Audit 352009

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$13.77M
Findings
12
Programs
9
Organization: Wilberforce University (OH)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-31

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
548686 2024-005 Significant Deficiency Yes N
548687 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes CL
548688 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes CL
548689 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes CL
548690 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes CL
548691 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes CL
1125128 2024-005 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1125129 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes CL
1125130 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes CL
1125131 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes CL
1125132 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes CL
1125133 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes CL

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $3.92M Yes 1
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $3.45M Yes 0
84.031 Higher Education Institutional Aid $1.58M - 1
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $1.40M Yes 0
11.028 Connecting Minority Communities Pilot Program $997,062 Yes 1
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $886,646 Yes 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $617,763 - 1
84.382 Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions $510,213 - 1
84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program_federal Capital Contributions $96,018 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
K4SXRG3EDHJ6 Alfred L. Norris Auditee
9377085546 Tony Clausell Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: MAJOR PROGRAMS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the other comprehensive basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee used the rate allowed by the Department of Education for campus based aid. The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards was prepared under the provisions of Uniform Guidance. Federal programs are classified as either "major" or "non-major". Under the Uniform Guidance, a risk-based approach shall be used to determine which Federal programs are major. This risk-based approach includes consideration of current and prior audit experience, oversight by Federal agencies and pass-through entities, and the inherent risk of the Federal program. Federal programs are labeled as Type A or Type B programs. Type A programs are defined as Federal programs with Federal award expenditures exceeding $750,000, based on the current year’s level of federal expenditures. All other Federal awards are labeled as Type B programs.
Title: FEDERAL STUDENT LOAN PROGRAMS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the other comprehensive basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee used the rate allowed by the Department of Education for campus based aid. The federal student loan programs listed subsequently are administered directly by the University, and balances and transactions relating to these programs are included in the University's basic financial statements. Loans outstanding at the beginning of the year and loans made during the year are included in the federal expenditures presented in the schedule. The above federal awards programs were combined with other student financial assistance to form the category of the student financial assistance cluster. The student financial assistance cluster total is then compared to $750,000 to determine whether the cluster is a Type A program. The threshold can change based on the level of federal expenditures for the year. However, the total value attributed to the loan program was excluded in determining other Type A programs. In accordance with the Uniform Guidance, major programs were determined based on the Risk-Based Approach (See Note B).
Title: LOANS OUTSTANDING Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the other comprehensive basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee used the rate allowed by the Department of Education for campus based aid. The University is responsible for the performance of certain administrative and compliance duties with respect to the guaranteed loan programs. It is not practical to determine the balance of loans outstanding to students and former students of the University under the programs for the year ended June 30, 2024. These loans are not included in the University's financial statements. The financial impact of these outstanding loans are reflected, however, in the University's cohort default rate. The University's latest cohort default rate for the Federak Direct Loan Program is not currently available.
Title: RECONCILIATION OF THE SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL EXPENDITURES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the other comprehensive basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee used the rate allowed by the Department of Education for campus based aid. See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table.

Finding Details

Condition: When the Registrar’s Office discovers that a student did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis, the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) should be notified of the change in the student’s enrollment status within thirty days of the occurrence, unless the Institution expects to complete its next scheduled filing within sixty days. During our audit, we noted twelve (12) instances in which student status changes were reported more than sixty (60) days after the occurrence. Context: A haphazard selection of fourteen (14) students was made from the list of student withdrawals and graduates during the year. Criteria: Federal regulations require the Institution to notify the NSLDS of a change in student status (i.e., withdrawn, graduated, enrolled less than half-time, etc.). Unless the Institution expects to complete its next filing within sixty days, the Institution must notify the NSLDS within thirty days if it discovers a student with an outstanding federal loan balance has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis. [34 CFR 685.309] Effect: The lender or guaranty agency is not receiving prompt notification of changes in borrower’s enrollment status. This results in delayed processing of loan repayment periods and leads to poor default management. Late or incorrect updates to the NSLDS may also cause students to receive loans for which they are not eligible, as half-time enrollment is a requirement for Federal Direct Loan (FDL) eligibility. Cause: Necessary withdrawal documentation is not consistently processed and forwarded to appropriate departments in a timely manner to ensure reports are accurately filed as scheduled. Overall, there is an inadequate process of verifying the enrollment status of students. Recommendation: The Institution should implement procedures to ensure compliance with federal regulations. The Registrar’s Office should obtain a complete understanding of the NSLDS reporting requirements. Improving the accuracy and timeliness of student status filings will aid in the transition of students to loan repayment status. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the auditors and has initiated the necessary corrective action plan to mitigate the deficiency from occurring again. The plan is to implement new procedures to ensure the reporting to the NSLDS is done on a timely basis. Implementation date: Immediately and no later than June 30, 2025. Persons Responsible: Vice President of Business & Finance, the Registrars Office and the Director of Student Financial Aid.
