Audit 350805

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.27M
Findings
4
Programs
1
Organization: University City District (PA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-31
Auditor: Cbiz CPAS PC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
541995 2024-003 Material Weakness - I
541996 2024-004 Material Weakness - L
1118437 2024-003 Material Weakness - I
1118438 2024-004 Material Weakness - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
17.289 Community Project Funding/congressionally Directed Spending $1.27M Yes 2

Contacts

Name Title Type
EM61AYJK5L51 Matt Bergheiser Auditee
2152430555 Marie Decicco Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Entity has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of University City District (the “Entity”) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Entity, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Entity.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Entity has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Entity has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. The Entity has elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Agency: Employment and Training Administration Office of Grants Management ALN: 17.289 Federal Award Identification Number: 23A60C9000032-01-00 Criteria: According to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 200.213, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred. The non-federal entity must verify that the contractor or subrecipient is not suspended or debarred through the System for Award Management (SAM), which includes reviewing the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), or by collecting a certification from the entity. In addition, the Entity must conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. Condition and Context: The Entity failed to perform the required search for suspension and debarment in SAM for the two contractors tested and did not conduct a full and open competition for the services provided prior to awarding a contract under the federal program. The search should have been performed to ensure that the contractor was not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Entity has a procurement policy. However, the Entity did not follow that policy related to these two contractors. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Entity implement and adhere to a strict protocol for verifying suspension and debarment status and conduct an open and competitive bidding process prior to awarding any contracts or subawards under federal programs. We also recommend that suspension and debarment be included in the Entity’s procurement policy. In addition, the Entity should maintain documentation of the results of the searches, and the competitive bidding process and results to be in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See attached corrective action plan. Questioned Costs: None
Agency: Employment and Training Administration Office of Grants Management ALN: 17.289 Federal Award Identification Number: 23A60C9000032-01-00   Criteria: Under the Committee of Sponsoring Organization framework, control activities are established through policies and procedures that help ensure that management’s directives to mitigate risks to the achievement of objectives are carried out. Segregation of duties is typically built into the selection and development of control activities. According to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 200.327 and 200.328, recipients of federal awards are required to submit performance and financial reports by the due dates specified in the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Context and Condition: There was an overall lack of segregation of duties surrounding the preparation and submission of grant reimbursement requests as the VP of Finance performed this function himself with no review and approval. Cause: The Entity failed to establish a set of internal control procedures to ensure segregation of duties and an appropriate review and approval process. Effect: There was a lack of adequate review and oversight over grant reporting. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Entity establish internal control procedures that incorporate segregation of duties and add a level of review and approval for grant reporting. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See attached corrective action plan. Questioned Costs: None
Agency: Employment and Training Administration Office of Grants Management ALN: 17.289 Federal Award Identification Number: 23A60C9000032-01-00 Criteria: According to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 200.213, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred. The non-federal entity must verify that the contractor or subrecipient is not suspended or debarred through the System for Award Management (SAM), which includes reviewing the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), or by collecting a certification from the entity. In addition, the Entity must conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. Condition and Context: The Entity failed to perform the required search for suspension and debarment in SAM for the two contractors tested and did not conduct a full and open competition for the services provided prior to awarding a contract under the federal program. The search should have been performed to ensure that the contractor was not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Entity has a procurement policy. However, the Entity did not follow that policy related to these two contractors. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Entity implement and adhere to a strict protocol for verifying suspension and debarment status and conduct an open and competitive bidding process prior to awarding any contracts or subawards under federal programs. We also recommend that suspension and debarment be included in the Entity’s procurement policy. In addition, the Entity should maintain documentation of the results of the searches, and the competitive bidding process and results to be in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See attached corrective action plan. Questioned Costs: None
Agency: Employment and Training Administration Office of Grants Management ALN: 17.289 Federal Award Identification Number: 23A60C9000032-01-00   Criteria: Under the Committee of Sponsoring Organization framework, control activities are established through policies and procedures that help ensure that management’s directives to mitigate risks to the achievement of objectives are carried out. Segregation of duties is typically built into the selection and development of control activities. According to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 200.327 and 200.328, recipients of federal awards are required to submit performance and financial reports by the due dates specified in the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Context and Condition: There was an overall lack of segregation of duties surrounding the preparation and submission of grant reimbursement requests as the VP of Finance performed this function himself with no review and approval. Cause: The Entity failed to establish a set of internal control procedures to ensure segregation of duties and an appropriate review and approval process. Effect: There was a lack of adequate review and oversight over grant reporting. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Entity establish internal control procedures that incorporate segregation of duties and add a level of review and approval for grant reporting. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See attached corrective action plan. Questioned Costs: None