Audit 355035

FY End
2021-12-31
Total Expended
$5.75M
Findings
26
Programs
5
Year: 2021 Accepted: 2025-04-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
558148 2021-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
558149 2021-003 Significant Deficiency Yes N
558150 2021-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
558151 2021-003 Significant Deficiency Yes N
558152 2021-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
558153 2021-003 Significant Deficiency Yes N
558154 2021-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
558155 2021-003 Significant Deficiency Yes N
558156 2021-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
558157 2021-003 Significant Deficiency Yes N
558158 2021-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
558159 2021-003 Significant Deficiency Yes N
558160 2021-004 Material Weakness - ABL
1134590 2021-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1134591 2021-003 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1134592 2021-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1134593 2021-003 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1134594 2021-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1134595 2021-003 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1134596 2021-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1134597 2021-003 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1134598 2021-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1134599 2021-003 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1134600 2021-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1134601 2021-003 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1134602 2021-004 Material Weakness - ABL

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZEKEJ3G79JW8 Christi Hines Auditee
5303375784 Scott Gold Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Hill Country Community Clinic, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of Hill Country Community Clinic, Inc., under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2021. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Hill Country Community Clinic, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, results of operations, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Hill Country Community Clinic, Inc.
Title: Federal Loan Programs Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Hill Country Community Clinic, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Hill Country Community Clinic, Inc. did not have any federal loan programs during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Title: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)(Unaudited) Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Hill Country Community Clinic, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Hill Country Community Clinic, Inc. did not receive any donated PPE from a federal source during the year ended December 31, 2021.

Finding Details

Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting – 45 CFR 75.342 Condition – The Organization is required to prepare and submit an annual Uniform Data Set (UDS) report for each calendar year, and annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for each grant year and quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports (FCTR) for each grant budget period. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned costs – None Context – Two reports from those listed above were selected for testing. The sampling methodology used was not, was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the eighteen inputs tested, two exceptions were noted related to the UDS report and two exceptions were noted related to the annual FFR. Effect – Errors were made on the annual UDS and annual FFR reports. Cause – The Organization’s policies and procedures did not identify certain errors that were noted on required reports. Turnover in key positions resulted in the Organization being unable to support two attributes selected for testing on the UDS report. Program income reported on the annual FFR was not reported at the correct amount nor on the proper lines. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat of 2020-004 finding Recommendation – The Organization should revise its policies and procedures over Federal reporting to ensure reports are prepared using accurate information.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts – 42 CFR 245(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f). Condition – Patients who were eligible for sliding fee discounts under the Organization’s policy were not given sliding fee discounts or received sliding fee discounts inconsistent with the policy. Questioned costs – None Context – A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 39,665 encounters. The sampling methodology used was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 transactions tested, 6 were determined to include errors in the application of the sliding fee discount program and policy. Effect – Improper sliding fee discounts were given and appropriate documentation was not maintained for all sliding fee discounts given. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee discount policy. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat finding of finding 2020-005 Recommendation – The Organization should continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. Patient files should include documentation of eligibility to receive sliding fee scale discounts.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting – 45 CFR 75.342 Condition – The Organization is required to prepare and submit an annual Uniform Data Set (UDS) report for each calendar year, and annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for each grant year and quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports (FCTR) for each grant budget period. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned costs – None Context – Two reports from those listed above were selected for testing. The sampling methodology used was not, was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the eighteen inputs tested, two exceptions were noted related to the UDS report and two exceptions were noted related to the annual FFR. Effect – Errors were made on the annual UDS and annual FFR reports. Cause – The Organization’s policies and procedures did not identify certain errors that were noted on required reports. Turnover in key positions resulted in the Organization being unable to support two attributes selected for testing on the UDS report. Program income reported on the annual FFR was not reported at the correct amount nor on the proper lines. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat of 2020-004 finding Recommendation – The Organization should revise its policies and procedures over Federal reporting to ensure reports are prepared using accurate information.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts – 42 CFR 245(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f). Condition – Patients who were eligible for sliding fee discounts under the Organization’s policy were not given sliding fee discounts or received sliding fee discounts inconsistent with the policy. Questioned costs – None Context – A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 39,665 encounters. The sampling methodology used was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 transactions tested, 6 were determined to include errors in the application of the sliding fee discount program and policy. Effect – Improper sliding fee discounts were given and appropriate documentation was not maintained for all sliding fee discounts given. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee discount policy. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat finding of finding 2020-005 Recommendation – The Organization should continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. Patient files should include documentation of eligibility to receive sliding fee scale discounts.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting – 45 CFR 75.342 Condition – The Organization is required to prepare and submit an annual Uniform Data Set (UDS) report for each calendar year, and annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for each grant year and quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports (FCTR) for each grant budget period. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned costs – None Context – Two reports from those listed above were selected for testing. The sampling methodology used was not, was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the eighteen inputs tested, two exceptions were noted related to the UDS report and two exceptions were noted related to the annual FFR. Effect – Errors were made on the annual UDS and annual FFR reports. Cause – The Organization’s policies and procedures did not identify certain errors that were noted on required reports. Turnover in key positions resulted in the Organization being unable to support two attributes selected for testing on the UDS report. Program income reported on the annual FFR was not reported at the correct amount nor on the proper lines. