Audit 35418

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$51.56M
Findings
2
Programs
53
Organization: Riverside Research Institute (VA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-06-15
Auditor: Bdo USA LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
35875 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - L
612317 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
12.RD Microelectronics & Embedded Systems Assurance $5.90M Yes 0
12.RD Fixed Station Sensors $3.96M Yes 0
12.RD Cobra Dane System Engineering & Integration Services $3.14M Yes 0
12.910 Virginia Contracting Activity Nmo Dcgs $2.91M Yes 0
12.RD Direct It Computational Testing & Overall Research $2.78M Yes 0
15.817 Integrated Source Management - Collection Planning $2.37M Yes 0
12.RD Big Safari 2 $2.28M Yes 0
12.RD Alion Science & Technology $1.95M Yes 0
12.RD Cgi Federal Inc. $1.88M Yes 0
12.RD Technical Sensor Radar Support Program $1.84M Yes 0
12.RD Other Contracts $1.83M Yes 0
12.RD Bae Systems $1.74M Yes 0
12.RD Advanced Novel Spectrum Warfare Environment Research $1.52M Yes 0
12.RD Red Giant $1.34M Yes 0
12.RD Optics, Plasma Technology & Electro-Magnetic Antenna $1.23M Yes 0
12.RD Rf Analysis & Verification Engineering Software $1.20M Yes 0
12.RD Mission Systems Open Architecture Science & Technology $1.19M Yes 0
12.RD Zeta Associates, Inc. $1.16M Yes 0
39.RD Facilities Directorate Support $1.13M Yes 0
12.RD Applied Research Solutions, Inc. $925,151 Yes 0
12.RD Microelectronics and Embedded System Assurance (mesa) II $886,282 Yes 0
12.RD Multi-Sensor Integration for Autonomy & Openness $812,857 Yes 0
12.RD University of Dayton $764,149 Yes 0
12.RD Virtual Combat Lab Studies & Analysis Task $746,435 Yes 0
12.RD Solis Applied Science, Lls $746,341 Yes 0
15.RD Booz Allen Hamilton $661,245 Yes 0
39.RD Advisory & Assistance Services $600,690 Yes 1
15.RD Applied Research Associates, Inc. $493,762 Yes 0
39.RD Defense Innovation Unit (diu) Subject Matter Expert/engineering $394,761 Yes 0
12.RD Neptune $369,669 Yes 0
12.RD Technical Sensor Radar Support (tsrs) Program $358,503 Yes 0
12.RD Big Safari $337,135 Yes 0
93.286 Vitreo-Retinal Disease Imaging W/3d Annular-Array Ultrasound $290,511 Yes 0
12.RD Ball Aerospace & Technologies CORP $234,423 Yes 0
12.RD Systems Planning and Analysis, Inc. $190,465 Yes 0
12.910 Universal Composability for Preventing Adversarial Composition Techniques $162,576 Yes 0
12.RD University System of Georgia - Georgia Institute of Technology $154,736 Yes 0
15.817 Cognitive Assessment System W/physiology Integration, Analysis, and $145,967 Yes 0
12.RD Analytical Graphics, Inc. $144,688 Yes 0
12.RD Parallax Advanced Research Corporation $142,471 Yes 0
12.RD Clarity Cyber, LLC $96,935 Yes 0
12.RD Dese Research, Inc. $82,213 Yes 0
39.RD Remote Sensing & Command, Control, Communications & Computers $64,746 Yes 0
93.286 Novel In-Vivo Ultrasound-Based Poc $52,769 Yes 0
12.RD Peraton $41,041 Yes 0
12.RD Secmation, LLC $38,505 Yes 0
12.RD Trusted Science and Technology, Inc. $31,519 Yes 0
12.RD Mission Systems Open Architecture Prototyping, Experimental, Demonstration (moaped) $26,996 Yes 0
12.RD Research & Development in Antenna & Electromagnetic Tech $8,064 Yes 0
93.286 In Utero Mouse Embryo Phenotyping $7,208 Yes 0
93.865 Super-Resolution Nanodrop $2,760 Yes 0
12.RD Ussocom Regional Contracting Office $2,514 Yes 0
12.RD Georgia Institute of Technology $653 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
HRH1XLHY1XJ3 Vivian Arthur Auditee
7039082135 Leslie Pine Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs 2022-001 Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance with Reporting - Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Information on the Major Federal Program ? General Services Administration Assistance Listing Number: 39.RD Assistance Listing Name: Advisory & Assistance Services Criteria - The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR ?200.510 (b) states in part: ?The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.? Condition - Certain contract expenditures related to the Advisory & Assistance Services award with General Services Administration (GSA) were incorrectly reported in the initial SEFA. The total federal expenditures initially reported in the SEFA for this award totaled $3,719,891. However, based on testing by the auditors, contract expenditures totaling $3,119,210 were determined to not qualify for