Audit 351347

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$3.71M
Findings
4
Programs
26
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-31

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
546963 2024-003 Material Weakness - N
546964 2024-003 Material Weakness - N
1123405 2024-003 Material Weakness - N
1123406 2024-003 Material Weakness - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.555 National School Lunch Program 2023 $667,238 Yes 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program 2024 $490,695 Yes 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund 2023 $307,733 - 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 2023 $285,350 Yes 1
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 2024 $268,299 Yes 1
93.575 Child Care and Development Block Grant 2023 $236,245 - 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program 2024 $91,427 Yes 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program 2023 $91,354 Yes 0
84.013 Title I State Agency Program for Neglected and Delinquent Children and Youth 2024 $79,757 - 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program 2024 $78,615 - 0
84.027 Special Education Grants to States 2024 $69,705 - 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program 2023 $58,446 - 0
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) 2024 $51,865 - 0
84.013 Title I State Agency Program for Neglected and Delinquent Children and Youth 2023 $40,790 - 0
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States 2023 $26,741 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program 2023 $24,045 - 0
93.575 Child Care and Development Block Grant 2024 $20,426 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund 2024 $7,960 - 0
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants 2024 $5,281 - 0
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants 2024 $4,408 - 0
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) 2023 $3,511 - 0
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants 2023 $3,228 - 0
84.027 Special Education Grants to States 2023 $3,137 - 0
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States 2024 $2,520 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program 2024 $527 - 0
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants 2023 $156 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
FP51K5NHPSV6 Lynn Leininger Auditee
2603273677 Beth Kelley, Cpa, Cfe Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies A. Basis of Presentation The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) includes the federal award activity of the School Corporation under programs of the federal government for the years ended June 30, 2023 and 2024. The information in the SEFA is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the SEFA presents only a select portion of the operations of the School Corporation, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position of the School Corporation. The Uniform Guidance requires an annual audit of nonfederal entities expending a total amount of federal awards equal to or in excess of $750,000 in any fiscal year unless by constitution or statute a less frequent audit is required. In accordance with Indiana Code (IC 5-11-1-25), audits of school corporations shall be conducted biennially. Such audits shall include both years within the biennial period. B. Other Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 2. Indirect Cost Rate The School Corporation has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-001-P01, 23611-001-P01, 24611-001-P01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context State Educational Agencies (SEA), in consultation with Local Educational Agencies (LEA), are required to establish and maintain an assessment security system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies and procedures to maintain test security measures and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and procedures. As such, the Indiana Department of Education created and published the Indiana Assessments Policy Manual. As a part of the assessment security, any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or School Corporation, shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity statement that remains on file in the appropriate building-level office each year. Each individual required to sign the testing integrity agreement, shall sign the form by an established date. Due to the lack of Internal controls over supporting documentation, 32 of the 40 employees selected for testing did not have the testing security and integrity statement retained for audit purposes. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 WHITKO COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that an employee who is no longer employed by the School Corporation was responsible for storing the Indiana Testing Security and Integrity Agreements. The School Corporation was unable to locate the prior employee's files. The School Corporation was able to obtain the Agreements for one building for both years and one building for the second year of the audit period. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Someone administrating testing, that has not signed the security and integrity agreement, could possibly not follow security properly and the testing integrity could be compromised. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required employees complete assessment security training and sign the appropriate forms and retain those forms for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-001-P01, 23611-001-P01, 24611-001-P01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context State Educational Agencies (SEA), in consultation with Local Educational Agencies (LEA), are required to establish and maintain an assessment security system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies and procedures to maintain test security measures and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and procedures. As such, the Indiana Department of Education created and published the Indiana Assessments Policy Manual. As a part of the assessment security, any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or School Corporation, shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity statement that remains on file in the appropriate building-level office each year. Each individual required to sign the testing integrity agreement, shall sign the form by an established date. Due to the lack of Internal controls over supporting documentation, 32 of the 40 employees selected for testing did not have the testing security and integrity statement retained for audit purposes. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 WHITKO COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that an employee who is no longer employed by the School Corporation was responsible for storing the Indiana Testing Security and Integrity Agreements. The School Corporation was unable to locate the prior employee's files. The School Corporation was able to obtain the Agreements for one building for both years and one building for the second year of the audit period. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Someone administrating testing, that has not signed the security and integrity agreement, could possibly not follow security properly and the testing integrity could be compromised. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required employees complete assessment security training and sign the appropriate forms and retain those forms for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-001-P01, 23611-001-P01, 24611-001-P01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context State Educational Agencies (SEA), in consultation with Local Educational Agencies (LEA), are required to establish and maintain an assessment security system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies and procedures to maintain test security measures and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and procedures. As such, the Indiana Department of Education created and published the Indiana Assessments Policy Manual. As a part of the assessment security, any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or School Corporation, shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity statement that remains on file in the appropriate building-level office each year. Each individual required to sign the testing integrity agreement, shall sign the form by an established date. Due to the lack of Internal controls over supporting documentation, 32 of the 40 employees selected for testing did not have the testing security and integrity statement retained for audit purposes. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 WHITKO COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that an employee who is no longer employed by the School Corporation was responsible for storing the Indiana Testing Security and Integrity Agreements. The School Corporation was unable to locate the prior employee's files. The School Corporation was able to obtain the Agreements for one building for both years and one building for the second year of the audit period. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Someone administrating testing, that has not signed the security and integrity agreement, could possibly not follow security properly and the testing integrity could be compromised. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required employees complete assessment security training and sign the appropriate forms and retain those forms for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-001-P01, 23611-001-P01, 24611-001-P01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context State Educational Agencies (SEA), in consultation with Local Educational Agencies (LEA), are required to establish and maintain an assessment security system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies and procedures to maintain test security measures and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and procedures. As such, the Indiana Department of Education created and published the Indiana Assessments Policy Manual. As a part of the assessment security, any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or School Corporation, shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity statement that remains on file in the appropriate building-level office each year. Each individual required to sign the testing integrity agreement, shall sign the form by an established date. Due to the lack of Internal controls over supporting documentation, 32 of the 40 employees selected for testing did not have the testing security and integrity statement retained for audit purposes. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 WHITKO COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that an employee who is no longer employed by the School Corporation was responsible for storing the Indiana Testing Security and Integrity Agreements. The School Corporation was unable to locate the prior employee's files. The School Corporation was able to obtain the Agreements for one building for both years and one building for the second year of the audit period. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Someone administrating testing, that has not signed the security and integrity agreement, could possibly not follow security properly and the testing integrity could be compromised. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required employees complete assessment security training and sign the appropriate forms and retain those forms for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.