major program, we noted one instance in which a financial report was not submitted to the Federal agency by the deadline stated in the grant agreement. Additionally, the report was submitted after an extended deadline as well. Ultimately, the report was completed and accepted by the donor. Cause: The delay was the result of turnover of the Grants Manager position during the year. Effect or Potential Effect: Late financial report submissions could result in payment withholding, negative impact related to future funding, increased scrutiny by the Federal agency, or ultimately award termination. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our testwork consisted of a sample of two direct awards. The population of active direct awards was three. Late reporting was noted for one of the two awards tested. The control deficiency is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that APAF review its policies and procedures and strengthen internal controls to ensure that all financial reports are submitted to the donor by the deadlines stipulated in the terms of the agreement.
Finding # 2024-001 Timely Financial Reporting Submission (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Criteria or Specific Requirement: §200.328 Financial reporting (c) states that “The recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award.” Condition: As part of our compliance audit over APAF’s financial reporting requirements under the major program, we noted one instance in which a financial report was not submitted to the Federal agency by the deadline stated in the grant agreement. Additionally, the report was submitted after an extended deadline as well. Ultimately, the report was completed and accepted by the donor. Cause: The delay was the result of turnover of the Grants Manager position during the year. Effect or Potential Effect: Late financial report submissions could result in payment withholding, negative impact related to future funding, increased scrutiny by the Federal agency, or ultimately award termination. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our testwork consisted of a sample of two direct awards. The population of active direct awards was three. Late reporting was noted for one of the two awards tested. The control deficiency is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that APAF review its policies and procedures and strengthen internal controls to ensure that all financial reports are submitted to the donor by the deadlines stipulated in the terms of the agreement.
Finding # 2024-001 Timely Financial Reporting Submission (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Criteria or Specific Requirement: §200.328 Financial reporting (c) states that “The recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award.” Condition: As part of our compliance audit over APAF’s financial reporting requirements under the major program, we noted one instance in which a financial report was not submitted to the Federal agency by the deadline stated in the grant agreement. Additionally, the report was submitted after an extended deadline as well. Ultimately, the report was completed and accepted by the donor. Cause: The delay was the result of turnover of the Grants Manager position during the year. Effect or Potential Effect: Late financial report submissions could result in payment withholding, negative impact related to future funding, increased scrutiny by the Federal agency, or ultimately award termination. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our testwork consisted of a sample of two direct awards. The population of active direct awards was three. Late reporting was noted for one of the two awards tested. The control deficiency is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that APAF review its policies and procedures and strengthen internal controls to ensure that all financial reports are submitted to the donor by the deadlines stipulated in the terms of the agreement.
Finding # 2024-001 Timely Financial Reporting Submission (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Criteria or Specific Requirement: §200.328 Financial reporting (c) states that “The recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award.” Condition: As part of our compliance audit over APAF’s financial reporting requirements under the major program, we noted one instance in which a financial report was not submitted to the Federal agency by the deadline stated in the grant agreement. Additionally, the report was submitted after an extended deadline as well. Ultimately, the report was completed and accepted by the donor. Cause: The delay was the result of turnover of the Grants Manager position during the year. Effect or Potential Effect: Late financial report submissions could result in payment withholding, negative impact related to future funding, increased scrutiny by the Federal agency, or ultimately award termination. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our testwork consisted of a sample of two direct awards. The population of active direct awards was three. Late reporting was noted for one of the two awards tested. The control deficiency is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that APAF review its policies and procedures and strengthen internal controls to ensure that all financial reports are submitted to the donor by the deadlines stipulated in the terms of the agreement.
Finding # 2024-001 Timely Financial Reporting Submission (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Criteria or Specific Requirement: §200.328 Financial reporting (c) states that “The recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award.” Condition: As part of our compliance audit over APAF’s financial reporting requirements under the major program, we noted one instance in which a financial report was not submitted to the Federal agency by the deadline stated in the grant agreement. Additionally, the report was submitted after an extended deadline as well. Ultimately, the report was completed and accepted by the donor. Cause: The delay was the result of turnover of the Grants Manager position during the year. Effect or Potential Effect: Late financial report submissions could result in payment withholding, negative impact related to future funding, increased scrutiny by the Federal agency, or ultimately award termination. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our testwork consisted of a sample of two direct awards. The population of active direct awards was three. Late reporting was noted for one of the two awards tested. The control deficiency is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that APAF review its policies and procedures and strengthen internal controls to ensure that all financial reports are submitted to the donor by the deadlines stipulated in the terms of the agreement.
Finding # 2024-001 Timely Financial Reporting Submission (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Criteria or Specific Requirement: §200.328 Financial reporting (c) states that “The recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award.” Condition: As part of our compliance audit over APAF’s financial reporting requirements under the major program, we noted one instance in which a financial report was not submitted to the Federal agency by the deadline stated in the grant agreement. Additionally, the report was submitted after an extended deadline as well. Ultimately, the report was completed and accepted by the donor. Cause: The delay was the result of turnover of the Grants Manager position during the year. Effect or Potential Effect: Late financial report submissions could result in payment withholding, negative impact related to future funding, increased scrutiny by the Federal agency, or ultimately award termination. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our testwork consisted of a sample of two direct awards. The population of active direct awards was three. Late reporting was noted for one of the two awards tested. The control deficiency is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that APAF review its policies and procedures and strengthen internal controls to ensure that all financial reports are submitted to the donor by the deadlines stipulated in the terms of the agreement.