Condition: Good internal controls over the receipt of federal funds require the reconciliation of authorized and recorded disbursements of cash drawn from the federal cash management system. This process ensures that federal funds are properly earned by the University and the University has not made a disbursement for which it has not been funded. During our audit, we noted that the University made efforts to reconcile its program activity under the COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (American Rescue Plan - HEERF-III), Higher Educational Institutional Aid (Title III), Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. However, we did not see evidence that the reconciliation of HEERF funding, Title III program activity, Strengthening Minority -Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program is performed regularly as part of the University’s monthly and annual close-out. As a result, we noted the following: • The proper reconciliation of funds disbursed as allowed by the HEERF III program requires reconciliation of the funds drawn and disbursed for each assistant listing portion (1) a reconciliation of funds disbursed to students directly (student aid portion) and funds disbursed for other allowable expenditures to the general ledger, (2) a reconciliation to the disbursement for general operating purposes and loss revenue to the approved and documented methodology and the general ledger accounts and (3) all funds requested via the G-5 reports should be accurately reconciled to the general ledger and to the various detail reports supporting the disbursements. This procedures also extends to the funds received from the Department of Commerce. The reconciliations should be summarized and reported quarterly and annually as required by the CARES Act (See HEERF Reporting web page) and other funding sources. • Financial statement adjustments were needed to properly recognize the cash balance for the Title III program, Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and other programs. The reconciliation process, as outlined in the internal control procedures is not performed in a timely manner. Context: Review of cash management procedures related to the HEERF ,Title III-Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. Criteria: Standards for financial management systems [2 CFR §215.21] and CARES Act 18004 (ARP). Effect: The effect is that unresolved balances could represent excess cash due back to the U.S. Department of Education, or not receipting funds that are due to the University for students who have obtained their education. The failure to not meeting he three components of reporting for HEERF as required by the CARES Act and ARP. Deficiency in reporting as required by the Department of Commerce. Cause: Weaknesses in procedures over reconciliation of grant activity. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that federal program activity is reconciled on a monthly basis for all open award years. This process should be coordinated between all affected departments (i.e., Grants and Contracts, Accounting Department, Sponsored Programs, Student Financial Aid, etc.). The reconciled amounts should properly reflect amounts due to or from the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Commerce on the University’s general ledger accounting system. The reconciliations should be reviewed by a responsible official of the University. Monitoring of such reconciliation and the reporting requirements should be evidenced by internal control procedures and proper documentation of authorization. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the auditor’s finding. The University has engaged a third party to review the reconciliation procedures and to make recommendations on improvements to our current policy. The recommendations will also include any additional documentation that showing proof that the reconciliation has been completed as timely as required. The Vice President of Business & Finance and the Director of Student Financial Aid will review the reconciliations. Monitoring reports will be completed and shared with senior management and relevant department leaders. Implementation date: Immediately and before June 30, 2025. Persons Responsible: Vice President of Business & Finance, controller and Director of Student Financial Aid.
