Audit 355166

FY End
2024-10-31
Total Expended
$74.04M
Findings
6
Programs
21
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-04-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
558933 2024-009 - - B
558934 2024-011 Material Weakness - B
558935 2024-010 Material Weakness - I
1135375 2024-009 - - B
1135376 2024-011 Material Weakness - B
1135377 2024-010 Material Weakness - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
YNYLNKW7THY5 Karen Fontenot Auditee
3372918202 Bryan Joubert Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of presentation Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government (Government) under programs of the federal government for the year ended October 31, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Government, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Government. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as applied to governmental units, which is described in Note 1 to the Government’s basic financial statements for the year ended October 31, 2024. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principle contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government (Government) under programs of the federal government for the year ended October 31, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Government, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Government.
Title: Summary of Signifcant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government (Government) under programs of the federal government for the year ended October 31, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Government, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Government. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as applied to governmental units, which is described in Note 1 to the Government’s basic financial statements for the year ended October 31, 2024. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principle contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as applied to governmental units, which is described in Note 1 to the Government’s basic financial statements for the year ended October 31, 2024. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principle contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government (Government) under programs of the federal government for the year ended October 31, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Government, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Government. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as applied to governmental units, which is described in Note 1 to the Government’s basic financial statements for the year ended October 31, 2024. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principle contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate The Government has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY: 2024-009 Compliance with Allowable Costs Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2024 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (21.027) Criteria In accordance with the Uniform Guidance, the Government is required to have internal controls in place that are properly designed, implemented and operating effectively to ensure compliance with the requirements as they relate to allowable costs. Condition The Government’s internal controls over allowable costs over this major federal program did not allow for the identification of invoices that lacked sufficient evidence to determine the allowability of the cost charged. Cause The Government did not adhere to their established controls over allowable costs. Effect A sample of 29 transactions totaling $6,758,318 was selected for testing. A disbursement transaction with multiple invoices lacked sufficient evidence for certain travel related charges to determine the allowability of the costs. As a result, the Government had questioned costs totaling $1,792. Our sample was a non-statistical sample. Recommendation The Government should review their established controls, policies and procedures for effectiveness and ensure invoices submitted by the vendor include detailed support for all expenses incurred. Additionally, management should ensure all costs charged to the program are allowable under the grant guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The Government agrees with this finding. While the actual cost itself is allowable, we acknowledge that the supporting documentation for the transaction was not present at the time of payment. We have discussed the invoice and documentation issues with the vendor, who will modify the invoices to comply in future billing periods. We have also discussed the lack of documentation and corrective action with staff in charge of reviewing and approving these invoices for payment. We do not expect this finding to reoccur.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY: 2024-011 Compliance with Allowable Costs Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2024 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (21.027) Criteria In accordance with the Uniform Guidance, the Government is required to have internal controls in place that are properly designed, implemented and operating effectively to ensure compliance with the requirements as they relate to allowable costs. Condition The Government’s internal controls over allowable costs over this major federal program did not allow for the identification of invoices that lacked sufficient evidence to determine the allowability of the cost charged. Cause The Government did not adhere to their established controls over allowable costs. Effect A sample of 29 transactions totaling $6,758,318 was selected for testing. A disbursement transaction with multiple invoices lacked sufficient evidence for certain travel related charges to determine the allowability of the costs. As a result, the Government had questioned costs totaling $1,792. Our sample was a non-statistical sample. Recommendation The Government should review their established controls, policies and procedures for effectiveness and ensure invoices submitted by the vendor include detailed support for all expenses incurred. Additionally, management should ensure all costs charged to the program are allowable under the grant guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The Government agrees with this finding. While the actual cost itself is allowable, we acknowledge that the supporting documentation for the transaction was not present at the time of payment. We have discussed the invoice and documentation issues with the vendor, who will modify the invoices to comply in future billing periods. We have also discussed the lack of documentation and corrective action with staff in charge of reviewing and approving these invoices for payment. We do not expect this finding to reoccur.