Finding # 2024-001 Timely Financial Reporting Submission (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Criteria or Specific Requirement: §200.328 Financial reporting (c) states that “The recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award.” Condition: As part of our compliance audit over APAF’s financial reporting requirements under the major program, we noted one instance in which a financial report was not submitted to the Federal agency by the deadline stated in the grant agreement. Additionally, the report was submitted after an extended deadline as well. Ultimately, the report was completed and accepted by the donor. Cause: The delay was the result of turnover of the Grants Manager position during the year. Effect or Potential Effect: Late financial report submissions could result in payment withholding, negative impact related to future funding, increased scrutiny by the Federal agency, or ultimately award termination. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our testwork consisted of a sample of two direct awards. The population of active direct awards was three. Late reporting was noted for one of the two awards tested. The control deficiency is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that APAF review its policies and procedures and strengthen internal controls to ensure that all financial reports are submitted to the donor by the deadlines stipulated in the terms of the agreement.
Finding # 2024-001 Timely Financial Reporting Submission (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Criteria or Specific Requirement: §200.328 Financial reporting (c) states that “The recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award.” Condition: As part of our compliance audit over APAF’s financial reporting requirements under the major program, we noted one instance in which a financial report was not submitted to the Federal agency by the deadline stated in the grant agreement. Additionally, the report was submitted after an extended deadline as well. Ultimately, the report was completed and accepted by the donor. Cause: The delay was the result of turnover of the Grants Manager position during the year. Effect or Potential Effect: Late financial report submissions could result in payment withholding, negative impact related to future funding, increased scrutiny by the Federal agency, or ultimately award termination. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our testwork consisted of a sample of two direct awards. The population of active direct awards was three. Late reporting was noted for one of the two awards tested. The control deficiency is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that APAF review its policies and procedures and strengthen internal controls to ensure that all financial reports are submitted to the donor by the deadlines stipulated in the terms of the agreement.
Finding # 2024-001 Timely Financial Reporting Submission (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Criteria or Specific Requirement: §200.328 Financial reporting (c) states that “The recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award.” Condition: As part of our compliance audit over APAF’s financial reporting requirements under the major program, we noted one instance in which a financial report was not submitted to the Federal agency by the deadline stated in the grant agreement. Additionally, the report was submitted after an extended deadline as well. Ultimately, the report was completed and accepted by the donor. Cause: The delay was the result of turnover of the Grants Manager position during the year. Effect or Potential Effect: Late financial report submissions could result in payment withholding, negative impact related to future funding, increased scrutiny by the Federal agency, or ultimately award termination. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our testwork consisted of a sample of two direct awards. The population of active direct awards was three. Late reporting was noted for one of the two awards tested. The control deficiency is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that APAF review its policies and procedures and strengthen internal controls to ensure that all financial reports are submitted to the donor by the deadlines stipulated in the terms of the agreement.
Finding # 2024-001 Timely Financial Reporting Submission (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Criteria or Specific Requirement: §200.328 Financial reporting (c) states that “The recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award.” Condition: As part of our compliance audit over APAF’s financial reporting requirements under the major program, we noted one instance in which a financial report was not submitted to the Federal agency by the deadline stated in the grant agreement. Additionally, the report was submitted after an extended deadline as well. Ultimately, the report was completed and accepted by the donor. Cause: The delay was the result of turnover of the Grants Manager position during the year. Effect or Potential Effect: Late financial report submissions could result in payment withholding, negative impact related to future funding, increased scrutiny by the Federal agency, or ultimately award termination. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our testwork consisted of a sample of two direct awards. The population of active direct awards was three. Late reporting was noted for one of the two awards tested. The control deficiency is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that APAF review its policies and procedures and strengthen internal controls to ensure that all financial reports are submitted to the donor by the deadlines stipulated in the terms of the agreement.
Finding # 2024-001 Timely Financial Reporting Submission (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Criteria or Specific Requirement: §200.328 Financial reporting (c) states that “The recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award.” Condition: As part of our compliance audit over APAF’s financial reporting requirements under the major program, we noted one instance in which a financial report was not submitted to the Federal agency by the deadline stated in the grant agreement. Additionally, the report was submitted after an extended deadline as well. Ultimately, the report was completed and accepted by the donor. Cause: The delay was the result of turnover of the Grants Manager position during the year. Effect or Potential Effect: Late financial report submissions could result in payment withholding, negative impact related to future funding, increased scrutiny by the Federal agency, or ultimately award termination. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our testwork consisted of a sample of two direct awards. The population of active direct awards was three. Late reporting was noted for one of the two awards tested. The control deficiency is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that APAF review its policies and procedures and strengthen internal controls to ensure that all financial reports are submitted to the donor by the deadlines stipulated in the terms of the agreement.
Finding # 2024-001 Timely Financial Reporting Submission (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Criteria or Specific Requirement: §200.328 Financial reporting (c) states that “The recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award.” Condition: As part of our compliance audit over APAF’s financial reporting requirements under the major program, we noted one instance in which a financial report was not submitted to the Federal agency by the deadline stated in the grant agreement. Additionally, the report was submitted after an extended deadline as well. Ultimately, the report was completed and accepted by the donor. Cause: The delay was the result of turnover of the Grants Manager position during the year. Effect or Potential Effect: Late financial report submissions could result in payment withholding, negative impact related to future funding, increased scrutiny by the Federal agency, or ultimately award termination. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: Our testwork consisted of a sample of two direct awards. The population of active direct awards was three. Late reporting was noted for one of the two awards tested. The control deficiency is considered systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that APAF review its policies and procedures and strengthen internal controls to ensure that all financial reports are submitted to the donor by the deadlines stipulated in the terms of the agreement.