Condition: Good internal controls over the receipt of federal funds require the reconciliation of authorized and recorded disbursements of cash drawn from the federal cash management system. This process ensures that federal funds are properly earned by the University and the University has not made a disbursement for which it has not been funded. During our audit, we noted that the University made efforts to reconcile its program activity under the COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (American Rescue Plan - HEERF-III), Higher Educational Institutional Aid (Title III), Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. However, we did not see evidence that the reconciliation of HEERF funding, Title III program activity, Strengthening Minority -Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program is performed regularly as part of the University’s monthly and annual close-out. As a result, we noted the following: • The proper reconciliation of funds disbursed as allowed by the HEERF III program requires reconciliation of the funds drawn and disbursed for each assistant listing portion (1) a reconciliation of funds disbursed to students directly (student aid portion) and funds disbursed for other allowable expenditures to the general ledger, (2) a reconciliation to the disbursement for general operating purposes and loss revenue to the approved and documented methodology and the general ledger accounts and (3) all funds requested via the G-5 reports should be accurately reconciled to the general ledger and to the various detail reports supporting the disbursements. This procedures also extends to the funds received from the Department of Commerce. The reconciliations should be summarized and reported quarterly and annually as required by the CARES Act (See HEERF Reporting web page) and other funding sources. • Financial statement adjustments were needed to properly recognize the cash balance for the Title III program, Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and other programs. The reconciliation process, as outlined in the internal control procedures is not performed in a timely manner. Context: Review of cash management procedures related to the HEERF ,Title III-Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. Criteria: Standards for financial management systems [2 CFR §215.21] and CARES Act 18004 (ARP). Effect: The effect is that unresolved balances could represent excess cash due back to the U.S. Department of Education, or not receipting funds that are due to the University for students who have obtained their education. The failure to not meeting he three components of reporting for HEERF as required by the CARES Act and ARP. Deficiency in reporting as required by the Department of Commerce. Cause: Weaknesses in procedures over reconciliation of grant activity. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that federal program activity is reconciled on a monthly basis for all open award years. This process should be coordinated between all affected departments (i.e., Grants and Contracts, Accounting Department, Sponsored Programs, Student Financial Aid, etc.). The reconciled amounts should properly reflect amounts due to or from the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Commerce on the University’s general ledger accounting system. The reconciliations should be reviewed by a responsible official of the University. Monitoring of such reconciliation and the reporting requirements should be evidenced by internal control procedures and proper documentation of authorization. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the auditor’s finding. The University has engaged a third party to review the reconciliation procedures and to make recommendations on improvements to our current policy. The recommendations will also include any additional documentation that showing proof that the reconciliation has been completed as timely as required. The Vice President of Business & Finance and the Director of Student Financial Aid will review the reconciliations. Monitoring reports will be completed and shared with senior management and relevant department leaders. Implementation date: Immediately and before June 30, 2025. Persons Responsible: Vice President of Business & Finance, controller and Director of Student Financial Aid.
Condition: Good internal controls over the receipt of federal funds require the reconciliation of authorized and recorded disbursements of cash drawn from the federal cash management system. This process ensures that federal funds are properly earned by the University and the University has not made a disbursement for which it has not been funded. During our audit, we noted that the University made efforts to reconcile its program activity under the COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (American Rescue Plan - HEERF-III), Higher Educational Institutional Aid (Title III), Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. However, we did not see evidence that the reconciliation of HEERF funding, Title III program activity, Strengthening Minority -Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program is performed regularly as part of the University’s monthly and annual close-out. As a result, we noted the following: • The proper reconciliation of funds disbursed as allowed by the HEERF III program requires reconciliation of the funds drawn and disbursed for each assistant listing portion (1) a reconciliation of funds disbursed to students directly (student aid portion) and funds disbursed for other allowable expenditures to the general ledger, (2) a reconciliation to the disbursement for general operating purposes and loss revenue to the approved and documented methodology and the general ledger accounts and (3) all funds requested via the G-5 reports should be accurately reconciled to the general ledger and to the various detail reports supporting the disbursements. This procedures also extends to the funds received from the Department of Commerce. The reconciliations should be summarized and reported quarterly and annually as required by the CARES Act (See HEERF Reporting web page) and other funding sources. • Financial statement adjustments were needed to properly recognize the cash balance for the Title III program, Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and other programs. The reconciliation process, as outlined in the internal control procedures is not performed in a timely manner. Context: Review of cash management procedures related to the HEERF ,Title III-Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. Criteria: Standards for financial management systems [2 CFR §215.21] and CARES Act 18004 (ARP). Effect: The effect is that unresolved balances could represent excess cash due back to the U.S. Department of Education, or not receipting funds that are due to the University for students who have obtained their education. The failure to not meeting he three components of reporting for HEERF as required by the CARES Act and ARP. Deficiency in reporting as required by the Department of Commerce. Cause: Weaknesses in procedures over reconciliation of grant activity. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that federal program activity is reconciled on a monthly basis for all open award years. This process should be coordinated between all affected departments (i.e., Grants and Contracts, Accounting Department, Sponsored Programs, Student Financial Aid, etc.). The reconciled amounts should properly reflect amounts due to or from the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Commerce on the University’s general ledger accounting system. The reconciliations should be reviewed by a responsible official of the University. Monitoring of such reconciliation and the reporting requirements should be evidenced by internal control procedures and proper documentation of authorization. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the auditor’s finding. The University has engaged a third party to review the reconciliation procedures and to make recommendations on improvements to our current policy. The recommendations will also include any additional documentation that showing proof that the reconciliation has been completed as timely as required. The Vice President of Business & Finance and the Director of Student Financial Aid will review the reconciliations. Monitoring reports will be completed and shared with senior management and relevant department leaders. Implementation date: Immediately and before June 30, 2025. Persons Responsible: Vice President of Business & Finance, controller and Director of Student Financial Aid.
