Audit 350674

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.78M
Findings
4
Programs
6
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-31

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
541071 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
541072 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
1117513 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
1117514 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
T2NTNECUHS86 Linda Raines Auditee
4439011550 Max Manley Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1. Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Association has elected not to use the de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of the Association under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Association; accordingly, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Association.
Title: Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Association has elected not to use the de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Association has elected not to use the de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding 2024-001: Time Tracking and Reporting (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: 93.958 - Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to 2 CFR Section 200.430(i) charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: 1. Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; 2. Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; 3. Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities; 4. Encompass Federally-assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non- Federal entity’s written policy; 5. Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity; 6. Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non- Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. 7. Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards.” Condition: During our testwork, we determined that the Association did not adequately document employee time spent on the Federal programs versus other programs. Cause: The Association does not require that all employees complete timesheets documenting time spent on the Federal award versus other awards. Effect or Potential Effect: The Association could inadvertently charge time to the Federal award that was not truly spent working on the Federal award. This could result in the Federal government over-paying for salaries associated with the award. Questioned Costs: Undetermined. The allocations of time were ultimately determined based on Management's evaluation of employee level of effort during the year. While the allocation was approved by management, there was degree of subjectivity applied in management's evaluation. Context: We noted that employees selected for testing did not have completed, detailed timesheets to indicate time spent on the Federal awards and other programs. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal time tracking policies to require all employees to complete a detailed timesheet in order to track actual time spent on various programs. All timesheets should have evidence of both employee and supervisory approval.
Finding 2024-001: Time Tracking and Reporting (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: 93.958 - Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to 2 CFR Section 200.430(i) charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: 1. Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; 2. Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; 3. Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities; 4. Encompass Federally-assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non- Federal entity’s written policy; 5. Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity; 6. Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non- Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. 7. Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards.” Condition: During our testwork, we determined that the Association did not adequately document employee time spent on the Federal programs versus other programs. Cause: The Association does not require that all employees complete timesheets documenting time spent on the Federal award versus other awards. Effect or Potential Effect: The Association could inadvertently charge time to the Federal award that was not truly spent working on the Federal award. This could result in the Federal government over-paying for salaries associated with the award. Questioned Costs: Undetermined. The allocations of time were ultimately determined based on Management's evaluation of employee level of effort during the year. While the allocation was approved by management, there was degree of subjectivity applied in management's evaluation. Context: We noted that employees selected for testing did not have completed, detailed timesheets to indicate time spent on the Federal awards and other programs. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal time tracking policies to require all employees to complete a detailed timesheet in order to track actual time spent on various programs. All timesheets should have evidence of both employee and supervisory approval.
Finding 2024-001: Time Tracking and Reporting (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: 93.958 - Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to 2 CFR Section 200.430(i) charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: 1. Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; 2. Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; 3. Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities; 4. Encompass Federally-assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non- Federal entity’s written policy; 5. Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity; 6. Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non- Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. 7. Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards.” Condition: During our testwork, we determined that the Association did not adequately document employee time spent on the Federal programs versus other programs. Cause: The Association does not require that all employees complete timesheets documenting time spent on the Federal award versus other awards. Effect or Potential Effect: The Association could inadvertently charge time to the Federal award that was not truly spent working on the Federal award. This could result in the Federal government over-paying for salaries associated with the award. Questioned Costs: Undetermined. The allocations of time were ultimately determined based on Management's evaluation of employee level of effort during the year. While the allocation was approved by management, there was degree of subjectivity applied in management's evaluation. Context: We noted that employees selected for testing did not have completed, detailed timesheets to indicate time spent on the Federal awards and other programs. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal time tracking policies to require all employees to complete a detailed timesheet in order to track actual time spent on various programs. All timesheets should have evidence of both employee and supervisory approval.
Finding 2024-001: Time Tracking and Reporting (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: 93.958 - Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to 2 CFR Section 200.430(i) charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: 1. Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; 2. Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; 3. Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities; 4. Encompass Federally-assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non- Federal entity’s written policy; 5. Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity; 6. Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non- Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. 7. Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards.” Condition: During our testwork, we determined that the Association did not adequately document employee time spent on the Federal programs versus other programs. Cause: The Association does not require that all employees complete timesheets documenting time spent on the Federal award versus other awards. Effect or Potential Effect: The Association could inadvertently charge time to the Federal award that was not truly spent working on the Federal award. This could result in the Federal government over-paying for salaries associated with the award. Questioned Costs: Undetermined. The allocations of time were ultimately determined based on Management's evaluation of employee level of effort during the year. While the allocation was approved by management, there was degree of subjectivity applied in management's evaluation. Context: We noted that employees selected for testing did not have completed, detailed timesheets to indicate time spent on the Federal awards and other programs. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Association implement formal time tracking policies to require all employees to complete a detailed timesheet in order to track actual time spent on various programs. All timesheets should have evidence of both employee and supervisory approval.