Audit 352732

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.62M
Findings
4
Programs
12
Organization: M.s.a.d. No 70 (ME)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-04-04

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
554078 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes AB
554079 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes AB
1130520 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes AB
1130521 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes AB

Contacts

Name Title Type
R86AFJTRQLR3 Catrina Kemp Auditee
2075233015 Nichol Solomon Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and/or OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Regional School Unit No. 70 has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2024-001 – Allowed/Unallowed Activities/Costs Federal Program Information: Department of Education CFDA - 84.010A - Title I Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.303 and 2 CFR 200.430 g Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Unit charged unallowable costs to the grant. It was also identified that the unit is incorrectly documenting wages. Cause: The Unit does not have the necessary internal controls over compliance. Effect: The Unit is not ensuring that staff has the appropriate compliance knowledge on allowable and unallowable costs to minimize the inherent risk of unallowable charges to the grant, which could result in return of funding. Of the 5 disbursements reviewed and tested 2 were for unallowable costs that had been charged to the grant. The unit is not consistent with wage documentation which can result in incorrect amounts being paid to personnel. Of the 25 samples reviewed, two staff did not have wage rates documented in the file of which one of them was paid according to the Collective Bargaining Agreement, however the amount paid was incorrect and there is no documentation for the employee who worked just for the summer. Another employee’s contract stated the incorrect salary but was correctly stated in the payroll system. Lastly one hourly employee’s pay was prorated when it shouldn’t have been resulting in an overpayment. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: Of a population of 12 AP samples 5 were examined and tested and of a population of 56 payroll samples 25 were examined and tested. This is not a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2023-002 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Unit implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the unit stays in compliance with allowable costs and activities and correct and accurate documentation is being maintained and recorded. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Please see the Corrective Action Plan.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2024-001 – Allowed/Unallowed Activities/Costs Federal Program Information: Department of Education CFDA - 84.010A - Title I Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.303 and 2 CFR 200.430 g Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Unit charged unallowable costs to the grant. It was also identified that the unit is incorrectly documenting wages. Cause: The Unit does not have the necessary internal controls over compliance. Effect: The Unit is not ensuring that staff has the appropriate compliance knowledge on allowable and unallowable costs to minimize the inherent risk of unallowable charges to the grant, which could result in return of funding. Of the 5 disbursements reviewed and tested 2 were for unallowable costs that had been charged to the grant. The unit is not consistent with wage documentation which can result in incorrect amounts being paid to personnel. Of the 25 samples reviewed, two staff did not have wage rates documented in the file of which one of them was paid according to the Collective Bargaining Agreement, however the amount paid was incorrect and there is no documentation for the employee who worked just for the summer. Another employee’s contract stated the incorrect salary but was correctly stated in the payroll system. Lastly one hourly employee’s pay was prorated when it shouldn’t have been resulting in an overpayment. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: Of a population of 12 AP samples 5 were examined and tested and of a population of 56 payroll samples 25 were examined and tested. This is not a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2023-002 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Unit implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the unit stays in compliance with allowable costs and activities and correct and accurate documentation is being maintained and recorded. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Please see the Corrective Action Plan.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2024-001 – Allowed/Unallowed Activities/Costs Federal Program Information: Department of Education CFDA - 84.010A - Title I Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.303 and 2 CFR 200.430 g Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Unit charged unallowable costs to the grant. It was also identified that the unit is incorrectly documenting wages. Cause: The Unit does not have the necessary internal controls over compliance. Effect: The Unit is not ensuring that staff has the appropriate compliance knowledge on allowable and unallowable costs to minimize the inherent risk of unallowable charges to the grant, which could result in return of funding. Of the 5 disbursements reviewed and tested 2 were for unallowable costs that had been charged to the grant. The unit is not consistent with wage documentation which can result in incorrect amounts being paid to personnel. Of the 25 samples reviewed, two staff did not have wage rates documented in the file of which one of them was paid according to the Collective Bargaining Agreement, however the amount paid was incorrect and there is no documentation for the employee who worked just for the summer. Another employee’s contract stated the incorrect salary but was correctly stated in the payroll system. Lastly one hourly employee’s pay was prorated when it shouldn’t have been resulting in an overpayment. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: Of a population of 12 AP samples 5 were examined and tested and of a population of 56 payroll samples 25 were examined and tested. This is not a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2023-002 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Unit implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the unit stays in compliance with allowable costs and activities and correct and accurate documentation is being maintained and recorded. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Please see the Corrective Action Plan.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2024-001 – Allowed/Unallowed Activities/Costs Federal Program Information: Department of Education CFDA - 84.010A - Title I Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.303 and 2 CFR 200.430 g Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Unit charged unallowable costs to the grant. It was also identified that the unit is incorrectly documenting wages. Cause: The Unit does not have the necessary internal controls over compliance. Effect: The Unit is not ensuring that staff has the appropriate compliance knowledge on allowable and unallowable costs to minimize the inherent risk of unallowable charges to the grant, which could result in return of funding. Of the 5 disbursements reviewed and tested 2 were for unallowable costs that had been charged to the grant. The unit is not consistent with wage documentation which can result in incorrect amounts being paid to personnel. Of the 25 samples reviewed, two staff did not have wage rates documented in the file of which one of them was paid according to the Collective Bargaining Agreement, however the amount paid was incorrect and there is no documentation for the employee who worked just for the summer. Another employee’s contract stated the incorrect salary but was correctly stated in the payroll system. Lastly one hourly employee’s pay was prorated when it shouldn’t have been resulting in an overpayment. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: Of a population of 12 AP samples 5 were examined and tested and of a population of 56 payroll samples 25 were examined and tested. This is not a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2023-002 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Unit implements internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the unit stays in compliance with allowable costs and activities and correct and accurate documentation is being maintained and recorded. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Please see the Corrective Action Plan.