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat of 2020-004 finding Recommendation – The Organization should revise its policies and procedures over Federal reporting to ensure reports are prepared using accurate information.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts – 42 CFR 245(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f). Condition – Patients who were eligible for sliding fee discounts under the Organization’s policy were not given sliding fee discounts or received sliding fee discounts inconsistent with the policy. Questioned costs – None Context – A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 39,665 encounters. The sampling methodology used was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 transactions tested, 6 were determined to include errors in the application of the sliding fee discount program and policy. Effect – Improper sliding fee discounts were given and appropriate documentation was not maintained for all sliding fee discounts given. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee discount policy. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat finding of finding 2020-005 Recommendation – The Organization should continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. Patient files should include documentation of eligibility to receive sliding fee scale discounts.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting – 45 CFR 75.342 Condition – The Organization is required to prepare and submit an annual Uniform Data Set (UDS) report for each calendar year, and annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for each grant year and quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports (FCTR) for each grant budget period. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned costs – None Context – Two reports from those listed above were selected for testing. The sampling methodology used was not, was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the eighteen inputs tested, two exceptions were noted related to the UDS report and two exceptions were noted related to the annual FFR. Effect – Errors were made on the annual UDS and annual FFR reports. Cause – The Organization’s policies and procedures did not identify certain errors that were noted on required reports. Turnover in key positions resulted in the Organization being unable to support two attributes selected for testing on the UDS report. Program income reported on the annual FFR was not reported at the correct amount nor on the proper lines. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat of 2020-004 finding Recommendation – The Organization should revise its policies and procedures over Federal reporting to ensure reports are prepared using accurate information.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts – 42 CFR 245(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f). Condition – Patients who were eligible for sliding fee discounts under the Organization’s policy were not given sliding fee discounts or received sliding fee discounts inconsistent with the policy. Questioned costs – None Context – A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 39,665 encounters. The sampling methodology used was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 transactions tested, 6 were determined to include errors in the application of the sliding fee discount program and policy. Effect – Improper sliding fee discounts were given and appropriate documentation was not maintained for all sliding fee discounts given. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee discount policy. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat finding of finding 2020-005 Recommendation – The Organization should continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. Patient files should include documentation of eligibility to receive sliding fee scale discounts.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting – 45 CFR 75.342 Condition – The Organization is required to prepare and submit an annual Uniform Data Set (UDS) report for each calendar year, and annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for each grant year and quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports (FCTR) for each grant budget period. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned costs – None Context – Two reports from those listed above were selected for testing. The sampling methodology used was not, was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the eighteen inputs tested, two exceptions were noted related to the UDS report and two exceptions were noted related to the annual FFR. Effect – Errors were made on the annual UDS and annual FFR reports. Cause – The Organization’s policies and procedures did not identify certain errors that were noted on required reports. Turnover in key positions resulted in the Organization being unable to support two attributes selected for testing on the UDS report. Program income reported on the annual FFR was not reported at the correct amount nor on the proper lines. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat of 2020-004 finding Recommendation – The Organization should revise its policies and procedures over Federal reporting to ensure reports are prepared using accurate information.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts – 42 CFR 245(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f). Condition – Patients who were eligible for sliding fee discounts under the Organization’s policy were not given sliding fee discounts or received sliding fee discounts inconsistent with the policy. Questioned costs – None Context – A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 39,665 encounters. The sampling methodology used was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 transactions tested, 6 were determined to include errors in the application of the sliding fee discount program and policy. Effect – Improper sliding fee discounts were given and appropriate documentation was not maintained for all sliding fee discounts given. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee discount policy. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat finding of finding 2020-005 Recommendation – The Organization should continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. Patient files should include documentation of eligibility to receive sliding fee scale discounts.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting – 45 CFR 75.342 Condition – The Organization is required to prepare and submit an annual Uniform Data Set (UDS) report for each calendar year, and annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for each grant year and quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports (FCTR) for each grant budget period. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned costs – None Context – Two reports from those listed above were selected for testing. The sampling methodology used was not, was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the eighteen inputs tested, two exceptions were noted related to the UDS report and two exceptions were noted related to the annual FFR. Effect – Errors were made on the annual UDS and annual FFR reports. Cause – The Organization’s policies and procedures did not identify certain errors that were noted on required reports. Turnover in key positions resulted in the Organization being unable to support two attributes selected for testing on the UDS report. Program income reported on the annual FFR was not reported at the correct amount nor on the proper lines. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat of 2020-004 finding Recommendation – The Organization should revise its policies and procedures over Federal reporting to ensure reports are prepared using accurate information.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts – 42 CFR 245(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f). Condition – Patients who were eligible for sliding fee discounts under the Organization’s policy were not given sliding fee discounts or received sliding fee discounts inconsistent with the policy. Questioned costs – None Context – A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 39,665 encounters. The sampling methodology used was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 transactions tested, 6 were determined to include errors in the application of the sliding fee discount program and policy. Effect – Improper sliding fee discounts were given and appropriate documentation was not maintained for all sliding fee discounts given. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee discount policy. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat finding of finding 2020-005 Recommendation – The Organization should continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. Patient files should include documentation of eligibility to receive sliding fee scale discounts.
