Audit 351564

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$28.82M
Findings
2
Programs
15
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-31

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
547232 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1123674 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
JDVXRJ31HSH1 Cleta Harless Auditee
3043574738 Valerie Ellis Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1. Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The University of Charleston has elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. The preceding schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of The University of Charleston, Inc., under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a select portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the University.
Title: Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The University of Charleston has elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Note 3. Federal Direct Loan Program Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The University of Charleston has elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. The University is responsible only for the performance of certain administrative duties with respect to its Federal Direct Loan programs and, accordingly, these loans are not included in its financial statements. It is not practicable to determine the balance of loans outstanding to students and former students of the University under these programs as of June 30, 2024.
Title: Note 4. Federal Student Loan Programs Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The University of Charleston has elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. The federal student loan programs listed below are administered directly by the University, and balances and transactions relating to these programs are included in the University's basic financial statements. Loans outstanding at the beginning of the year and loans made during the year are included in the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule. Total new loans disbursed under the Federal Perkins Loan and the Nursing Student Loan Program were $0. The balances of loans outstanding at June 30, 2024 were:
Title: Note 5. Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The University of Charleston has elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. The University of Charleston has elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Condition: The University did not report student enrollment data to the National Student Clearinghouse within the minimum required timeframe. Criteria: Based on requirements set forth by 34 CFR Section 685.309(b)(2), the University is responsible for notifying the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) to changes to student’s enrollment data within minimum required timeframes. Cause: We noted that the University experienced significant turnover in the Institutional Researcher position, which was responsible for reporting enrollment data, leading to enrollment data not being reported timely. Context: From a population of 47 students that withdrew officially during a term, we tested 11 students and noted that 6 of those students’ withdrawals were not timely reported. In addition, batch enrollment reporting was not completed timely during four months of the year. Effect: Enrollment data was not reported timely or accurately to the Department of Education thus, the Department could not properly service the student’s loans. The accuracy of Title IV student loan records depends heavily on the accuracy of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Recommendation: We recommend that a review process be put in place to ensure timely and accurate enrollment reporting to NSLDS. Corrective Action: The University recognizes the untimely staff turnover and the impact it has had on University compliance. University leadership has taken steps to ensure immediate and future compliance with the regulations referenced in this finding. The following corrective action plan has been implemented to prevent delays in future reporting. An experienced Institutional Researcher (IR) has been hired for the University, with over 20 years of student enrollment data management and reporting to the National Student Clearinghouse (Clearinghouse). The schedule for reporting student enrollment has been modified to reflect reporting within 30-to-45-day intervals. Reporting at this interval will ensure compliance with the 60-day requirement. Email notifications of enrollment reports due, enrollment reports submitted, correction reports, and report delinquencies from the Clearinghouse are now sent to the IR, the Registrar, and the Provost’s Office. The Provost and the IR meet at least weekly regarding compliance and ongoing reporting for the University.
Condition: The University did not report student enrollment data to the National Student Clearinghouse within the minimum required timeframe. Criteria: Based on requirements set forth by 34 CFR Section 685.309(b)(2), the University is responsible for notifying the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) to changes to student’s enrollment data within minimum required timeframes. Cause: We noted that the University experienced significant turnover in the Institutional Researcher position, which was responsible for reporting enrollment data, leading to enrollment data not being reported timely. Context: From a population of 47 students that withdrew officially during a term, we tested 11 students and noted that 6 of those students’ withdrawals were not timely reported. In addition, batch enrollment reporting was not completed timely during four months of the year. Effect: Enrollment data was not reported timely or accurately to the Department of Education thus, the Department could not properly service the student’s loans. The accuracy of Title IV student loan records depends heavily on the accuracy of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Recommendation: We recommend that a review process be put in place to ensure timely and accurate enrollment reporting to NSLDS. Corrective Action: The University recognizes the untimely staff turnover and the impact it has had on University compliance. University leadership has taken steps to ensure immediate and future compliance with the regulations referenced in this finding. The following corrective action plan has been implemented to prevent delays in future reporting. An experienced Institutional Researcher (IR) has been hired for the University, with over 20 years of student enrollment data management and reporting to the National Student Clearinghouse (Clearinghouse). The schedule for reporting student enrollment has been modified to reflect reporting within 30-to-45-day intervals. Reporting at this interval will ensure compliance with the 60-day requirement. Email notifications of enrollment reports due, enrollment reports submitted, correction reports, and report delinquencies from the Clearinghouse are now sent to the IR, the Registrar, and the Provost’s Office. The Provost and the IR meet at least weekly regarding compliance and ongoing reporting for the University.