Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐005: Cash Management (Material Weakness)
State Agency: Department of Agriculture
Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture
AL Number and Title: 10.179 – Micro-Grants for Food Security Program
Award Number and Award Year: AM200100XXXXG132 2020
21MGFSPHI1003-00 2021
AM22MGFSPHI1007-04 2022
23MGFSPHI1011-00 2023
Repeat Finding? No
Condition
During our audit, we examined 25 haphazardly selected drawdowns and identified 25 instances totaling approximately $55,000 in which the time elapsing between the receipt of federal award and the disbursement was greater than 25 days, ranging from 48 to 137 days. While the expenditures were allowable costs under the grant, it does not appear the State disbursed these federal advances as soon as administratively feasible.
Criteria
31 CFR Section 205.33 requires the State to minimize the time between the receipt of federal funds from the federal government and the State’s disbursement of the funds for federal program purposes. Therefore, the timing and amount of funds being requested and received must be as close as administratively feasible to the State’s actual cash outlay for direct program costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. Based on our testing, we determined 25 days to be a reasonable period of time to disburse cash after receipt from the federal government.
Effect
Without minimizing time between the drawdown and disbursement of federal funds, the State is not in compliance with federal requirements.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
The lag in disbursing funds was due to the limited personnel assigned to this program in comparison to the volume of disbursements to beneficiaries.
Recommendation
The State department should design and implement controls over monitoring cash management timeliness requirements, ensure program personnel are aware of all federal program requirements, and ensure there is adequate staffing for the program to comply with federal requirements.
Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐006: Cash Management (Material Weakness)
State Agency: Hawaii Technology Development Corporation (HTDC)
Federal Agency: Department of Defense
AL Number and Title: 12.400 – Military Construction, National Guard
Award Number and Award Year: W912J6-23-2-2102 2023
Repeat Finding? No
Condition
During our audit, we examined four haphazardly selected cash disbursements and identified an instance totaling approximately $60,000 in which the time elapsing between the receipt of the federal cash draw and the disbursement to vendor was greater than 45 days. For this instance, the time elapsed was 229 days. While the expenditures were allowable costs under the master cooperative agreement, the State did not disburse these federal advances within National Guard Bureau requirements.
Criteria
National Guard Regulations 5-1, National Guard Grants and Cooperative Agreements Chapter 11-5: Advance Payment Method, requires the State to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the federal government and its disbursement to no more than 45 days.
Effect
The delay in disbursing advances of federal funding results in the State not complying with federal cash management requirements.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
The delay was attributed to the draw down of federal funds by the State Department of Defense and transferring the funds to HTDC for disbursement to contractors.
Recommendation
We recommend that HTDC design and implement internal controls over the monitoring of cash management and ensure personnel are aware of cash management requirements.
Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐007: Special Tests and Provisions (Material Weakness)
State Agency: DLIR
Federal Agency: Department of Labor
AL Number and Title: 17.225 – Unemployment Insurance
Award Number and Award Year: 24‐55‐A‐55-UI-000068 2024
Repeat Finding? Yes
Condition
During our audit, we examined the Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) summary report and identified that minimum cases requirements were not met for paid claims.
Criteria
Pursuant to 20 CFR Part 602, the BAM system requires the State department to complete a minimum number of unemployment cases timely in order to maintain a current database. The minimum number of cases for completing paid claims is 480 cases.
Effect
Failure to meet minimum case requirements prevents the granting agency from maintaining a current database.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
Due to the COVID‐19 pandemic, the department experienced a staffing shortage and was unable to process the minimum number of cases and/or investigate cases within a timely manner.
Recommendation
We recommend that the State department address staffing shortages and develop new policies and procedures to handle the increase in unemployment claims and follow existing policies and procedures established to comply with claim handling requirements, as necessary.
Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐007: Special Tests and Provisions (Material Weakness)
State Agency: DLIR
Federal Agency: Department of Labor
AL Number and Title: 17.225 – Unemployment Insurance
Award Number and Award Year: 24‐55‐A‐55-UI-000068 2024
Repeat Finding? Yes
Condition
During our audit, we examined the Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) summary report and identified that minimum cases requirements were not met for paid claims.
Criteria
Pursuant to 20 CFR Part 602, the BAM system requires the State department to complete a minimum number of unemployment cases timely in order to maintain a current database. The minimum number of cases for completing paid claims is 480 cases.
Effect
Failure to meet minimum case requirements prevents the granting agency from maintaining a current database.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
Due to the COVID‐19 pandemic, the department experienced a staffing shortage and was unable to process the minimum number of cases and/or investigate cases within a timely manner.
Recommendation
We recommend that the State department address staffing shortages and develop new policies and procedures to handle the increase in unemployment claims and follow existing policies and procedures established to comply with claim handling requirements, as necessary.
Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐008: Earmarking (Significant Deficiency)
State Agency: DLIR
Federal Agency: Department of Labor
AL Number and Title: 17.258 – WIOA Adult Program
17.259 – WIOA Youth Activities
17.278 – WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant
(WIOA Cluster)
Award Number and Award Year: AA347643L0 2022
AA347645P0 2022
Repeat Finding? Yes
Condition
During our audit, we noted a total of 15.63% of funds were allocated for employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers.
Criteria
According to Section 129(b) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, not more than 15% of funds allocated shall be used to provide employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers.
Effect
Failure to comply with the award’s earmarking requirements results in noncompliance with the terms of the award and could result in sanctions by the awarding agency.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
When the initial award is provided to the various subrecipients, program personnel allocate amounts in accordance with earmarking requirements. However, as actual results differ from the budget, program personnel became aware of noncompliance at the close of the award.
Recommendation
We recommend that program management establish policies and procedures with subrecipients to ensure earmarking requirements are met.
Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐008: Earmarking (Significant Deficiency)
State Agency: DLIR
Federal Agency: Department of Labor
AL Number and Title: 17.258 – WIOA Adult Program
17.259 – WIOA Youth Activities
17.278 – WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant
(WIOA Cluster)
Award Number and Award Year: AA347643L0 2022
AA347645P0 2022
Repeat Finding? Yes
Condition
During our audit, we noted a total of 15.63% of funds were allocated for employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers.
Criteria
According to Section 129(b) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, not more than 15% of funds allocated shall be used to provide employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers.
Effect
Failure to comply with the award’s earmarking requirements results in noncompliance with the terms of the award and could result in sanctions by the awarding agency.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
When the initial award is provided to the various subrecipients, program personnel allocate amounts in accordance with earmarking requirements. However, as actual results differ from the budget, program personnel became aware of noncompliance at the close of the award.
Recommendation
We recommend that program management establish policies and procedures with subrecipients to ensure earmarking requirements are met.
Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐008: Earmarking (Significant Deficiency)
State Agency: DLIR
Federal Agency: Department of Labor
AL Number and Title: 17.258 – WIOA Adult Program
17.259 – WIOA Youth Activities
17.278 – WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant
(WIOA Cluster)
Award Number and Award Year: AA347643L0 2022
AA347645P0 2022
Repeat Finding? Yes
Condition
During our audit, we noted a total of 15.63% of funds were allocated for employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers.
Criteria
According to Section 129(b) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, not more than 15% of funds allocated shall be used to provide employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers.
Effect
Failure to comply with the award’s earmarking requirements results in noncompliance with the terms of the award and could result in sanctions by the awarding agency.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
When the initial award is provided to the various subrecipients, program personnel allocate amounts in accordance with earmarking requirements. However, as actual results differ from the budget, program personnel became aware of noncompliance at the close of the award.
Recommendation
We recommend that program management establish policies and procedures with subrecipients to ensure earmarking requirements are met.
Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐005: Cash Management (Material Weakness)
State Agency: Department of Agriculture
Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture
AL Number and Title: 10.179 – Micro-Grants for Food Security Program
Award Number and Award Year: AM200100XXXXG132 2020
21MGFSPHI1003-00 2021
AM22MGFSPHI1007-04 2022
23MGFSPHI1011-00 2023
Repeat Finding? No
Condition
During our audit, we examined 25 haphazardly selected drawdowns and identified 25 instances totaling approximately $55,000 in which the time elapsing between the receipt of federal award and the disbursement was greater than 25 days, ranging from 48 to 137 days. While the expenditures were allowable costs under the grant, it does not appear the State disbursed these federal advances as soon as administratively feasible.
Criteria
31 CFR Section 205.33 requires the State to minimize the time between the receipt of federal funds from the federal government and the State’s disbursement of the funds for federal program purposes. Therefore, the timing and amount of funds being requested and received must be as close as administratively feasible to the State’s actual cash outlay for direct program costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. Based on our testing, we determined 25 days to be a reasonable period of time to disburse cash after receipt from the federal government.
Effect
Without minimizing time between the drawdown and disbursement of federal funds, the State is not in compliance with federal requirements.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
The lag in disbursing funds was due to the limited personnel assigned to this program in comparison to the volume of disbursements to beneficiaries.
Recommendation
The State department should design and implement controls over monitoring cash management timeliness requirements, ensure program personnel are aware of all federal program requirements, and ensure there is adequate staffing for the program to comply with federal requirements.
Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐006: Cash Management (Material Weakness)
State Agency: Hawaii Technology Development Corporation (HTDC)
Federal Agency: Department of Defense
AL Number and Title: 12.400 – Military Construction, National Guard
Award Number and Award Year: W912J6-23-2-2102 2023
Repeat Finding? No
Condition
During our audit, we examined four haphazardly selected cash disbursements and identified an instance totaling approximately $60,000 in which the time elapsing between the receipt of the federal cash draw and the disbursement to vendor was greater than 45 days. For this instance, the time elapsed was 229 days. While the expenditures were allowable costs under the master cooperative agreement, the State did not disburse these federal advances within National Guard Bureau requirements.
Criteria
National Guard Regulations 5-1, National Guard Grants and Cooperative Agreements Chapter 11-5: Advance Payment Method, requires the State to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the federal government and its disbursement to no more than 45 days.
Effect
The delay in disbursing advances of federal funding results in the State not complying with federal cash management requirements.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
The delay was attributed to the draw down of federal funds by the State Department of Defense and transferring the funds to HTDC for disbursement to contractors.
Recommendation
We recommend that HTDC design and implement internal controls over the monitoring of cash management and ensure personnel are aware of cash management requirements.
Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐007: Special Tests and Provisions (Material Weakness)
State Agency: DLIR
Federal Agency: Department of Labor
AL Number and Title: 17.225 – Unemployment Insurance
Award Number and Award Year: 24‐55‐A‐55-UI-000068 2024
Repeat Finding? Yes
Condition
During our audit, we examined the Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) summary report and identified that minimum cases requirements were not met for paid claims.
Criteria
Pursuant to 20 CFR Part 602, the BAM system requires the State department to complete a minimum number of unemployment cases timely in order to maintain a current database. The minimum number of cases for completing paid claims is 480 cases.
Effect
Failure to meet minimum case requirements prevents the granting agency from maintaining a current database.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
Due to the COVID‐19 pandemic, the department experienced a staffing shortage and was unable to process the minimum number of cases and/or investigate cases within a timely manner.
Recommendation
We recommend that the State department address staffing shortages and develop new policies and procedures to handle the increase in unemployment claims and follow existing policies and procedures established to comply with claim handling requirements, as necessary.
Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐007: Special Tests and Provisions (Material Weakness)
State Agency: DLIR
Federal Agency: Department of Labor
AL Number and Title: 17.225 – Unemployment Insurance
Award Number and Award Year: 24‐55‐A‐55-UI-000068 2024
Repeat Finding? Yes
Condition
During our audit, we examined the Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) summary report and identified that minimum cases requirements were not met for paid claims.
Criteria
Pursuant to 20 CFR Part 602, the BAM system requires the State department to complete a minimum number of unemployment cases timely in order to maintain a current database. The minimum number of cases for completing paid claims is 480 cases.
Effect
Failure to meet minimum case requirements prevents the granting agency from maintaining a current database.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
Due to the COVID‐19 pandemic, the department experienced a staffing shortage and was unable to process the minimum number of cases and/or investigate cases within a timely manner.
Recommendation
We recommend that the State department address staffing shortages and develop new policies and procedures to handle the increase in unemployment claims and follow existing policies and procedures established to comply with claim handling requirements, as necessary.
Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐008: Earmarking (Significant Deficiency)
State Agency: DLIR
Federal Agency: Department of Labor
AL Number and Title: 17.258 – WIOA Adult Program
17.259 – WIOA Youth Activities
17.278 – WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant
(WIOA Cluster)
Award Number and Award Year: AA347643L0 2022
AA347645P0 2022
Repeat Finding? Yes
Condition
During our audit, we noted a total of 15.63% of funds were allocated for employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers.
Criteria
According to Section 129(b) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, not more than 15% of funds allocated shall be used to provide employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers.
Effect
Failure to comply with the award’s earmarking requirements results in noncompliance with the terms of the award and could result in sanctions by the awarding agency.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
When the initial award is provided to the various subrecipients, program personnel allocate amounts in accordance with earmarking requirements. However, as actual results differ from the budget, program personnel became aware of noncompliance at the close of the award.
Recommendation
We recommend that program management establish policies and procedures with subrecipients to ensure earmarking requirements are met.
Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐008: Earmarking (Significant Deficiency)
State Agency: DLIR
Federal Agency: Department of Labor
AL Number and Title: 17.258 – WIOA Adult Program
17.259 – WIOA Youth Activities
17.278 – WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant
(WIOA Cluster)
Award Number and Award Year: AA347643L0 2022
AA347645P0 2022
Repeat Finding? Yes
Condition
During our audit, we noted a total of 15.63% of funds were allocated for employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers.
Criteria
According to Section 129(b) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, not more than 15% of funds allocated shall be used to provide employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers.
Effect
Failure to comply with the award’s earmarking requirements results in noncompliance with the terms of the award and could result in sanctions by the awarding agency.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
When the initial award is provided to the various subrecipients, program personnel allocate amounts in accordance with earmarking requirements. However, as actual results differ from the budget, program personnel became aware of noncompliance at the close of the award.
Recommendation
We recommend that program management establish policies and procedures with subrecipients to ensure earmarking requirements are met.
Questioned Cost $-
Finding No. 2024‐008: Earmarking (Significant Deficiency)
State Agency: DLIR
Federal Agency: Department of Labor
AL Number and Title: 17.258 – WIOA Adult Program
17.259 – WIOA Youth Activities
17.278 – WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grant
(WIOA Cluster)
Award Number and Award Year: AA347643L0 2022
AA347645P0 2022
Repeat Finding? Yes
Condition
During our audit, we noted a total of 15.63% of funds were allocated for employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers.
Criteria
According to Section 129(b) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, not more than 15% of funds allocated shall be used to provide employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers.
Effect
Failure to comply with the award’s earmarking requirements results in noncompliance with the terms of the award and could result in sanctions by the awarding agency.
Cause and View of Responsible Officials
When the initial award is provided to the various subrecipients, program personnel allocate amounts in accordance with earmarking requirements. However, as actual results differ from the budget, program personnel became aware of noncompliance at the close of the award.
Recommendation
We recommend that program management establish policies and procedures with subrecipients to ensure earmarking requirements are met.