Condition: Good internal controls over the receipt of federal funds require the reconciliation of authorized and recorded disbursements of cash drawn from the federal cash management system. This process ensures that federal funds are properly earned by the University and the University has not made a disbursement for which it has not been funded. During our audit, we noted that the University made efforts to reconcile its program activity under the COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (American Rescue Plan - HEERF-III), Higher Educational Institutional Aid (Title III), Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. However, we did not see evidence that the reconciliation of HEERF funding, Title III program activity, Strengthening Minority -Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program is performed regularly as part of the University’s monthly and annual close-out. As a result, we noted the following: • The proper reconciliation of funds disbursed as allowed by the HEERF III program requires reconciliation of the funds drawn and disbursed for each assistant listing portion (1) a reconciliation of funds disbursed to students directly (student aid portion) and funds disbursed for other allowable expenditures to the general ledger, (2) a reconciliation to the disbursement for general operating purposes and loss revenue to the approved and documented methodology and the general ledger accounts and (3) all funds requested via the G-5 reports should be accurately reconciled to the general ledger and to the various detail reports supporting the disbursements. This procedures also extends to the funds received from the Department of Commerce. The reconciliations should be summarized and reported quarterly and annually as required by the CARES Act (See HEERF Reporting web page) and other funding sources. • Financial statement adjustments were needed to properly recognize the cash balance for the Title III program, Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and other programs. The reconciliation process, as outlined in the internal control procedures is not performed in a timely manner. Context: Review of cash management procedures related to the HEERF ,Title III-Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. Criteria: Standards for financial management systems [2 CFR §215.21] and CARES Act 18004 (ARP). Effect: The effect is that unresolved balances could represent excess cash due back to the U.S. Department of Education, or not receipting funds that are due to the University for students who have obtained their education. The failure to not meeting he three components of reporting for HEERF as required by the CARES Act and ARP. Deficiency in reporting as required by the Department of Commerce. Cause: Weaknesses in procedures over reconciliation of grant activity. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that federal program activity is reconciled on a monthly basis for all open award years. This process should be coordinated between all affected departments (i.e., Grants and Contracts, Accounting Department, Sponsored Programs, Student Financial Aid, etc.). The reconciled amounts should properly reflect amounts due to or from the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Commerce on the University’s general ledger accounting system. The reconciliations should be reviewed by a responsible official of the University. Monitoring of such reconciliation and the reporting requirements should be evidenced by internal control procedures and proper documentation of authorization. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the auditor’s finding. The University has engaged a third party to review the reconciliation procedures and to make recommendations on improvements to our current policy. The recommendations will also include any additional documentation that showing proof that the reconciliation has been completed as timely as required. The Vice President of Business & Finance and the Director of Student Financial Aid will review the reconciliations. Monitoring reports will be completed and shared with senior management and relevant department leaders. Implementation date: Immediately and before June 30, 2025. Persons Responsible: Vice President of Business & Finance, controller and Director of Student Financial Aid.
Condition: Good internal controls over the receipt of federal funds require the reconciliation of authorized and recorded disbursements of cash drawn from the federal cash management system. This process ensures that federal funds are properly earned by the University and the University has not made a disbursement for which it has not been funded. During our audit, we noted that the University made efforts to reconcile its program activity under the COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (American Rescue Plan - HEERF-III), Higher Educational Institutional Aid (Title III), Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. However, we did not see evidence that the reconciliation of HEERF funding, Title III program activity, Strengthening Minority -Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program is performed regularly as part of the University’s monthly and annual close-out. As a result, we noted the following: • The proper reconciliation of funds disbursed as allowed by the HEERF III program requires reconciliation of the funds drawn and disbursed for each assistant listing portion (1) a reconciliation of funds disbursed to students directly (student aid portion) and funds disbursed for other allowable expenditures to the general ledger, (2) a