Audit 353595

FY End
2024-08-31
Total Expended
$1.48M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-04-14
Auditor: Eide Bailly LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
554986 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
1131428 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - AB

Contacts

Name Title Type
MELRQG71F5W7 Valarie Howard Auditee
2708255781 Ashley Brandt-Duda Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Baptist Health Deaconess, LLC and Affiliates (BHD, LLC) under programs of the federal government for the year ended August 31, 2024. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of BHD, LLC, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of BHD, LLC. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: Both Rate Explanation: BHD, LLC does draw for indirect administrative expenses, but has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Department of the Health and Human Services Federal Assistance Listing #93.912 Rural Health Care Services Outreach, Rural Health Network Development and Small Health Care Provider Quality Improvement Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Condition: BHD, LLC calculated their indirect cost rate based on the total grant budget and claimed an equal amount of indirect costs per month instead of calculating the indirect cost rate per direct expenditures for each month. Cause: BHD, LLC did not have an internal control process in place to ensure the correct amounts of indirect costs were requested based on the direct costs for the same period. Effect: Without an effective internal control process in place, improper costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 4 out of 12 indirect expenditures were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend BHD, LLC enhance internal control procedures to ensure the indirect cost rate is applied against the monthly direct costs when requesting program reimbursements. Views of Responsible Officials: Historically, the indirect cost received by this grant has not been dependent of the direct expenditures. Based on verbal conversations with the HRSA grant project manager, requesting reimbursement for the indirect costs evenly over the year based on the budget submitted was acceptable. Therefore, the accounting treatment has been reflective of that.
Department of the Health and Human Services Federal Assistance Listing #93.912 Rural Health Care Services Outreach, Rural Health Network Development and Small Health Care Provider Quality Improvement Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Condition: BHD, LLC calculated their indirect cost rate based on the total grant budget and claimed an equal amount of indirect costs per month instead of calculating the indirect cost rate per direct expenditures for each month. Cause: BHD, LLC did not have an internal control process in place to ensure the correct amounts of indirect costs were requested based on the direct costs for the same period. Effect: Without an effective internal control process in place, improper costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 4 out of 12 indirect expenditures were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend BHD, LLC enhance internal control procedures to ensure the indirect cost rate is applied against the monthly direct costs when requesting program reimbursements. Views of Responsible Officials: Historically, the indirect cost received by this grant has not been dependent of the direct expenditures. Based on verbal conversations with the HRSA grant project manager, requesting reimbursement for the indirect costs evenly over the year based on the budget submitted was acceptable. Therefore, the accounting treatment has been reflective of that.