Audit 351778

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$69.57M
Findings
8
Programs
14
Organization: Antioch University (OH)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-31
Auditor: Rsm US LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
547609 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes N
547610 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes N
547611 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes N
547612 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1124051 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1124052 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1124053 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1124054 2024-002 Significant Deficiency Yes N

Contacts

Name Title Type
NGCKFNEEYJL5 Allan Gozum Auditee
9377691304 David Andrews Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Coalition for the Common Good dba Antioch University (the University) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the University.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The University has elected not to exercise its option to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Federal Direct Student Loan Program Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance The University participates in the Federal Direct Student Loan Program, including Federal Subsidized Stafford Loans, Federal Unsubsidized Stafford Loans and Federal Parent Loans for Undergraduate Students. Expenditures include new loans processed for students during the year ended June 30, 2024. The University is responsible only for the performance of certain administrative duties with respect to the Federally Guaranteed Student Loan Programs and, accordingly, balances and transactions relating to the loan programs are not included in the University’s basic financial statements. Therefore, it is not practical to determine the balance of loans outstanding to students and former students of the University at June 30, 2024.

Finding Details

Finding 2024-001 Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 and 84.268 Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: 2024 Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22 requires the University to implement internal control procedures and to appropriately administer funding under the Student Financial Assistance Cluster to return Title IV funds in the appropriate time required by regulations. Condition: During the course of our testing, we identified one student from a sample of nine whose Title IV refunds were not calculated correctly. Additionally, we identified one student from a sample of nine whose return of Title IV aid was not returned in the appropriate time required. Cause: Administrative oversight by personnel in calculating and reporting the status accurately and timely did not operate as designed Context: Controls did not operate properly to refund students with Federal Direct loans or Pell grants. Effect: The University has not complied with certain requirements of FSA Handbook and Federal Code of Regulations to return aid properly to the students. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendations: The University should implement and document an overall quality assurance process including adequate controls to prevent overall noncompliance. Views of responsible individuals: Management concurs with and will implement the recommendation. See corrective action plan on page 39-42.
Finding 2024-002 Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 and 84.268 Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: 2024 Criteria: The University is required to ensure proper controls are present to report enrollment information accurately and on a timely basis as required through specific regulations at 34 CFR 685.309(b). Condition: During the course of our special tests and provisions, we identified 3 students from a sample of 25 where the number of days between the enrollment change and reporting to National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) was not within the required 60 days. We also identified 3 students from our sample of 25 whose withdraw date was reported as the day after the withdraw began and 1 student whose withdraw date was reported as the end of the semester in which the student was attending. We also identified 2 students from our sample of 25 who was reported as withdrawn instead of graduated. Cause: Administrative oversight by personnel in reporting the status accurately and timely did not operate as designed. Context: Controls did operate properly for the University to notify NSLDS accurately and within the required timeframe. Effect: The University has not complied with certain requirements of FSA Handbook and Federal Code of Regulations to report enrollment status changes accurately and timely. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendations: The University should evaluate sufficiency of current procedures to ensure that all status changes are reported in a timely and accurate manner for students who receive federal loans. Views of responsible individuals: Management concurs with and will implement the recommendation. See corrective action plan on page 39-42.
Finding 2024-001 Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 and 84.268 Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: 2024 Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22 requires the University to implement internal control procedures and to appropriately administer funding under the Student Financial Assistance Cluster to return Title IV funds in the appropriate time required by regulations. Condition: During the course of our testing, we identified one student from a sample of nine whose Title IV refunds were not calculated correctly. Additionally, we identified one student from a sample of nine whose return of Title IV aid was not returned in the appropriate time required. Cause: Administrative oversight by personnel in calculating and reporting the status accurately and timely did not operate as designed Context: Controls did not operate properly to refund students with Federal Direct loans or Pell grants. Effect: The University has not complied with certain requirements of FSA Handbook and Federal Code of Regulations to return aid properly to the students. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendations: The University should implement and document an overall quality assurance process including adequate controls to prevent overall noncompliance. Views of responsible individuals: Management concurs with and will implement the recommendation. See corrective action plan on page 39-42.