reconciliation to the disbursement for general operating purposes and loss revenue to the approved and documented methodology and the general ledger accounts and (3) all funds requested via the G-5 reports should be accurately reconciled to the general ledger and to the various detail reports supporting the disbursements. This procedures also extends to the funds received from the Department of Commerce. The reconciliations should be summarized and reported quarterly and annually as required by the CARES Act (See HEERF Reporting web page) and other funding sources. • Financial statement adjustments were needed to properly recognize the cash balance for the Title III program, Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and other programs. The reconciliation process, as outlined in the internal control procedures is not performed in a timely manner. Context: Review of cash management procedures related to the HEERF ,Title III-Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. Criteria: Standards for financial management systems [2 CFR §215.21] and CARES Act 18004 (ARP). Effect: The effect is that unresolved balances could represent excess cash due back to the U.S. Department of Education, or not receipting funds that are due to the University for students who have obtained their education. The failure to not meeting he three components of reporting for HEERF as required by the CARES Act and ARP. Deficiency in reporting as required by the Department of Commerce. Cause: Weaknesses in procedures over reconciliation of grant activity. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that federal program activity is reconciled on a monthly basis for all open award years. This process should be coordinated between all affected departments (i.e., Grants and Contracts, Accounting Department, Sponsored Programs, Student Financial Aid, etc.). The reconciled amounts should properly reflect amounts due to or from the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Commerce on the University’s general ledger accounting system. The reconciliations should be reviewed by a responsible official of the University. Monitoring of such reconciliation and the reporting requirements should be evidenced by internal control procedures and proper documentation of authorization. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the auditor’s finding. The University has engaged a third party to review the reconciliation procedures and to make recommendations on improvements to our current policy. The recommendations will also include any additional documentation that showing proof that the reconciliation has been completed as timely as required. The Vice President of Business & Finance and the Director of Student Financial Aid will review the reconciliations. Monitoring reports will be completed and shared with senior management and relevant department leaders. Implementation date: Immediately and before June 30, 2025. Persons Responsible: Vice President of Business & Finance, controller and Director of Student Financial Aid.
Condition: When the Registrar’s Office discovers that a student did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis, the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) should be notified of the change in the student’s enrollment status within thirty days of the occurrence, unless the Institution expects to complete its next scheduled filing within sixty days. During our audit, we noted twelve (12) instances in which student status changes were reported more than sixty (60) days after the occurrence. Context: A haphazard selection of fourteen (14) students was made from the list of student withdrawals and graduates during the year. Criteria: Federal regulations require the Institution to notify the NSLDS of a change in student status (i.e., withdrawn, graduated, enrolled less than half-time, etc.). Unless the Institution expects to complete its next filing within sixty days, the Institution must notify the NSLDS within thirty days if it discovers a student with an outstanding federal loan balance has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis. [34 CFR 685.309] Effect: The lender or guaranty agency is not receiving prompt notification of changes in borrower’s enrollment status. This results in delayed processing of loan repayment periods and leads to poor default management. Late or incorrect updates to the NSLDS may also cause students to receive loans for which they are not eligible, as half-time enrollment is a requirement for Federal Direct Loan (FDL) eligibility. Cause: Necessary withdrawal documentation is not consistently processed and forwarded to appropriate departments in a timely manner to ensure reports are accurately filed as scheduled. Overall, there is an inadequate process of verifying the enrollment status of students. Recommendation: The Institution should implement procedures to ensure compliance with federal regulations. The Registrar’s Office should obtain a complete understanding of the NSLDS reporting requirements. Improving the accuracy and timeliness of student status filings will aid in the transition of students to loan repayment status. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the auditors and has initiated the necessary corrective action plan to mitigate the deficiency from occurring again. The plan is to implement new procedures to ensure the reporting to the NSLDS is done on a timely basis. Implementation date: Immediately and no later than June 30, 2025. Persons Responsible: Vice President of Business & Finance, the Registrars Office and the Director of Student Financial Aid.