SEFA presentation based on CFR Section ?200.502 due to a certain task within the award being firm fixed price. Cause ? One task of the Advisory & Assistance Services award was incorrectly labeled as cost-reimbursable with the Organization?s accounting system. This error resulted in the Organization not following its policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the requirements regarding the preparation of the SEFA. Effect or Potential Effect - Failure to comply with the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to the preparation of the SEFA could result in expenses from Federal awards being inaccurately reported. Questioned Costs - None. Context - This is a condition identified based upon our review of the Organization?s compliance with specified requirements required based on CFR ?200.502. The prevalence of these findings is detailed in the condition section above. Repeat finding ? This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation ? We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure that Federal expenditures reported on the SEFA are properly included based on underlying Federal and award requirements. Views of Responsible Officials - Management agrees with the finding. The inclusion of the contract task was an oversight as the project type was mislabeled in the accounting system. Riverside will implement an additional review of projects created in the accounting system to ensure the reliance of the information to identify only the amount of Federal awards that are required to be reported under CFR ?200.502. Additionally, the one task of the Advisory & Assistance Services award that was the cause of the issue has been corrected within the accounting system.
Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs 2022-001 Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance with Reporting - Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Information on the Major Federal Program ? General Services Administration Assistance Listing Number: 39.RD Assistance Listing Name: Advisory & Assistance Services Criteria - The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR ?200.510 (b) states in part: ?The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR ?200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.? Condition - Certain contract expenditures related to the Advisory & Assistance Services award with General Services Administration (GSA) were incorrectly reported in the initial SEFA. The total federal expenditures initially reported in the SEFA for this award totaled $3,719,891. However, based on testing by the auditors, contract expenditures totaling $3,119,210 were determined to not qualify for SEFA presentation based on CFR Section ?200.502 due to a certain task within the award being firm fixed price. Cause ? One task of the Advisory & Assistance Services award was incorrectly labeled as cost-reimbursable with the Organization?s accounting system. This error resulted in the Organization not following its policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the requirements regarding the preparation of the SEFA. Effect or Potential Effect - Failure to comply with the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance related to the preparation of the SEFA could result in expenses from Federal awards being inaccurately reported. Questioned Costs - None. Context - This is a condition identified based upon our review of the Organization?s compliance with specified requirements required based on CFR ?200.502. The prevalence of these findings is detailed in the condition section above. Repeat finding ? This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation ? We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure that Federal expenditures reported on the SEFA are properly included based on underlying Federal and award requirements. Views of Responsible Officials - Management agrees with the finding. The inclusion of the contract task was an oversight as the project type was mislabeled in the accounting system. Riverside will implement an additional review of projects created in the accounting system to ensure the reliance of the information to identify only the amount of Federal awards that are required to be reported under CFR ?200.502. Additionally, the one task of the Advisory & Assistance Services award that was the cause of the issue has been corrected within the accounting system.