Audit 349782

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$84.80M
Findings
2
Programs
7
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-28
Auditor: Kpmg

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
539081 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1115523 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes N

Contacts

Name Title Type
MB5GWJCFBGC7 April Tory Auditee
7148226320 Spencer Endicott Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Organization Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all federal award programs of the University. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the University. For the purposes of the Schedule, federal awards include all grants and contracts entered into directly between the University and agencies and departments of the federal government and pass-through agencies. The awards are classified into major program categories in accordance with the provisions of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), for Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University utilized an 8% IDC rate, negotiated with the US Department of Education, the cognizant agency for the University. University of Massachusetts Global, a not-for-profit institution of higher learning, and its blended component unit, CBE Educational Services Company, Inc., (CBEESC) a taxable corporation (collectively, the University), are located in Orange County, California, and Washington D.C. respectively. University of Massachusetts Global is a component unit of the University of Massachusetts.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all federal award programs of the University. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the University. For the purposes of the Schedule, federal awards include all grants and contracts entered into directly between the University and agencies and departments of the federal government and pass-through agencies. The awards are classified into major program categories in accordance with the provisions of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), for Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University utilized an 8% IDC rate, negotiated with the US Department of Education, the cognizant agency for the University. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all federal award programs of the University. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the University. For the purposes of the Schedule, federal awards include all grants and contracts entered into directly between the University and agencies and departments of the federal government and pass-through agencies. The awards are classified into major program categories in accordance with the provisions of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), for Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.
Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all federal award programs of the University. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the University. For the purposes of the Schedule, federal awards include all grants and contracts entered into directly between the University and agencies and departments of the federal government and pass-through agencies. The awards are classified into major program categories in accordance with the provisions of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), for Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University utilized an 8% IDC rate, negotiated with the US Department of Education, the cognizant agency for the University. The information in the Schedule is prepared based on the accrual basis of accounting and is also presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Therefore, some amounts presented in the Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements.
Title: Relationship to Federal Financial Reports Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all federal award programs of the University. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the University. For the purposes of the Schedule, federal awards include all grants and contracts entered into directly between the University and agencies and departments of the federal government and pass-through agencies. The awards are classified into major program categories in accordance with the provisions of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), for Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University utilized an 8% IDC rate, negotiated with the US Department of Education, the cognizant agency for the University. Amounts reported in the Schedule agree in all material respects with the amounts reported in the related federal financial reports.
Title: Federal Direct Loans Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all federal award programs of the University. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the University. For the purposes of the Schedule, federal awards include all grants and contracts entered into directly between the University and agencies and departments of the federal government and pass-through agencies. The awards are classified into major program categories in accordance with the provisions of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), for Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University utilized an 8% IDC rate, negotiated with the US Department of Education, the cognizant agency for the University. Federal Direct Loans are made by the Department of Education. The University is responsible for the performance of certain administrative duties under the Direct Loan program including origination and disbursement of loans. A summary of these loans for the year ended June 30, 2024 is as follows: (see the Notes to the SEFA for table)

Finding Details

Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans Program Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024 Criteria: Per 34 CFR Section 685.309, institutions with direct loan programs must report enrollment information within 30 days whenever attendance changes for students, unless a roster will be submitted within 60 days. An institution must notify the Secretary of Education if it discovers that a loan under Title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period in which the loan was intended. The Department of Education lists several certification methods for enrollment reporting, including certifying directly through the National Students Loan Data System (NSLDS) web site, or certifying through NSLDS’s batch enrollment reporting process. Additionally, there are two categories of enrollment information within NSLDS, “Campus Level” and “Program Level,” both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. Condition and Context: It was identified that the University did not have effective internal controls over the review of student program and campus level data changes submitted to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). In our sample of 40 students over the enrollment reporting compliance requirement, we identified 9 students who had changes that were not submitted timely and 15 students whose campus or program level information was not submitted accurately to the NSLDS. Cause and Effect: The University’s control failed in detecting that untimely and inaccurate information was reported to NSLDS. Qustioned Costs: None noted. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls to ensure all information submitted to NSLDS is reviewed for accuracy on a timely basis. View of Responsible Officials: University of Massachusetts Global concurs with this finding. The University utilizes the services of National Student Clearinghouse to report student status data to the NSLDS. There were certain students with statuses that did not match between program and campus level records, and one student who withdrew from the University, but was not properly reported within the 60 day requirement. To address this, the registrar will review system generated reports to match NSLDS reporting guides and closely monitor when files are processed and reported to NSLDS.
Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans Program Federal Agency: Department of Education Award Year: July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024 Criteria: Per 34 CFR Section 685.309, institutions with direct loan programs must report enrollment information within 30 days whenever attendance changes for students, unless a roster will be submitted within 60 days. An institution must notify the Secretary of Education if it discovers that a loan under Title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period in which the loan was intended. The Department of Education lists several certification methods for enrollment reporting, including certifying directly through the National Students Loan Data System (NSLDS) web site, or certifying through NSLDS’s batch enrollment reporting process. Additionally, there are two categories of enrollment information within NSLDS, “Campus Level” and “Program Level,” both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. Condition and Context: It was identified that the University did not have effective internal controls over the review of student program and campus level data changes submitted to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). In our sample of 40 students over the enrollment reporting compliance requirement, we identified 9 students who had changes that were not submitted timely and 15 students whose campus or program level information was not submitted accurately to the NSLDS. Cause and Effect: The University’s control failed in detecting that untimely and inaccurate information was reported to NSLDS. Qustioned Costs: None noted. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls to ensure all information submitted to NSLDS is reviewed for accuracy on a timely basis. View of Responsible Officials: University of Massachusetts Global concurs with this finding. The University utilizes the services of National Student Clearinghouse to report student status data to the NSLDS. There were certain students with statuses that did not match between program and campus level records, and one student who withdrew from the University, but was not properly reported within the 60 day requirement. To address this, the registrar will review system generated reports to match NSLDS reporting guides and closely monitor when files are processed and reported to NSLDS.