Audit 355549

FY End
2024-09-30
Total Expended
$8.75M
Findings
4
Programs
4
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-05-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
559668 2024-002 Material Weakness - A
559669 2024-003 Material Weakness - N
1136110 2024-002 Material Weakness - A
1136111 2024-003 Material Weakness - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $7.69M Yes 2
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $522,071 - 0
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $492,715 - 0
14.896 Family Self-Sufficiency Program $46,422 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
P8NGG5B6ZWN3 Kendra Wignall Auditee
5159861882 Jeffrey J Wiens Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: 1. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Central Iowa Regional Housing Authority and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: 2. The entity did not elect to use the 10% de minimus cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs.

Finding Details

Finding 2024-002: Emergency Housing Vouchers Material Weakness/Noncompliance Criteria: Notice PIH 2023-014 details the statutory restriction prohibiting the reissuance of turnover EHVs after September 30, 2023, as discussed in Section 13 of the Notice PIH 2021-15. Turnover EHVs stand for vouchers made available by families ending their participation with the EHV Program. Condition: The Authority leased 4 new Emergency Housing Vouchers after the September 30, 2023 which was restricted by Notice PIH 2023-014. The Authority incurred $21,547 of HAP expense and $4,000 of service fee expenses related to this. The Authority had earned $3,058.45 of administrative fees and $4,000 of service fees related to these transactions. Cause: The restriction was brought to the attention of the Executive Director but the Executive Director instructed staff to lease the units anyway. Effect or Potential Effect: The Authority was in noncompliance with the restriction to not issue new EHV Vouchers after September 30, 2024. Adjustments were made during the audit process to account for this. The $21,547 of HAP expense and $4,000 of service fee expense were moved to the Authority’s nonfederal Business program. As a result, the HAP expense in the EHV program were reduced and those funds flowed into EHV’s net restricted position. The administrative funds and service fees earned were reduced and the related funds were added to unearned revenue. Recommendation: The Authority should review Notice PIH 2023-014 and not issue any new EHV Vouchers. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee’s management agrees with the finding.
Finding 2024-003: Voucher Management System, Financial Data Schedule Material Weakness/Noncompliance Criteria: The PHA submits HUD-52681-B, Voucher for Payment of Annual Contributions and Operating Statement monthly to HUD electronically via the VMS. This information is used for funding and monitoring decisions. The Authority is also required to submit its year-end financial information, financial data schedules (FDS), utilizing HUD’s Financial Assessment System. HUD utilizes this data for monitoring and oversight. Condition: During our audit, we attempted to reconcile the Unrestricted Net Position (UNP) reported in the VMS system for both the Housing Choice Voucher program and the Emergency Housing Voucher program. The Emergency Housing Voucher program was reported in VMS incorrectly and did not reconcile to either the FDS or the Authority general ledger. The variance was $5,901. We noted for the Housing Choice Voucher program that the UNP did reconcile to the FDS but not the general ledger. In further reviewing the data, the FDS and general ledger did not agree and had a $36,152 variance. We further noted the cash and investment reported for Emergency Housing Voucher program did not reconcile and the VMS figure had a variance of $20,640. Cause: The error in the Housing Choice Voucher program appeared to be due to a journal entry posted after the FDS was submitted and the VMS was adjusted to match the FDS. We were unable to determine what the error occurred in the Emergency Housing Voucher program. Effect or Potential Effect: The items listed above reported in VMS and the FDS systems did not reconcile to the Authority’s supporting data. Adjustments were made for the submission of the audited FDS and VMS was adjusted to match. Recommendation: The Authority should review the errors with its fee accountant to ensure future reports reconcile to the underlying data. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee’s management agrees with the finding.
Finding 2024-002: Emergency Housing Vouchers Material Weakness/Noncompliance Criteria: Notice PIH 2023-014 details the statutory restriction prohibiting the reissuance of turnover EHVs after September 30, 2023, as discussed in Section 13 of the Notice PIH 2021-15. Turnover EHVs stand for vouchers made available by families ending their participation with the EHV Program. Condition: The Authority leased 4 new Emergency Housing Vouchers after the September 30, 2023 which was restricted by Notice PIH 2023-014. The Authority incurred $21,547 of HAP expense and $4,000 of service fee expenses related to this. The Authority had earned $3,058.45 of administrative fees and $4,000 of service fees related to these transactions. Cause: The restriction was brought to the attention of the Executive Director but the Executive Director instructed staff to lease the units anyway. Effect or Potential Effect: The Authority was in noncompliance with the restriction to not issue new EHV Vouchers after September 30, 2024. Adjustments were made during the audit process to account for this. The $21,547 of HAP expense and $4,000 of service fee expense were moved to the Authority’s nonfederal Business program. As a result, the HAP expense in the EHV program were reduced and those funds flowed into EHV’s net restricted position. The administrative funds and service fees earned were reduced and the related funds were added to unearned revenue. Recommendation: The Authority should review Notice PIH 2023-014 and not issue any new EHV Vouchers. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee’s management agrees with the finding.
Finding 2024-003: Voucher Management System, Financial Data Schedule Material Weakness/Noncompliance Criteria: The PHA submits HUD-52681-B, Voucher for Payment of Annual Contributions and Operating Statement monthly to HUD electronically via the VMS. This information is used for funding and monitoring decisions. The Authority is also required to submit its year-end financial information, financial data schedules (FDS), utilizing HUD’s Financial Assessment System. HUD utilizes this data for monitoring and oversight. Condition: During our audit, we attempted to reconcile the Unrestricted Net Position (UNP) reported in the VMS system for both the Housing Choice Voucher program and the Emergency Housing Voucher program. The Emergency Housing Voucher program was reported in VMS incorrectly and did not reconcile to either the FDS or the Authority general ledger. The variance was $5,901. We noted for the Housing Choice Voucher program that the UNP did reconcile to the FDS but not the general ledger. In further reviewing the data, the FDS and general ledger did not agree and had a $36,152 variance. We further noted the cash and investment reported for Emergency Housing Voucher program did not reconcile and the VMS figure had a variance of $20,640. Cause: The error in the Housing Choice Voucher program appeared to be due to a journal entry posted after the FDS was submitted and the VMS was adjusted to match the FDS. We were unable to determine what the error occurred in the Emergency Housing Voucher program. Effect or Potential Effect: The items listed above reported in VMS and the FDS systems did not reconcile to the Authority’s supporting data. Adjustments were made for the submission of the audited FDS and VMS was adjusted to match. Recommendation: The Authority should review the errors with its fee accountant to ensure future reports reconcile to the underlying data. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee’s management agrees with the finding.