2024-001 – Return of Title IV Funds (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster; Compliance Requirement Affected – Special Tests and Provisions Condition: Return of Title IV funds occurred untimely for three students, exceeding 45 days as required, when considering the University’s date of determination as reported on R2T4 forms. Criteria: Returns of Title IV funds are required to be deposited or transferred into the SFA account or electronic funds transfers initiated to the Department of Education as soon as possible, but no later than 45 days after the date the institution determines that the student withdrew in accordance with 34 CFR 668.173(b). Cause: The University does not have adequate procedures in place to ensure students’ Title IV funds are returned timely. R2T4 forms improperly reported the date of determination the same as the student withdraw date. Effect: The University failed to return Title IV funds to the Department of Education within 45 days of the students’ date of determination as reported on the R2T4 forms. Context: A sample of nine official and unofficial student withdrawals was selected for audit from a population of 63. The test found three student withdrawals that were not in compliance with timely return of funds. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the University implement procedures to ensure that R2T4 forms are filed timely and properly reflect the University’s date of determination for all student withdrawals. Management Response: The University concedes that the R2T4 forms improperly reported the date of determination as the same date reported for the student’s date of withdrawal and the University has modified its withdrawal procedures and processes to reflect separate dates when necessary for date of determination and date of withdrawal. Instructions related to R2T4 requirements and timeliness of return of funds will be triggered from the appropriate date of determination. Related to the findings above, the University failed to accurately report the date of determination on R2T4 documentation, causing the return of funds to be out of the window for timely return. Although the funds were returned in a timely manner, the recordkeeping of the determination date was not documented properly. The University has since clarified for staff the importance of this documentation and change in process. Additionally, the University has identified the appropriate test of controls needed to accurately identify the student withdrawal date. This test of controls will be run at the end of each semester, and upon completion, the date the report is run will be used as the correct date of determination.
2024-002 – Enrollment Reporting (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster; Compliance Requirement Affected – Special Tests and Provisions Condition: The University did not report student enrollment data to the National Student Clearinghouse accurately and within minimum required timeframe. Criteria: Based on requirements set forth by 34 CFR 685.309(b)(2), the University is responsible for notifying the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) to changes to student’s enrollment data within minimum required timeframes. Cause: The University does not have adequate procedures in place to ensure changes in students’ enrollment statuses are identified and reported in a timely manner. Effect: Enrollment data was not reported timely or accurately to the Department of Education thus, the Department could not properly service the student’s loans. The accuracy of Title IV student loan records depends heavily on the accuracy of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Context: A sample of nine official and unofficial student withdrawals was selected for audit from a population of 63. The test found three student withdrawals that were not in compliance with timely enrollment reporting in NSLDS, the enrollment status for one student was not updated after the student was no longer enrolled on at least a half-time basis, and one student’s enrollment status date reported to NSLDS did not agree to date of withdraw reported on the R2T4 form. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the University put procedures in place to ensure that student enrollment statuses are updated in a timely manner. Management Response: The University has modified its withdrawal procedures and instructions related to the requirements set forth by 34 CFR 685.309(b)(2). Related to the findings above, due to staffing turnover, the appropriate test of controls needed to identify changes in a student’s enrollment status was not run in a timely manner. Going forward, the University has informed related staff that the aforementioned test of controls needs to be run at the end of each semester, and upon completion, staff must notify the NSLDS within the required timeframe.
2024-003 – Lack of Timely Filing of Data Collection Form to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse Department of Education, SFA Cluster; Compliance Requirement Affected Condition: The University did not file the Data Collection Form for fiscal year 2023-2024 to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the required timeline. Criteria: A Single Audit requires the submission of the Data Collection Form to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of an auditor’s report, or nine months after the end of the audit period, unless a different period is specified in a program-specific audit guide. Cause: Staff turnover contributed to the late filing. Effect: The University did not complete their required submission to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the deadline of March 31, 2025. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the University put procedures in place to ensure timely filing of the Data Collection Form. Management Response: The University has modified its year-end audit procedures to ensure timely filing of the Data Collection Form going forward.
