Audit 350999

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$786,089
Findings
4
Programs
4
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-31

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
544358 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
544359 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - L
1120800 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
1120801 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - L

Programs

Contacts

Name Title Type
FKWRJBBWN9L5 Natasha Espana Auditee
5052469240 Alex Gurule Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Reconciliation of Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards to the Financial Statements Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents the activity of all federal programs of the Coalition reporting entity as described in Note 1 to the financial statements. All federal awards received from federal agencies are included on the schedule. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented using the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 2 to the Coalition’s financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Coalition has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The following is a reconciliation of the expenditures reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards to the expenditures reported in the financial statements:

Finding Details

Criteria: To be allowable under federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance and administration of the federal award. Costs must meet the following criteria: 1) necessary and reasonable; 2) consistent with policies and procedures; 3) accorded consistent treatment; and 4) are adequately documented. Condition: Expenditures were not consistent with the above criteria. We noted the following: 1) One out twenty-seven transactions tested where an employee’s pay rate was not approved and three out of twenty-seven transactions tested where there was no timesheet approval. 2) One out of twenty-seven transactions tested where management could not provide original supporting documentation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Four out of twenty-seven transactions tested were not in compliance with federal requirements. Cause and Effect: Internal control procedures are not in place to ensure all transactions are properly approved and supporting documentation is being maintained. Auditors’ Recommendations: Established policies and procedures should be enforced to ensure compliance with federal requirements and the Organizations policies and procedures. All transactions should be appropriately approved and adequately supported by accurate source documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements. Management’s Response: Management acknowledges the audit finding and has evaluated current procedures and have confirmed controls are in place to ensure compliance, accuracy, and accountability in both areas. To prevent unauthorized changes, to strengthen time management controls and ensure proper oversight, management will ensure controls related to the approval process are enforced
Criteria: The Coalition is required to complete annual financial reports within 90 days of the reporting period. Condition: The annual financial reports were not submitted until 95 days after the due date. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Three of three annual financial reports were submitted late. Cause and Effect: Internal controls are not in place to ensure that the required annual financial reports are submitted timely. Auditors’ Recommendations: Implement a process that ensures all reports are submitted timely to the appropriate granting agency. Management’s Response: Management acknowledges the audit finding and has implemented a structured procedure to enhance compliance with funding timelines and reporting deadlines. As part of this process, all relevant reports and due dates are identified, documented, and added to the appropriate team members calendars and maintained throughout the fiscal year. Management is committed to ongoing monitoring and continuous improvement of this process to maintain transparency and regulatory compliance.
Criteria: To be allowable under federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance and administration of the federal award. Costs must meet the following criteria: 1) necessary and reasonable; 2) consistent with policies and procedures; 3) accorded consistent treatment; and 4) are adequately documented. Condition: Expenditures were not consistent with the above criteria. We noted the following: 1) One out twenty-seven transactions tested where an employee’s pay rate was not approved and three out of twenty-seven transactions tested where there was no timesheet approval. 2) One out of twenty-seven transactions tested where management could not provide original supporting documentation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Four out of twenty-seven transactions tested were not in compliance with federal requirements. Cause and Effect: Internal control procedures are not in place to ensure all transactions are properly approved and supporting documentation is being maintained. Auditors’ Recommendations: Established policies and procedures should be enforced to ensure compliance with federal requirements and the Organizations policies and procedures. All transactions should be appropriately approved and adequately supported by accurate source documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements. Management’s Response: Management acknowledges the audit finding and has evaluated current procedures and have confirmed controls are in place to ensure compliance, accuracy, and accountability in both areas. To prevent unauthorized changes, to strengthen time management controls and ensure proper oversight, management will ensure controls related to the approval process are enforced
Criteria: The Coalition is required to complete annual financial reports within 90 days of the reporting period. Condition: The annual financial reports were not submitted until 95 days after the due date. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Three of three annual financial reports were submitted late. Cause and Effect: Internal controls are not in place to ensure that the required annual financial reports are submitted timely. Auditors’ Recommendations: Implement a process that ensures all reports are submitted timely to the appropriate granting agency. Management’s Response: Management acknowledges the audit finding and has implemented a structured procedure to enhance compliance with funding timelines and reporting deadlines. As part of this process, all relevant reports and due dates are identified, documented, and added to the appropriate team members calendars and maintained throughout the fiscal year. Management is committed to ongoing monitoring and continuous improvement of this process to maintain transparency and regulatory compliance.