Federal Assistance Listing No. 93.498 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services COVID-19- Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting (45 CFR 75.342) and Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 563 and Pub. L. No. 116-139, 134 Stat. 622, Pub. L. No. 116-260, Pub. L. No. 117-2) Condition – Within the Provider Relief Fund Reporting Portal for Period 1, the Organization reported other Provider Relief Fund (PRF) expenses and lost revenues calculated using option i. The Organization did not maintain adequate documentation to support some other PRF expenses were attributable to coronavirus, incurred following the accrual basis of accounting during the period of availability, and/or not eligible to be reimbursed by other sources. The Organization also did not calculate lost revenues following the accrual basis of accounting and other guidance issued by HHS. Questioned costs – $1,566,926; Calculated as total expense charged to PRF for Period 1. Context – The Period 1 PRF report was tested. The Organization allocated salaries and employee benefits to PRF for time associated with COVID-19 prevention activities; however, these salaries and benefits were not supported as incremental and necessary costs for the prevention, preparation and response to COVID-19 and a portion of these salaries and benefits were also reimbursed by other sources. The Organization calculated lost revenues of $668,478 based on patient service revenue information from the practice management system rather than lost revenues of $946,314 based on accrual basis financial records. Effect –Based on the Period 1 PRF report filed, the Organization utilized PRF payments received on expenses and lost revenues that were not attributable to coronavirus, were reimbursed by other sources, and/or were not allowable in accordance with other guidance issued by HHS. Cause – Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution is a new program with complex and evolving regulations and compliance requirements. Internal controls were not in place to ensure the Organization correctly applied the guidance. Identification as a repeat finding – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Policies and procedures over allowable activities and federal grant reporting should be modified to ensure expenditures charged to grants are for activities allowed and federal grant reports are prepared using complete and accurate information.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting – 45 CFR 75.342 Condition – The Organization is required to prepare and submit an annual Uniform Data Set (UDS) report for each calendar year, and annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for each grant year and quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports (FCTR) for each grant budget period. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned costs – None Context – Two reports from those listed above were selected for testing. The sampling methodology used was not, was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the eighteen inputs tested, two exceptions were noted related to the UDS report and two exceptions were noted related to the annual FFR. Effect – Errors were made on the annual UDS and annual FFR reports. Cause – The Organization’s policies and procedures did not identify certain errors that were noted on required reports. Turnover in key positions resulted in the Organization being unable to support two attributes selected for testing on the UDS report. Program income reported on the annual FFR was not reported at the correct amount nor on the proper lines. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat of 2020-004 finding Recommendation – The Organization should revise its policies and procedures over Federal reporting to ensure reports are prepared using accurate information.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts – 42 CFR 245(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f). Condition – Patients who were eligible for sliding fee discounts under the Organization’s policy were not given sliding fee discounts or received sliding fee discounts inconsistent with the policy. Questioned costs – None Context – A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 39,665 encounters. The sampling methodology used was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 transactions tested, 6 were determined to include errors in the application of the sliding fee discount program and policy. Effect – Improper sliding fee discounts were given and appropriate documentation was not maintained for all sliding fee discounts given. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee discount policy. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat finding of finding 2020-005 Recommendation – The Organization should continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. Patient files should include documentation of eligibility to receive sliding fee scale discounts.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting – 45 CFR 75.342 Condition – The Organization is required to prepare and submit an annual Uniform Data Set (UDS) report for each calendar year, and annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for each grant year and quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports (FCTR) for each grant budget period. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned costs – None Context – Two reports from those listed above were selected for testing. The sampling methodology used was not, was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the eighteen inputs tested, two exceptions were noted related to the UDS report and two exceptions were noted related to the annual FFR. Effect – Errors were made on the annual UDS and annual FFR reports. Cause – The Organization’s policies and procedures did not identify certain errors that were noted on required reports. Turnover in key positions resulted in the Organization being unable to support two attributes selected for testing on the UDS report. Program income reported on the annual FFR was not reported at the correct amount nor on the proper lines. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat of 2020-004 finding Recommendation – The Organization should revise its policies and procedures over Federal reporting to ensure reports are prepared using accurate information.