Condition: Good internal controls over the receipt of federal funds require the reconciliation of authorized and recorded disbursements of cash drawn from the federal cash management system. This process ensures that federal funds are properly earned by the University and the University has not made a disbursement for which it has not been funded. During our audit, we noted that the University made efforts to reconcile its program activity under the COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (American Rescue Plan - HEERF-III), Higher Educational Institutional Aid (Title III), Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. However, we did not see evidence that the reconciliation of HEERF funding, Title III program activity, Strengthening Minority -Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program is performed regularly as part of the University’s monthly and annual close-out. As a result, we noted the following: • The proper reconciliation of funds disbursed as allowed by the HEERF III program requires reconciliation of the funds drawn and disbursed for each assistant listing portion (1) a reconciliation of funds disbursed to students directly (student aid portion) and funds disbursed for other allowable expenditures to the general ledger, (2) a reconciliation to the disbursement for general operating purposes and loss revenue to the approved and documented methodology and the general ledger accounts and (3) all funds requested via the G-5 reports should be accurately reconciled to the general ledger and to the various detail reports supporting the disbursements. This procedures also extends to the funds received from the Department of Commerce. The reconciliations should be summarized and reported quarterly and annually as required by the CARES Act (See HEERF Reporting web page) and other funding sources. • Financial statement adjustments were needed to properly recognize the cash balance for the Title III program, Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and other programs. The reconciliation process, as outlined in the internal control procedures is not performed in a timely manner. Context: Review of cash management procedures related to the HEERF ,Title III-Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. Criteria: Standards for financial management systems [2 CFR §215.21] and CARES Act 18004 (ARP). Effect: The effect is that unresolved balances could represent excess cash due back to the U.S. Department of Education, or not receipting funds that are due to the University for students who have obtained their education. The failure to not meeting he three components of reporting for HEERF as required by the CARES Act and ARP. Deficiency in reporting as required by the Department of Commerce. Cause: Weaknesses in procedures over reconciliation of grant activity. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that federal program activity is reconciled on a monthly basis for all open award years. This process should be coordinated between all affected departments (i.e., Grants and Contracts, Accounting Department, Sponsored Programs, Student Financial Aid, etc.). The reconciled amounts should properly reflect amounts due to or from the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Commerce on the University’s general ledger accounting system. The reconciliations should be reviewed by a responsible official of the University. Monitoring of such reconciliation and the reporting requirements should be evidenced by internal control procedures and proper documentation of authorization. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the auditor’s finding. The University has engaged a third party to review the reconciliation procedures and to make recommendations on improvements to our current policy. The recommendations will also include any additional documentation that showing proof that the reconciliation has been completed as timely as required. The Vice President of Business & Finance and the Director of Student Financial Aid will review the reconciliations. Monitoring reports will be completed and shared with senior management and relevant department leaders. Implementation date: Immediately and before June 30, 2025. Persons Responsible: Vice President of Business & Finance, controller and Director of Student Financial Aid.
Condition: Good internal controls over the receipt of federal funds require the reconciliation of authorized and recorded disbursements of cash drawn from the federal cash management system. This process ensures that federal funds are properly earned by the University and the University has not made a disbursement for which it has not been funded. During our audit, we noted that the University made efforts to reconcile its program activity under the COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (American Rescue Plan - HEERF-III), Higher Educational Institutional Aid (Title III), Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. However, we did not see evidence that the reconciliation of HEERF funding, Title III program activity, Strengthening Minority -Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program is performed regularly as part of the University’s monthly and annual close-out. As a result, we noted the following: • The proper reconciliation of funds disbursed as allowed by the HEERF III program requires reconciliation of the funds drawn and disbursed for each assistant listing portion (1) a reconciliation of funds disbursed to students directly (student aid portion) and funds disbursed for other allowable expenditures to the general ledger, (2) a reconciliation to the disbursement for general operating purposes and loss revenue to the approved and documented methodology and the general ledger accounts and (3) all funds requested via the G-5 reports should be accurately reconciled to the general ledger and to the various detail reports supporting the disbursements. This procedures also extends to the funds received from the Department of Commerce. The reconciliations should be summarized and reported quarterly and annually as required by the CARES Act (See HEERF Reporting web page) and other funding sources. • Financial statement adjustments were needed to properly recognize the cash balance for the Title III program, Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and other programs. The reconciliation process, as outlined in the internal control procedures is not performed in a timely manner. Context: Review of cash management procedures related to the HEERF ,Title III-Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. Criteria: Standards for financial management systems [2 CFR §215.21] and CARES Act 18004 (ARP). Effect: The effect is that unresolved balances could represent excess cash due back to the U.S. Department of Education, or not receipting funds that are due to the University for students who have obtained their education. The failure to not meeting he three components of reporting for HEERF as required by the CARES Act and ARP. Deficiency in reporting as required by the Department of Commerce. Cause: Weaknesses in procedures over reconciliation of grant activity. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that federal program activity is reconciled on a monthly basis for all open award years. This process should be coordinated between all affected departments (i.e., Grants and Contracts, Accounting Department, Sponsored Programs, Student Financial Aid, etc.). The reconciled amounts should properly reflect amounts due to or from the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Commerce on the University’s general ledger accounting system. The reconciliations should be reviewed by a responsible official of the University. Monitoring of such reconciliation and the reporting requirements should be evidenced by internal control procedures and proper documentation of authorization. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the auditor’s finding. The University has engaged a third party to review the reconciliation procedures and to make recommendations on improvements to our current policy. The recommendations will also include any additional documentation that showing proof that the reconciliation has been completed as timely as required. The Vice President of Business & Finance and the Director of Student Financial Aid will review the reconciliations. Monitoring reports will be completed and shared with senior management and relevant department leaders. Implementation date: Immediately and before June 30, 2025. Persons Responsible: Vice President of Business & Finance, controller and Director of Student Financial Aid.
