Audit 349811

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$6.08M
Findings
4
Programs
2
Organization: Mary Crane League (IL)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-28
Auditor: Porte Brown LLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
539103 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - B
539104 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - M
1115545 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - B
1115546 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - M

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.600 Head Start $5.83M Yes 2
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $256,947 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
CLWGGNJHMCP5 Kristina Phillips Auditee
7732655954 Megan Angle Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of Mary Crane League (the “Center”) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Center, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Center.
Title: SUBRECIPIENTS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The Center provided $511,749 to subrecipeints from the federal awards listed.
Title: NON-CASH ASSISTANCE Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The Center had no non-cash assistance, federal insurance, or loan guarantees to be disclosed as required by the Uniform Guidance.
Title: LOANS OUTSTANDING Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. There were no loans outstanding at June 30, 2024 related to the federal awards listed.
Title: DONATED PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The Organization has not received any property and equipment to be disclosed as required by Uniform Guidance during the year ended June 30, 2024.

Finding Details

Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(h)(8)(i) requires that amounts of personnel expenses are properly documented and include appropriate controls and documentation to support the distribution of the employee's wages among specific activities if the employee works on more than one award. Condition: Of the testing population of 40 payroll transactions tested, for 10 transactions the Center was unable to provide a timesheet or other documentation to substantiate the application of the individual's time for that period. Cause: Due to limited staffing resources, the Center was not able to ensure maintenance of adequate documentation. Effect: The Center is not able to demonstrate that the personnel expenses allocated to the grant was proper and ensure avoidance of duplication of funding requests for the same amounts. Questioned Costs: Our sample of 40 items consisted of $76,186 in costs of which $1,384 were identified as known questioned costs. This amount was extrapolated for the total payroll costs of $3,173,321 which results in an extrapolated value of $57,656 of likely questioned costs. Recommendation: Management should review and refine its process of tracking payroll costs by grant to ensure that the costs are supported by a system of internal controls which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, are properly allocated, and reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding; see corrective action plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(b)(1) requires every subaward to include required information and is clearly identified. Condition: Review of the agreements with three subrecipients identified certain communications required were not included in the language of the agreement. Cause: The Center was not aware of the information that is required to be included in the subaward agreement. Effect: The Center was not in compliance with 2 CFR 200.332(b)(1). Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should review and refine its subaward agreements to include the necessary information as required by 2 CFR 200.332(b)(1). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding; see corrective action plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(h)(8)(i) requires that amounts of personnel expenses are properly documented and include appropriate controls and documentation to support the distribution of the employee's wages among specific activities if the employee works on more than one award. Condition: Of the testing population of 40 payroll transactions tested, for 10 transactions the Center was unable to provide a timesheet or other documentation to substantiate the application of the individual's time for that period. Cause: Due to limited staffing resources, the Center was not able to ensure maintenance of adequate documentation. Effect: The Center is not able to demonstrate that the personnel expenses allocated to the grant was proper and ensure avoidance of duplication of funding requests for the same amounts. Questioned Costs: Our sample of 40 items consisted of $76,186 in costs of which $1,384 were identified as known questioned costs. This amount was extrapolated for the total payroll costs of $3,173,321 which results in an extrapolated value of $57,656 of likely questioned costs. Recommendation: Management should review and refine its process of tracking payroll costs by grant to ensure that the costs are supported by a system of internal controls which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, are properly allocated, and reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding; see corrective action plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(b)(1) requires every subaward to include required information and is clearly identified. Condition: Review of the agreements with three subrecipients identified certain communications required were not included in the language of the agreement. Cause: The Center was not aware of the information that is required to be included in the subaward agreement. Effect: The Center was not in compliance with 2 CFR 200.332(b)(1). Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should review and refine its subaward agreements to include the necessary information as required by 2 CFR 200.332(b)(1). Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding; see corrective action plan.