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts – 42 CFR 245(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f). Condition – Patients who were eligible for sliding fee discounts under the Organization’s policy were not given sliding fee discounts or received sliding fee discounts inconsistent with the policy. Questioned costs – None Context – A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 39,665 encounters. The sampling methodology used was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 transactions tested, 6 were determined to include errors in the application of the sliding fee discount program and policy. Effect – Improper sliding fee discounts were given and appropriate documentation was not maintained for all sliding fee discounts given. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee discount policy. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat finding of finding 2020-005 Recommendation – The Organization should continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. Patient files should include documentation of eligibility to receive sliding fee scale discounts.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting – 45 CFR 75.342 Condition – The Organization is required to prepare and submit an annual Uniform Data Set (UDS) report for each calendar year, and annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for each grant year and quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports (FCTR) for each grant budget period. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned costs – None Context – Two reports from those listed above were selected for testing. The sampling methodology used was not, was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the eighteen inputs tested, two exceptions were noted related to the UDS report and two exceptions were noted related to the annual FFR. Effect – Errors were made on the annual UDS and annual FFR reports. Cause – The Organization’s policies and procedures did not identify certain errors that were noted on required reports. Turnover in key positions resulted in the Organization being unable to support two attributes selected for testing on the UDS report. Program income reported on the annual FFR was not reported at the correct amount nor on the proper lines. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat of 2020-004 finding Recommendation – The Organization should revise its policies and procedures over Federal reporting to ensure reports are prepared using accurate information.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts – 42 CFR 245(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f). Condition – Patients who were eligible for sliding fee discounts under the Organization’s policy were not given sliding fee discounts or received sliding fee discounts inconsistent with the policy. Questioned costs – None Context – A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 39,665 encounters. The sampling methodology used was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 transactions tested, 6 were determined to include errors in the application of the sliding fee discount program and policy. Effect – Improper sliding fee discounts were given and appropriate documentation was not maintained for all sliding fee discounts given. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee discount policy. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat finding of finding 2020-005 Recommendation – The Organization should continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. Patient files should include documentation of eligibility to receive sliding fee scale discounts.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting – 45 CFR 75.342 Condition – The Organization is required to prepare and submit an annual Uniform Data Set (UDS) report for each calendar year, and annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for each grant year and quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports (FCTR) for each grant budget period. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned costs – None Context – Two reports from those listed above were selected for testing. The sampling methodology used was not, was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the eighteen inputs tested, two exceptions were noted related to the UDS report and two exceptions were noted related to the annual FFR. Effect – Errors were made on the annual UDS and annual FFR reports. Cause – The Organization’s policies and procedures did not identify certain errors that were noted on required reports. Turnover in key positions resulted in the Organization being unable to support two attributes selected for testing on the UDS report. Program income reported on the annual FFR was not reported at the correct amount nor on the proper lines. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat of 2020-004 finding Recommendation – The Organization should revise its policies and procedures over Federal reporting to ensure reports are prepared using accurate information.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts – 42 CFR 245(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f). Condition – Patients who were eligible for sliding fee discounts under the Organization’s policy were not given sliding fee discounts or received sliding fee discounts inconsistent with the policy. Questioned costs – None Context – A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 39,665 encounters. The sampling methodology used was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 transactions tested, 6 were determined to include errors in the application of the sliding fee discount program and policy. Effect – Improper sliding fee discounts were given and appropriate documentation was not maintained for all sliding fee discounts given. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee discount policy. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat finding of finding 2020-005 Recommendation – The Organization should continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. Patient files should include documentation of eligibility to receive sliding fee scale discounts.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting – 45 CFR 75.342 Condition – The Organization is required to prepare and submit an annual Uniform Data Set (UDS) report for each calendar year, and annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for each grant year and quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports (FCTR) for each grant budget period. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned costs – None Context – Two reports from those listed above were selected for testing. The sampling methodology used was not, was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the eighteen inputs tested, two exceptions were noted related to the UDS report and two exceptions were noted related to the annual FFR. Effect – Errors were made on the annual UDS and annual FFR reports. Cause – The Organization’s policies and procedures did not identify certain errors that were noted on required reports. Turnover in key positions resulted in the Organization being unable to support two attributes selected for testing on the UDS report. Program income reported on the annual FFR was not reported at the correct amount nor on the proper lines. