Audit 349023

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.18M
Findings
2
Programs
11
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-27

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
538014 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
1114456 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - AB

Contacts

Name Title Type
SDMUGVGH5LM1 Dawn Hauck Auditee
7017665201 Matt Laughlin Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the "Schedule”) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying Schedule includes the federal award activity of Rugby Public School District No. 5 under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Rugby Public School District No. 5, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of the District.
Title: PASS-THROUGH ENTITIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the "Schedule”) are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. All pass-through entities listed above use the same Assistance Listing (AL) numbers as the federal grantors to identify these grants, and have not assigned any additional identifying numbers.

Finding Details

Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Significant Deficiency Federal Program 84.371 Comprehensive Literacy State Development Program Criteria The District should maintain documentation related to approved pay rates and Federal employment forms. In addition, the District should review controls to ensure rates paid agree to approved pay rates. Condition The District had payroll expenditures that had the following deficiencies: 1) Three employees working did not have the required USCIS Form I-9. 2) Two employees in which documentation of their approved pay rate was not available to be tested. 3) One employee who received salary payments less than the approved contracted amount. Questioned Costs None. Context A sample of forty (40) payroll expenditures were tested. This sample included payroll of each of the six employees associated with the program. Twenty (20) of the expenditures tested related to three (3) of the employees, which did not have supporting USCIS Form I-9 documentation. Twelve (12) of the expenditures tested related to two employees, which did not have approved pay rate documentation available for testing. Seven (7) of the expenditures tested related to one employee was not paid according to their employment agreement. Effect The District is not in compliance with their internal control system and compliance with requirements. Cause Employee documentation was not properly maintained in accordance with the District’s record retention policy. Employee salary rates were not properly checked against approved contracted rates. Recommendation The District should ensure all employees have completed USCIS Form I-9 and that this documentation is securely stored and regularly reviewed. The District should cross-check payroll against approved pay rates to verify accuracy. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding View of Responsible Officials See corrective action plan.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Significant Deficiency Federal Program 84.371 Comprehensive Literacy State Development Program Criteria The District should maintain documentation related to approved pay rates and Federal employment forms. In addition, the District should review controls to ensure rates paid agree to approved pay rates. Condition The District had payroll expenditures that had the following deficiencies: 1) Three employees working did not have the required USCIS Form I-9. 2) Two employees in which documentation of their approved pay rate was not available to be tested. 3) One employee who received salary payments less than the approved contracted amount. Questioned Costs None. Context A sample of forty (40) payroll expenditures were tested. This sample included payroll of each of the six employees associated with the program. Twenty (20) of the expenditures tested related to three (3) of the employees, which did not have supporting USCIS Form I-9 documentation. Twelve (12) of the expenditures tested related to two employees, which did not have approved pay rate documentation available for testing. Seven (7) of the expenditures tested related to one employee was not paid according to their employment agreement. Effect The District is not in compliance with their internal control system and compliance with requirements. Cause Employee documentation was not properly maintained in accordance with the District’s record retention policy. Employee salary rates were not properly checked against approved contracted rates. Recommendation The District should ensure all employees have completed USCIS Form I-9 and that this documentation is securely stored and regularly reviewed. The District should cross-check payroll against approved pay rates to verify accuracy. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding View of Responsible Officials See corrective action plan.