Audit 348225

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$2.67M
Findings
0
Programs
5
Organization: City of Tehachapi (CA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-25

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
FWZLF5N9FP79 Hamed Jones Auditee
6618222200 Brett Van Lant Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported using the modified accrual basis of accounting for governmental funds and the accrual basis for proprietary funds, which is described in Note 1 of the notes to the City’s financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass through entity identifying numbers are presented when available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Elected not to use The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the City of Tehachapi (the City) under programs of the federal government as well as federal financial assistance passed through other government agencies for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial statements of the City. The City’s reporting entity is defined in Note 1 of the notes to the City’s financial statements.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported using the modified accrual basis of accounting for governmental funds and the accrual basis for proprietary funds, which is described in Note 1 of the notes to the City’s financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass through entity identifying numbers are presented when available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Elected not to use Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported using the modified accrual basis of accounting for governmental funds and the accrual basis for proprietary funds, which is described in Note 1 of the notes to the City’s financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass through entity identifying numbers are presented when available. The City elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Contingencies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported using the modified accrual basis of accounting for governmental funds and the accrual basis for proprietary funds, which is described in Note 1 of the notes to the City’s financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass through entity identifying numbers are presented when available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Elected not to use Under the terms of federal and state grants, additional audits may be requested by the grantor agencies, and certain costs may be questioned as not being appropriate expenditures under the terms of the grants. Such audits could lead to a request for reimbursement to the grantor agencies.