Audit 350408

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$33.96M
Findings
2
Programs
23
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
540715 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - N
1117157 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.029 Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund $9.70M Yes 0
93.600 Head Start $3.09M - 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $2.94M Yes 1
84.027 Special Education Grants to States $2.58M - 0
84.371 Comprehensive Literacy Development $750,616 - 0
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) $652,413 - 0
84.287 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers $587,057 - 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program $531,014 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $387,062 - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $283,197 - 0
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States $238,206 - 0
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $130,290 - 0
84.002 Adult Education - Basic Grants to States $105,784 - 0
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants $99,259 - 0
84.060 Indian Education Grants to Local Educational Agencies $84,866 - 0
93.276 Drug-Free Communities Support Program Grants $77,396 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $36,083 - 0
10.559 Summer Food Service Program for Children $29,952 - 0
93.566 Refugee and Entrant Assistance State/replacement Designee Administered Programs $24,157 - 0
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants $22,665 - 0
16.888 Consolidated and Technical Assistance Grant Program to Address Children and Youth Experiencing Domestic and Sexual Violence and Engage Men and Boys As Allies $8,881 - 0
10.574 Team Nutrition Grants $2,953 - 0
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $210 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
LU4KLJXKEBP8 Brandon Baumbach Auditee
7017462205 Brian Opsahl Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the applicable cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Grand Forks Public School District No. 1 has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying Schedule includes the federal award activity of the Grand Forks Public School District No. 1 under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Grand Forks Public School District No. 1, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or change in net position of Grand Forks Public School District No. 1. The amounts reported on the schedule have been reconciled to and are in agreement with amounts recorded in the accounting records from which the financial statements have been reported.
Title: NON-MONETARY TRANSACTIONS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the applicable cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Grand Forks Public School District No. 1 has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The District receives commodities through the food distribution program and the assistance is valued at the fair value of the commodities received and disbursed. During the year, the District received $283,517 for commodities and used $283,517 in commodities.
Title: PASS-THROUGH ENTITIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the applicable cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Grand Forks Public School District No. 1 has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. All pass-through entities listed above use the same AL numbers as the federal grantors to identify these grants, and have not assigned any additional identifying numbers.

Finding Details

2024-003 - Special Tests and Provisions – Participation of Private School Children Assistance Listing Number 84.010 Title 1 Department of Education Passed Through North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Criteria For programs funded under Title I, Part A (Assistance Listing 84.010), a local educational agency, after timely and meaningful consultation with private school officials, must provide equitable services to eligible private school children, their teachers, and their families. Eligible private school children are those who reside in a participating public school attendance area and have educational needs under Section 1115(c) of the ESEA (20 USC 6315(c)). The amount of funds a local educational agency makes available for equitable services under Title I, Part A must be equal to the proportion of funds generated by private school children from low-income families who reside in participating public school attendance areas. A local educational agency must determine the proportional share available for services for eligible private school children based on the total amount of Title I funds received prior to any expenditures or transfers of funds within the program, such as reservations for administration, parental involvement, and district-wide activities (20 USC 6320(a)(4)(A)). Local education agencies determine the proportional share by multiplying the proportion of children from low-income families who attend private schools and live in participating Title I attendance areas by the local educational agency’s total Title I allocation (including any funds transferred into Title I). Condition The documentation the District provided supporting numbers of private school children attending used in the allocation of funds provided to private schools did not agree to the allocation calculation. Context Two participating private schools are within the District’s service area. The supporting documentation for students attending both of these participating private schools did not agree to the allocation calculations. Cause The District did not maintain proper supporting documentation to support the number of students from participating private schools. Effect Allocation of Title I funding provided to local private schools may not be correct. Questioned Costs None Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the District retain all supporting documentation in accordance with their record retention policies and ensure the supporting documentation and the information used in the allocation calculations agree. Management’s Response The discrepancy stemmed from the timing of data collection for the nonpublic schools. Worksheet G was initially completed using estimated numbers during a different month (October) than when final numbers were collected, resulting in a mismatch with the Final Rank & Serve data. Although the final numbers used were those approved by DPI, we do not have a corresponding Worksheet G to verify those figures from that specific month. Moving forward, we will collect Worksheet G forms monthly from our nonpublic schools -mirroring the process used for public schools through our child nutrition system. This will ensure consistent documentation and verification of data, and prevent future discrepancies. Additionally, we recognize that the nonpublic schools' systems are unable to retrieve historical free/reduced lunch data month by month, which reinforces the need for this proactive monthly collection.
2024-003 - Special Tests and Provisions – Participation of Private School Children Assistance Listing Number 84.010 Title 1 Department of Education Passed Through North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Criteria For programs funded under Title I, Part A (Assistance Listing 84.010), a local educational agency, after timely and meaningful consultation with private school officials, must provide equitable services to eligible private school children, their teachers, and their families. Eligible private school children are those who reside in a participating public school attendance area and have educational needs under Section 1115(c) of the ESEA (20 USC 6315(c)). The amount of funds a local educational agency makes available for equitable services under Title I, Part A must be equal to the proportion of funds generated by private school children from low-income families who reside in participating public school attendance areas. A local educational agency must determine the proportional share available for services for eligible private school children based on the total amount of Title I funds received prior to any expenditures or transfers of funds within the program, such as reservations for administration, parental involvement, and district-wide activities (20 USC 6320(a)(4)(A)). Local education agencies determine the proportional share by multiplying the proportion of children from low-income families who attend private schools and live in participating Title I attendance areas by the local educational agency’s total Title I allocation (including any funds transferred into Title I). Condition The documentation the District provided supporting numbers of private school children attending used in the allocation of funds provided to private schools did not agree to the allocation calculation. Context Two participating private schools are within the District’s service area. The supporting documentation for students attending both of these participating private schools did not agree to the allocation calculations. Cause The District did not maintain proper supporting documentation to support the number of students from participating private schools. Effect Allocation of Title I funding provided to local private schools may not be correct. Questioned Costs None Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the District retain all supporting documentation in accordance with their record retention policies and ensure the supporting documentation and the information used in the allocation calculations agree. Management’s Response The discrepancy stemmed from the timing of data collection for the nonpublic schools. Worksheet G was initially completed using estimated numbers during a different month (October) than when final numbers were collected, resulting in a mismatch with the Final Rank & Serve data. Although the final numbers used were those approved by DPI, we do not have a corresponding Worksheet G to verify those figures from that specific month. Moving forward, we will collect Worksheet G forms monthly from our nonpublic schools -mirroring the process used for public schools through our child nutrition system. This will ensure consistent documentation and verification of data, and prevent future discrepancies. Additionally, we recognize that the nonpublic schools' systems are unable to retrieve historical free/reduced lunch data month by month, which reinforces the need for this proactive monthly collection.