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY: 2024-010 Controls over Suspension and Debarment Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2024 Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund (21.029) Criteria Federal regulation requires the Government to verify vendors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government prior to the Government doing business with them. Condition The Government failed to verify applicable vendors were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government prior to the Government doing business with them. Cause The Government did not have internal control policies and procedures in place to ensure that all vendors were verified prior to doing business with them for services funded with federal government grants. Effect Failure to verify vendors are allowed to do business with the Government could lead to non-compliance. Context A sample of twelve vendors was selected from a population of twenty vendors. The testing determined that two of the vendors had not been verified by the Government prior to doing business with them. Our sample was a non-statistical sample. Recommendation The Government should review their established controls, policies and procedures to ensure that the verification of vendors is done prior to doing business with them. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The Government agrees with this finding. Purchasing is normally alerted to verify suspension and debarment status when PO’s are issued in designated federal grant funds. However, we have a few departments that do not report grants in separate funds. If these departments do not identify that a federal grant is the funding source when initiating the procurement process, then Purchasing is not aware that the verifications need to be made. We will review the documentation requirements with the appropriate departments so that purchases made with grant funds in these departments are properly identified. We do not expect this finding to reoccur.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY: 2024-009 Compliance with Allowable Costs Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2024 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (21.027) Criteria In accordance with the Uniform Guidance, the Government is required to have internal controls in place that are properly designed, implemented and operating effectively to ensure compliance with the requirements as they relate to allowable costs. Condition The Government’s internal controls over allowable costs over this major federal program did not allow for the identification of invoices that lacked sufficient evidence to determine the allowability of the cost charged. Cause The Government did not adhere to their established controls over allowable costs. Effect A sample of 29 transactions totaling $6,758,318 was selected for testing. A disbursement transaction with multiple invoices lacked sufficient evidence for certain travel related charges to determine the allowability of the costs. As a result, the Government had questioned costs totaling $1,792. Our sample was a non-statistical sample. Recommendation The Government should review their established controls, policies and procedures for effectiveness and ensure invoices submitted by the vendor include detailed support for all expenses incurred. Additionally, management should ensure all costs charged to the program are allowable under the grant guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The Government agrees with this finding. While the actual cost itself is allowable, we acknowledge that the supporting documentation for the transaction was not present at the time of payment. We have discussed the invoice and documentation issues with the vendor, who will modify the invoices to comply in future billing periods. We have also discussed the lack of documentation and corrective action with staff in charge of reviewing and approving these invoices for payment. We do not expect this finding to reoccur.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY: 2024-011 Compliance with Allowable Costs Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2024 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (21.027) Criteria In accordance with the Uniform Guidance, the Government is required to have internal controls in place that are properly designed, implemented and operating effectively to ensure compliance with the requirements as they relate to allowable costs. Condition The Government’s internal controls over allowable costs over this major federal program did not allow for the identification of invoices that lacked sufficient evidence to determine the allowability of the cost charged. Cause The Government did not adhere to their established controls over allowable costs. Effect A sample of 29 transactions totaling $6,758,318 was selected for testing. A disbursement transaction with multiple invoices lacked sufficient evidence for certain travel related charges to determine the allowability of the costs. As a result, the Government had questioned costs totaling $1,792. Our sample was a non-statistical sample. Recommendation The Government should review their established controls, policies and procedures for effectiveness and ensure invoices submitted by the vendor include detailed support for all expenses incurred. Additionally, management should ensure all costs charged to the program are allowable under the grant guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The Government agrees with this finding. While the actual cost itself is allowable, we acknowledge that the supporting documentation for the transaction was not present at the time of payment. We have discussed the invoice and documentation issues with the vendor, who will modify the invoices to comply in future billing periods. We have also discussed the lack of documentation and corrective action with staff in charge of reviewing and approving these invoices for payment. We do not expect this finding to reoccur.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY: 2024-010 Controls over Suspension and Debarment Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2024 Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund (21.029) Criteria Federal regulation requires the Government to verify vendors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government prior to the Government doing business with them. Condition The Government failed to verify applicable vendors were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government prior to the Government doing business with them. Cause The Government did not have internal control policies and procedures in place to ensure that all vendors were verified prior to doing business with them for services funded with federal government grants. Effect Failure to verify vendors are allowed to do business with the Government could lead to non-compliance. Context A sample of twelve vendors was selected from a population of twenty vendors. The testing determined that two of the vendors had not been verified by the Government prior to doing business with them. Our sample was a non-statistical sample. Recommendation The Government should review their established controls, policies and procedures to ensure that the verification of vendors is done prior to doing business with them. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The Government agrees with this finding. Purchasing is normally alerted to verify suspension and debarment status when PO’s are issued in designated federal grant funds. However, we have a few departments that do not report grants in separate funds. If these departments do not identify that a federal grant is the funding source when initiating the procurement process, then Purchasing is not aware that the verifications need to be made. We will review the documentation requirements with the appropriate departments so that purchases made with grant funds in these departments are properly identified. We do not expect this finding to reoccur.