Finding 2024-002 Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 and 84.268 Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: 2024 Criteria: The University is required to ensure proper controls are present to report enrollment information accurately and on a timely basis as required through specific regulations at 34 CFR 685.309(b). Condition: During the course of our special tests and provisions, we identified 3 students from a sample of 25 where the number of days between the enrollment change and reporting to National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) was not within the required 60 days. We also identified 3 students from our sample of 25 whose withdraw date was reported as the day after the withdraw began and 1 student whose withdraw date was reported as the end of the semester in which the student was attending. We also identified 2 students from our sample of 25 who was reported as withdrawn instead of graduated. Cause: Administrative oversight by personnel in reporting the status accurately and timely did not operate as designed. Context: Controls did operate properly for the University to notify NSLDS accurately and within the required timeframe. Effect: The University has not complied with certain requirements of FSA Handbook and Federal Code of Regulations to report enrollment status changes accurately and timely. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendations: The University should evaluate sufficiency of current procedures to ensure that all status changes are reported in a timely and accurate manner for students who receive federal loans. Views of responsible individuals: Management concurs with and will implement the recommendation. See corrective action plan on page 39-42.
Finding 2024-001 Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 and 84.268 Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: 2024 Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22 requires the University to implement internal control procedures and to appropriately administer funding under the Student Financial Assistance Cluster to return Title IV funds in the appropriate time required by regulations. Condition: During the course of our testing, we identified one student from a sample of nine whose Title IV refunds were not calculated correctly. Additionally, we identified one student from a sample of nine whose return of Title IV aid was not returned in the appropriate time required. Cause: Administrative oversight by personnel in calculating and reporting the status accurately and timely did not operate as designed Context: Controls did not operate properly to refund students with Federal Direct loans or Pell grants. Effect: The University has not complied with certain requirements of FSA Handbook and Federal Code of Regulations to return aid properly to the students. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendations: The University should implement and document an overall quality assurance process including adequate controls to prevent overall noncompliance. Views of responsible individuals: Management concurs with and will implement the recommendation. See corrective action plan on page 39-42.
Finding 2024-002 Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 and 84.268 Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: 2024 Criteria: The University is required to ensure proper controls are present to report enrollment information accurately and on a timely basis as required through specific regulations at 34 CFR 685.309(b). Condition: During the course of our special tests and provisions, we identified 3 students from a sample of 25 where the number of days between the enrollment change and reporting to National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) was not within the required 60 days. We also identified 3 students from our sample of 25 whose withdraw date was reported as the day after the withdraw began and 1 student whose withdraw date was reported as the end of the semester in which the student was attending. We also identified 2 students from our sample of 25 who was reported as withdrawn instead of graduated. Cause: Administrative oversight by personnel in reporting the status accurately and timely did not operate as designed. Context: Controls did operate properly for the University to notify NSLDS accurately and within the required timeframe. Effect: The University has not complied with certain requirements of FSA Handbook and Federal Code of Regulations to report enrollment status changes accurately and timely. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendations: The University should evaluate sufficiency of current procedures to ensure that all status changes are reported in a timely and accurate manner for students who receive federal loans. Views of responsible individuals: Management concurs with and will implement the recommendation. See corrective action plan on page 39-42.
Finding 2024-001 Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 and 84.268 Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: 2024 Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22 requires the University to implement internal control procedures and to appropriately administer funding under the Student Financial Assistance Cluster to return Title IV funds in the appropriate time required by regulations. Condition: During the course of our testing, we identified one student from a sample of nine whose Title IV refunds were not calculated correctly. Additionally, we identified one student from a sample of nine whose return of Title IV aid was not returned in the appropriate time required. Cause: Administrative oversight by personnel in calculating and reporting the status accurately and timely did not operate as designed Context: Controls did not operate properly to refund students with Federal Direct loans or Pell grants. Effect: The University has not complied with certain requirements of FSA Handbook and Federal Code of Regulations to return aid properly to the students. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendations: The University should implement and document an overall quality assurance process including adequate controls to prevent overall noncompliance. Views of responsible individuals: Management concurs with and will implement the recommendation. See corrective action plan on page 39-42.
Finding 2024-002 Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 and 84.268 Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: 2024 Criteria: The University is required to ensure proper controls are present to report enrollment information accurately and on a timely basis as required through specific regulations at 34 CFR 685.309(b). Condition: During the course of our special tests and provisions, we identified 3 students from a sample of 25 where the number of days between the enrollment change and reporting to National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) was not within the required 60 days. We also identified 3 students from our sample of 25 whose withdraw date was reported as the day after the withdraw began and 1 student whose withdraw date was reported as the end of the semester in which the student was attending. We also identified 2 students from our sample of 25 who was reported as withdrawn instead of graduated. Cause: Administrative oversight by personnel in reporting the status accurately and timely did not operate as designed. Context: Controls did operate properly for the University to notify NSLDS accurately and within the required timeframe. Effect: The University has not complied with certain requirements of FSA Handbook and Federal Code of Regulations to report enrollment status changes accurately and timely. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendations: The University should evaluate sufficiency of current procedures to ensure that all status changes are reported in a timely and accurate manner for students who receive federal loans. Views of responsible individuals: Management concurs with and will implement the recommendation. See corrective action plan on page 39-42.