Condition: Good internal controls over the receipt of federal funds require the reconciliation of authorized and recorded disbursements of cash drawn from the federal cash management system. This process ensures that federal funds are properly earned by the University and the University has not made a disbursement for which it has not been funded. During our audit, we noted that the University made efforts to reconcile its program activity under the COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (American Rescue Plan - HEERF-III), Higher Educational Institutional Aid (Title III), Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. However, we did not see evidence that the reconciliation of HEERF funding, Title III program activity, Strengthening Minority -Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program is performed regularly as part of the University’s monthly and annual close-out. As a result, we noted the following: • The proper reconciliation of funds disbursed as allowed by the HEERF III program requires reconciliation of the funds drawn and disbursed for each assistant listing portion (1) a reconciliation of funds disbursed to students directly (student aid portion) and funds disbursed for other allowable expenditures to the general ledger, (2) a reconciliation to the disbursement for general operating purposes and loss revenue to the approved and documented methodology and the general ledger accounts and (3) all funds requested via the G-5 reports should be accurately reconciled to the general ledger and to the various detail reports supporting the disbursements. This procedures also extends to the funds received from the Department of Commerce. The reconciliations should be summarized and reported quarterly and annually as required by the CARES Act (See HEERF Reporting web page) and other funding sources. • Financial statement adjustments were needed to properly recognize the cash balance for the Title III program, Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and other programs. The reconciliation process, as outlined in the internal control procedures is not performed in a timely manner. Context: Review of cash management procedures related to the HEERF ,Title III-Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. Criteria: Standards for financial management systems [2 CFR §215.21] and CARES Act 18004 (ARP). Effect: The effect is that unresolved balances could represent excess cash due back to the U.S. Department of Education, or not receipting funds that are due to the University for students who have obtained their education. The failure to not meeting he three components of reporting for HEERF as required by the CARES Act and ARP. Deficiency in reporting as required by the Department of Commerce. Cause: Weaknesses in procedures over reconciliation of grant activity. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that federal program activity is reconciled on a monthly basis for all open award years. This process should be coordinated between all affected departments (i.e., Grants and Contracts, Accounting Department, Sponsored Programs, Student Financial Aid, etc.). The reconciled amounts should properly reflect amounts due to or from the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Commerce on the University’s general ledger accounting system. The reconciliations should be reviewed by a responsible official of the University. Monitoring of such reconciliation and the reporting requirements should be evidenced by internal control procedures and proper documentation of authorization. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the auditor’s finding. The University has engaged a third party to review the reconciliation procedures and to make recommendations on improvements to our current policy. The recommendations will also include any additional documentation that showing proof that the reconciliation has been completed as timely as required. The Vice President of Business & Finance and the Director of Student Financial Aid will review the reconciliations. Monitoring reports will be completed and shared with senior management and relevant department leaders. Implementation date: Immediately and before June 30, 2025. Persons Responsible: Vice President of Business & Finance, controller and Director of Student Financial Aid.
Condition: Good internal controls over the receipt of federal funds require the reconciliation of authorized and recorded disbursements of cash drawn from the federal cash management system. This process ensures that federal funds are properly earned by the University and the University has not made a disbursement for which it has not been funded. During our audit, we noted that the University made efforts to reconcile its program activity under the COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (American Rescue Plan - HEERF-III), Higher Educational Institutional Aid (Title III), Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. However, we did not see evidence that the reconciliation of HEERF funding, Title III program activity, Strengthening Minority -Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program is performed regularly as part of the University’s monthly and annual close-out. As a result, we noted the following: • The proper reconciliation of funds disbursed as allowed by the HEERF III program requires reconciliation of the funds drawn and disbursed for each assistant listing portion (1) a reconciliation of funds disbursed to students directly (student aid portion) and funds disbursed for other allowable expenditures to the general ledger, (2) a reconciliation to the disbursement for general operating purposes and loss revenue to the approved and documented methodology and the general ledger accounts and (3) all funds requested via the G-5 reports should be accurately reconciled to the general ledger and to the various detail reports supporting the disbursements. This procedures also extends to the funds received from the Department of Commerce. The reconciliations should be summarized and reported quarterly and annually as required by the CARES Act (See HEERF Reporting web page) and other funding sources. • Financial statement adjustments were needed to properly recognize the cash balance for the Title III program, Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and other programs. The reconciliation process, as outlined in the internal control procedures is not performed in a timely manner. Context: Review of cash management procedures related to the HEERF ,Title III-Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. Criteria: Standards for financial management systems [2 CFR §215.21] and CARES Act 18004 (ARP). Effect: The effect is that unresolved balances could represent excess cash due back to the U.S. Department of Education, or not receipting funds that are due to the University for students who have obtained their education. The failure to not meeting he three components of reporting for HEERF as required by the CARES Act and ARP. Deficiency in reporting as required by the Department of Commerce. Cause: Weaknesses in procedures over reconciliation of grant activity. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that federal program activity is reconciled on a monthly basis for all open award years. This process should be coordinated between all affected departments (i.e., Grants and Contracts, Accounting Department, Sponsored Programs, Student Financial Aid, etc.). The reconciled amounts should properly reflect amounts due to or from the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Commerce on the University’s general ledger accounting system. The reconciliations should be reviewed by a responsible official of the University. Monitoring of such reconciliation and the reporting requirements should be evidenced by internal control procedures and proper documentation of authorization. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the auditor’s finding. The University has engaged a third party to review the reconciliation procedures and to make recommendations on improvements to our current policy. The recommendations will also include any additional documentation that showing proof that the reconciliation has been completed as timely as required. The Vice President of Business & Finance and the Director of Student Financial Aid will review the reconciliations. Monitoring reports will be completed and shared with senior management and relevant department leaders. Implementation date: Immediately and before June 30, 2025. Persons Responsible: Vice President of Business & Finance, controller and Director of Student Financial Aid.
Condition: Good internal controls over the receipt of federal funds require the reconciliation of authorized and recorded disbursements of cash drawn from the federal cash management system. This process ensures that federal funds are properly earned by the University and the University has not made a disbursement for which it has not been funded. During our audit, we noted that the University made efforts to reconcile its program activity under the COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (American Rescue Plan - HEERF-III), Higher Educational Institutional Aid (Title III), Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. However, we did not see evidence that the reconciliation of HEERF funding, Title III program activity, Strengthening Minority -Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program is performed regularly as part of the University’s monthly and annual close-out. As a result, we noted the following: • The proper reconciliation of funds disbursed as allowed by the HEERF III program requires reconciliation of the funds drawn and disbursed for each assistant listing portion (1) a reconciliation of funds disbursed to students directly (student aid portion) and funds disbursed for other allowable expenditures to the general ledger, (2) a reconciliation to the disbursement for general operating purposes and loss revenue to the approved and documented methodology and the general ledger accounts and (3) all funds requested via the G-5 reports should be accurately reconciled to the general ledger and to the various detail reports supporting the disbursements. This procedures also extends to the funds received from the Department of Commerce. The reconciliations should be summarized and reported quarterly and annually as required by the CARES Act (See HEERF Reporting web page) and other funding sources. • Financial statement adjustments were needed to properly recognize the cash balance for the Title III program, Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and other programs. The reconciliation process, as outlined in the internal control procedures is not performed in a timely manner. Context: Review of cash management procedures related to the HEERF ,Title III-Strengthening Minority-Serving Institutions and the Connecting Minority Communities Program. Criteria: Standards for financial management systems [2 CFR §215.21] and CARES Act 18004 (ARP). Effect: The effect is that unresolved balances could represent excess cash due back to the U.S. Department of Education, or not receipting funds that are due to the University for students who have obtained their education. The failure to not meeting he three components of reporting for HEERF as required by the CARES Act and ARP. Deficiency in reporting as required by the Department of Commerce. Cause: Weaknesses in procedures over reconciliation of grant activity. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that federal program activity is reconciled on a monthly basis for all open award years. This process should be coordinated between all affected departments (i.e., Grants and Contracts, Accounting Department, Sponsored Programs, Student Financial Aid, etc.). The reconciled amounts should properly reflect amounts due to or from the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Commerce on the University’s general ledger accounting system. The reconciliations should be reviewed by a responsible official of the University. Monitoring of such reconciliation and the reporting requirements should be evidenced by internal control procedures and proper documentation of authorization. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the auditor’s finding. The University has engaged a third party to review the reconciliation procedures and to make recommendations on improvements to our current policy. The recommendations will also include any additional documentation that showing proof that the reconciliation has been completed as timely as required. The Vice President of Business & Finance and the Director of Student Financial Aid will review the reconciliations. Monitoring reports will be completed and shared with senior management and relevant department leaders. Implementation date: Immediately and before June 30, 2025. Persons Responsible: Vice President of Business & Finance, controller and Director of Student Financial Aid.