Audit 349329

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$2.47M
Findings
4
Programs
1
Organization: Hawaii Tourism Authority (HI)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-27
Auditor: Accuity LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
538284 2024-001 Material Weakness - L
538285 2024-002 Material Weakness - L
1114726 2024-001 Material Weakness - L
1114727 2024-002 Material Weakness - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
11.307 Economic Adjustment Assistance $2.47M Yes 2

Contacts

Name Title Type
JQNUUBK62Y28 Talon Kishi Auditee
8089732275 Ryan Horiuchi Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: 1. Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures in the Schedule are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: 3. Indirect Cost Rate The Authority has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of the Hawaii Tourism Authority (the “Authority”) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024 and is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of the Authority.

Finding Details

Questioned Costs Finding No. 2024 001: Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Reporting (Material Weakness) $ – Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce Assistance Listing Number and Title: 11.307 Economic Development Cluster Award Number: 07-79-07800 Condition During our audit, we noted an instance in which the Hawaii Tourism Authority (the “Authority”) did not complete the reporting required by Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (“FFATA”) for a subgrant made during 2024. Transactions Tested Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements 2 2 0 0 0 Dollar Amount of Tested Transactions Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements $7,200,000 $7,200,000 $0 $0 $0 Criteria Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the FFATA requires an entity to report subcontracts made under federally-awarded contracts by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any subgrant greater than or equal to $30,000. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The lack of FFATA reporting may be attributed to general oversight by Authority management. Authority management noted that due to the lack of adequate staffing, the completion of non-routine reporting requirements such as those included in the FFATA were delayed. Effect Failure to file required reports reduces transparency on the use of program funds and represents an instance of noncompliance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200. Context A sample of one subgrant and one amendment to the subgrant greater than or equal to $30,000 totaling $7,200,000 were selected for audit from a population of $7,200,000 in subgrants greater than or equal to $30,000 from the Economic Development Cluster Program. Our test found two instances in which a FFATA report was not completed in a timely manner. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that Authority management understand all requirements for federal awards and ensure that required FFATA reports are completed in a timely and accurate manner.
Questioned Costs Finding No. 2024 002: Reporting (Material Weakness) $ – Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce Assistance Listing Number and Title: 11.307 Economic Development Cluster Award Number: 07-79-07800 Condition During our audit, we noted the Authority reported an excess amount of $533,990 in federal expenditures in the semi-annual SF-425 federal financial report submitted for the period ended March 31, 2024. Furthermore, we noted that the excess expenditures as reported on the semi-annual SF-425 federal financial report pertained to items for which the associated goods or services were received by the Authority after the report period end date. Criteria Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 requires that the determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The lack of accurate reporting may be attributed to general oversight by Authority management when determining the actual amount of federally funded expenditures incurred during the reporting period. Authority management believes that the expenditures as reported in the semi-annual SF-425 federal financial report submitted for the period ended March 31, 2024 are accurate, however management will implement additional procedures as requested by the external auditor. Effect Failure to file accurate information in reports represents an instance of noncompliance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200. Entities must also maintain accurate records of financial information, which are submitted to the Federal Agencies in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200. Context A sample of one semi-annual SF-425 federal financial report was selected for audit from a population of two reports for the Economic Development Cluster Program. Our test found that the report did not accurately state the federal share of expenditures incurred during the reporting period. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that Authority management be more diligent in following their policies and procedures for the preparation and review of federal financial reports to ensure the accuracy of information submitted.
Questioned Costs Finding No. 2024 001: Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Reporting (Material Weakness) $ – Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce Assistance Listing Number and Title: 11.307 Economic Development Cluster Award Number: 07-79-07800 Condition During our audit, we noted an instance in which the Hawaii Tourism Authority (the “Authority”) did not complete the reporting required by Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (“FFATA”) for a subgrant made during 2024. Transactions Tested Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements 2 2 0 0 0 Dollar Amount of Tested Transactions Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements $7,200,000 $7,200,000 $0 $0 $0 Criteria Section 2, Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, of the FFATA requires an entity to report subcontracts made under federally-awarded contracts by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any subgrant greater than or equal to $30,000. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The lack of FFATA reporting may be attributed to general oversight by Authority management. Authority management noted that due to the lack of adequate staffing, the completion of non-routine reporting requirements such as those included in the FFATA were delayed. Effect Failure to file required reports reduces transparency on the use of program funds and represents an instance of noncompliance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200. Context A sample of one subgrant and one amendment to the subgrant greater than or equal to $30,000 totaling $7,200,000 were selected for audit from a population of $7,200,000 in subgrants greater than or equal to $30,000 from the Economic Development Cluster Program. Our test found two instances in which a FFATA report was not completed in a timely manner. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that Authority management understand all requirements for federal awards and ensure that required FFATA reports are completed in a timely and accurate manner.
Questioned Costs Finding No. 2024 002: Reporting (Material Weakness) $ – Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce Assistance Listing Number and Title: 11.307 Economic Development Cluster Award Number: 07-79-07800 Condition During our audit, we noted the Authority reported an excess amount of $533,990 in federal expenditures in the semi-annual SF-425 federal financial report submitted for the period ended March 31, 2024. Furthermore, we noted that the excess expenditures as reported on the semi-annual SF-425 federal financial report pertained to items for which the associated goods or services were received by the Authority after the report period end date. Criteria Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 requires that the determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Cause and View of Responsible Officials The lack of accurate reporting may be attributed to general oversight by Authority management when determining the actual amount of federally funded expenditures incurred during the reporting period. Authority management believes that the expenditures as reported in the semi-annual SF-425 federal financial report submitted for the period ended March 31, 2024 are accurate, however management will implement additional procedures as requested by the external auditor. Effect Failure to file accurate information in reports represents an instance of noncompliance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200. Entities must also maintain accurate records of financial information, which are submitted to the Federal Agencies in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200. Context A sample of one semi-annual SF-425 federal financial report was selected for audit from a population of two reports for the Economic Development Cluster Program. Our test found that the report did not accurately state the federal share of expenditures incurred during the reporting period. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that Authority management be more diligent in following their policies and procedures for the preparation and review of federal financial reports to ensure the accuracy of information submitted.