Audit 351646

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$161.06M
Findings
0
Programs
34
Organization: City of Anaheim (CA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-31
Auditor: Kpmg LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

No findings recorded

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $6.14M Yes 0
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $5.46M Yes 0
21.023 Emergency Rental Assistance Program $3.87M Yes 0
14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids $1.28M Yes 0
97.083 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (safer) $1.08M - 0
15.916 Outdoor Recreation Acquisition, Development and Planning $736,095 - 0
93.568 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance $629,698 - 0
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $607,330 - 0
17.258 Wioa Adult Program $594,865 - 0
17.259 Wioa Youth Activities $569,908 - 0
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $569,225 - 0
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $547,238 - 0
21.016 Equitable Sharing $368,749 - 0
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $302,168 - 0
17.278 Wioa Dislocated Worker Formula Grants $196,957 - 0
16.710 Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants $158,291 - 0
20.608 Minimum Penalties for Repeat Offenders for Driving While Intoxicated $153,117 - 0
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $144,274 - 0
97.067 Homeland Security Grant Program $144,274 - 0
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $105,732 - 0
17.274 Youthbuild $72,421 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $71,394 Yes 0
16.320 Services for Trafficking Victims $70,005 - 0
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $58,156 - 0
93.499 Low Income Household Water Assistance Program $42,811 - 0
20.616 National Priority Safety Programs $37,421 - 0
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $26,640 - 0
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $17,773 - 0
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $6,420 - 0
45.310 Grants to States $5,952 - 0
20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grants $4,675 - 0
20.319 High-Speed Rail Corridors and Intercity Passenger Rail Service – Capital Assistance Grants $1,624 - 0
14.896 Family Self-Sufficiency Program $946 - 0
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $119 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
J34GBL8PSNU5 Deborah Moreno Auditee
7147655195 Shana Block Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: (1)   General Accounting Policies: The auditee's SEFA is presented using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues from federal award programs are reported in the financial statements as operating and capital grant revenues in the government wide financial statements and intergovernmental revenues in the fund statements. The auditee includes federal awards received directly from federal agencies as well as federal awards passed through the State of California and other agencies on their SEFA. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as discussed in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.414. For the sponsored programs where the City claims indirect costs, the City’s internal indirect cost rate is used. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all federal award programs of the City of Anaheim, California (the City). The Schedule includes federal awards received directly from federal agencies as well as federal awards passed through the State of California and other agencies. The City’s reporting entity is defined in note 1 to the City’s financial statements.
Title: (2)   Basis of Accounting Accounting Policies: The auditee's SEFA is presented using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues from federal award programs are reported in the financial statements as operating and capital grant revenues in the government wide financial statements and intergovernmental revenues in the fund statements. The auditee includes federal awards received directly from federal agencies as well as federal awards passed through the State of California and other agencies on their SEFA. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as discussed in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.414. For the sponsored programs where the City claims indirect costs, the City’s internal indirect cost rate is used. The Schedule is presented using the accrual basis of accounting.
Title: (3)   Relationship to Financial Statements and Federal Financial Reports Accounting Policies: The auditee's SEFA is presented using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues from federal award programs are reported in the financial statements as operating and capital grant revenues in the government wide financial statements and intergovernmental revenues in the fund statements. The auditee includes federal awards received directly from federal agencies as well as federal awards passed through the State of California and other agencies on their SEFA. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as discussed in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.414. For the sponsored programs where the City claims indirect costs, the City’s internal indirect cost rate is used. Information reported in the Schedule agrees with the amounts reported in both the financial statements and related federal financial reports for the major federal programs. Revenues from federal award programs are reported in the financial statements as operating and capital grant revenues in the government-wide financial statements and intergovernmental revenues in the fund statements.
Title: (4)   Community‑Based Loan Programs Accounting Policies: The auditee's SEFA is presented using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues from federal award programs are reported in the financial statements as operating and capital grant revenues in the government wide financial statements and intergovernmental revenues in the fund statements. The auditee includes federal awards received directly from federal agencies as well as federal awards passed through the State of California and other agencies on their SEFA. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as discussed in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.414. For the sponsored programs where the City claims indirect costs, the City’s internal indirect cost rate is used. The City has loans outstanding under the Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) – Entitlement Grants Cluster, Home Investment Partnerships Program, and the Community Development Block Grant/Entitlement Grant – Neighborhood Stabilization Program that contain continuing compliance requirements. The schedule below details the amounts outstanding at June 30, 2024. The amounts included in the accompanying Schedule consist of loans advanced to eligible participants of the programs and other administrative costs for the year ended June 30, 2024. Program income of $703,347 was generated primarily from various loan programs, reported to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and used for eligible activities. Program income is used subject to the requirements established by HUD for each grant and when expended is included in the Schedule.
Title: (5)   Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: The auditee's SEFA is presented using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues from federal award programs are reported in the financial statements as operating and capital grant revenues in the government wide financial statements and intergovernmental revenues in the fund statements. The auditee includes federal awards received directly from federal agencies as well as federal awards passed through the State of California and other agencies on their SEFA. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as discussed in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.414. For the sponsored programs where the City claims indirect costs, the City’s internal indirect cost rate is used. The City did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as discussed in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.414. For the sponsored programs where the City claims indirect costs, the City’s internal indirect cost rate is used.