2024-001 – Return of Title IV Funds (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster; Compliance Requirement Affected – Special Tests and Provisions Condition: Return of Title IV funds occurred untimely for three students, exceeding 45 days as required, when considering the University’s date of determination as reported on R2T4 forms. Criteria: Returns of Title IV funds are required to be deposited or transferred into the SFA account or electronic funds transfers initiated to the Department of Education as soon as possible, but no later than 45 days after the date the institution determines that the student withdrew in accordance with 34 CFR 668.173(b). Cause: The University does not have adequate procedures in place to ensure students’ Title IV funds are returned timely. R2T4 forms improperly reported the date of determination the same as the student withdraw date. Effect: The University failed to return Title IV funds to the Department of Education within 45 days of the students’ date of determination as reported on the R2T4 forms. Context: A sample of nine official and unofficial student withdrawals was selected for audit from a population of 63. The test found three student withdrawals that were not in compliance with timely return of funds. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the University implement procedures to ensure that R2T4 forms are filed timely and properly reflect the University’s date of determination for all student withdrawals. Management Response: The University concedes that the R2T4 forms improperly reported the date of determination as the same date reported for the student’s date of withdrawal and the University has modified its withdrawal procedures and processes to reflect separate dates when necessary for date of determination and date of withdrawal. Instructions related to R2T4 requirements and timeliness of return of funds will be triggered from the appropriate date of determination. Related to the findings above, the University failed to accurately report the date of determination on R2T4 documentation, causing the return of funds to be out of the window for timely return. Although the funds were returned in a timely manner, the recordkeeping of the determination date was not documented properly. The University has since clarified for staff the importance of this documentation and change in process. Additionally, the University has identified the appropriate test of controls needed to accurately identify the student withdrawal date. This test of controls will be run at the end of each semester, and upon completion, the date the report is run will be used as the correct date of determination.
2024-002 – Enrollment Reporting (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster; Compliance Requirement Affected – Special Tests and Provisions Condition: The University did not report student enrollment data to the National Student Clearinghouse accurately and within minimum required timeframe. Criteria: Based on requirements set forth by 34 CFR 685.309(b)(2), the University is responsible for notifying the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) to changes to student’s enrollment data within minimum required timeframes. Cause: The University does not have adequate procedures in place to ensure changes in students’ enrollment statuses are identified and reported in a timely manner. Effect: Enrollment data was not reported timely or accurately to the Department of Education thus, the Department could not properly service the student’s loans. The accuracy of Title IV student loan records depends heavily on the accuracy of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Context: A sample of nine official and unofficial student withdrawals was selected for audit from a population of 63. The test found three student withdrawals that were not in compliance with timely enrollment reporting in NSLDS, the enrollment status for one student was not updated after the student was no longer enrolled on at least a half-time basis, and one student’s enrollment status date reported to NSLDS did not agree to date of withdraw reported on the R2T4 form. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the University put procedures in place to ensure that student enrollment statuses are updated in a timely manner. Management Response: The University has modified its withdrawal procedures and instructions related to the requirements set forth by 34 CFR 685.309(b)(2). Related to the findings above, due to staffing turnover, the appropriate test of controls needed to identify changes in a student’s enrollment status was not run in a timely manner. Going forward, the University has informed related staff that the aforementioned test of controls needs to be run at the end of each semester, and upon completion, staff must notify the NSLDS within the required timeframe.
2024-003 – Lack of Timely Filing of Data Collection Form to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse Department of Education, SFA Cluster; Compliance Requirement Affected Condition: The University did not file the Data Collection Form for fiscal year 2023-2024 to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the required timeline. Criteria: A Single Audit requires the submission of the Data Collection Form to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of an auditor’s report, or nine months after the end of the audit period, unless a different period is specified in a program-specific audit guide. Cause: Staff turnover contributed to the late filing. Effect: The University did not complete their required submission to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the deadline of March 31, 2025. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the University put procedures in place to ensure timely filing of the Data Collection Form. Management Response: The University has modified its year-end audit procedures to ensure timely filing of the Data Collection Form going forward.