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat of 2020-004 finding Recommendation – The Organization should revise its policies and procedures over Federal reporting to ensure reports are prepared using accurate information.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts – 42 CFR 245(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f). Condition – Patients who were eligible for sliding fee discounts under the Organization’s policy were not given sliding fee discounts or received sliding fee discounts inconsistent with the policy. Questioned costs – None Context – A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 39,665 encounters. The sampling methodology used was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 transactions tested, 6 were determined to include errors in the application of the sliding fee discount program and policy. Effect – Improper sliding fee discounts were given and appropriate documentation was not maintained for all sliding fee discounts given. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee discount policy. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat finding of finding 2020-005 Recommendation – The Organization should continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. Patient files should include documentation of eligibility to receive sliding fee scale discounts.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting – 45 CFR 75.342 Condition – The Organization is required to prepare and submit an annual Uniform Data Set (UDS) report for each calendar year, and annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for each grant year and quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports (FCTR) for each grant budget period. These reports are to be prepared using accurate financial information. Questioned costs – None Context – Two reports from those listed above were selected for testing. The sampling methodology used was not, was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the eighteen inputs tested, two exceptions were noted related to the UDS report and two exceptions were noted related to the annual FFR. Effect – Errors were made on the annual UDS and annual FFR reports. Cause – The Organization’s policies and procedures did not identify certain errors that were noted on required reports. Turnover in key positions resulted in the Organization being unable to support two attributes selected for testing on the UDS report. Program income reported on the annual FFR was not reported at the correct amount nor on the proper lines. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat of 2020-004 finding Recommendation – The Organization should revise its policies and procedures over Federal reporting to ensure reports are prepared using accurate information.
Federal Assistance Listing Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 2 H80CS04226-16-00 Program Year 2021 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts – 42 CFR 245(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR section 51c.303(g) and 42 CFR section 56.303(f). Condition – Patients who were eligible for sliding fee discounts under the Organization’s policy were not given sliding fee discounts or received sliding fee discounts inconsistent with the policy. Questioned costs – None Context – A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 39,665 encounters. The sampling methodology used was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 transactions tested, 6 were determined to include errors in the application of the sliding fee discount program and policy. Effect – Improper sliding fee discounts were given and appropriate documentation was not maintained for all sliding fee discounts given. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee discount policy. Identification as a repeat finding – Repeat finding of finding 2020-005 Recommendation – The Organization should continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale. Patient files should include documentation of eligibility to receive sliding fee scale discounts.
Federal Assistance Listing No. 93.498 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services COVID-19- Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting (45 CFR 75.342) and Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 563 and Pub. L. No. 116-139, 134 Stat. 622, Pub. L. No. 116-260, Pub. L. No. 117-2) Condition – Within the Provider Relief Fund Reporting Portal for Period 1, the Organization reported other Provider Relief Fund (PRF) expenses and lost revenues calculated using option i. The Organization did not maintain adequate documentation to support some other PRF expenses were attributable to coronavirus, incurred following the accrual basis of accounting during the period of availability, and/or not eligible to be reimbursed by other sources. The Organization also did not calculate lost revenues following the accrual basis of accounting and other guidance issued by HHS. Questioned costs – $1,566,926; Calculated as total expense charged to PRF for Period 1. Context – The Period 1 PRF report was tested. The Organization allocated salaries and employee benefits to PRF for time associated with COVID-19 prevention activities; however, these salaries and benefits were not supported as incremental and necessary costs for the prevention, preparation and response to COVID-19 and a portion of these salaries and benefits were also reimbursed by other sources. The Organization calculated lost revenues of $668,478 based on patient service revenue information from the practice management system rather than lost revenues of $946,314 based on accrual basis financial records. Effect –Based on the Period 1 PRF report filed, the Organization utilized PRF payments received on expenses and lost revenues that were not attributable to coronavirus, were reimbursed by other sources, and/or were not allowable in accordance with other guidance issued by HHS. Cause – Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution is a new program with complex and evolving regulations and compliance requirements. Internal controls were not in place to ensure the Organization correctly applied the guidance. Identification as a repeat finding – Not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Policies and procedures over allowable activities and federal grant reporting should be modified to ensure expenditures charged to grants are for activities allowed and federal grant reports are prepared using complete and accurate information.