Audit 348020

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$8.48M
Findings
4
Programs
10
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-25
Auditor: Cbiz CPAS PC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
529947 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I
529948 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I
1106389 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I
1106390 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZTQNEHZTNHB3 Deepak Butani Auditee
2127216032 Joseph Kanjamala Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of the Organization under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the consolidated financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: NOTE 4 – HUD SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PROGRAM - 203K LOAN PROGRAM Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Organization has received a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development loan under the Supportive Housing Program 203k Loan Program. The loan balance outstanding at the beginning of the year is included in the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule. The balance of the loan outstanding as of June 30, 2024 was $6,186,955.

Finding Details

United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Passed through from: NYC Housing and Preservation Department Assistance Listing No. 14.267 Continuum of Care Criteria: As required by the 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326, nonfederal entities must follow the procurement standards required by that section in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The Organization did not adhere to their policy when selecting a vendor to purchase goods at their residential locations. In addition, the procurement policy of the Organization does not align with all requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not bid or procure for purchases of goods at their Euclid and Westbourne locations. Due to familiarity with the vendors, the Organization has been using them for the purchase of these goods and has not adhered to their procurement policy. Effect: The Organization is not adhering to their procurement policy and is not using a bidding process for the purchase of their goods. Context: We selected 4 vendors used that would require procurement procedures to obtain documented price or rate quotations from a number of qualified sources for testing whose purchases totaled approximately $57,000 to $165,000 for the fiscal year. The Organization could not provide us with the required documentation needed to comply with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review and update its procurement policy to align with what is required by the Uniform Guidance and procure all goods, services and material purchases greater than the threshold outlined in the then revised procurement policy and in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization has engaged a professional services firm in a consulting engagement to review and assist in revising their procurement policy to align its policies and procedures for procurement with Uniform Guidance.
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Passed through from: NYC Housing and Preservation Department Assistance Listing No. 14.267 Continuum of Care Criteria: As required by the 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326, nonfederal entities must follow the procurement standards required by that section in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The Organization did not adhere to their policy when selecting a vendor to purchase goods at their residential locations. In addition, the procurement policy of the Organization does not align with all requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not bid or procure for purchases of goods at their Euclid and Westbourne locations. Due to familiarity with the vendors, the Organization has been using them for the purchase of these goods and has not adhered to their procurement policy. Effect: The Organization is not adhering to their procurement policy and is not using a bidding process for the purchase of their goods. Context: We selected 4 vendors used that would require procurement procedures to obtain documented price or rate quotations from a number of qualified sources for testing whose purchases totaled approximately $57,000 to $165,000 for the fiscal year. The Organization could not provide us with the required documentation needed to comply with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review and update its procurement policy to align with what is required by the Uniform Guidance and procure all goods, services and material purchases greater than the threshold outlined in the then revised procurement policy and in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization has engaged a professional services firm in a consulting engagement to review and assist in revising their procurement policy to align its policies and procedures for procurement with Uniform Guidance.
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Passed through from: NYC Housing and Preservation Department Assistance Listing No. 14.267 Continuum of Care Criteria: As required by the 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326, nonfederal entities must follow the procurement standards required by that section in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The Organization did not adhere to their policy when selecting a vendor to purchase goods at their residential locations. In addition, the procurement policy of the Organization does not align with all requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not bid or procure for purchases of goods at their Euclid and Westbourne locations. Due to familiarity with the vendors, the Organization has been using them for the purchase of these goods and has not adhered to their procurement policy. Effect: The Organization is not adhering to their procurement policy and is not using a bidding process for the purchase of their goods. Context: We selected 4 vendors used that would require procurement procedures to obtain documented price or rate quotations from a number of qualified sources for testing whose purchases totaled approximately $57,000 to $165,000 for the fiscal year. The Organization could not provide us with the required documentation needed to comply with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review and update its procurement policy to align with what is required by the Uniform Guidance and procure all goods, services and material purchases greater than the threshold outlined in the then revised procurement policy and in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization has engaged a professional services firm in a consulting engagement to review and assist in revising their procurement policy to align its policies and procedures for procurement with Uniform Guidance.
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Passed through from: NYC Housing and Preservation Department Assistance Listing No. 14.267 Continuum of Care Criteria: As required by the 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326, nonfederal entities must follow the procurement standards required by that section in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The Organization did not adhere to their policy when selecting a vendor to purchase goods at their residential locations. In addition, the procurement policy of the Organization does not align with all requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not bid or procure for purchases of goods at their Euclid and Westbourne locations. Due to familiarity with the vendors, the Organization has been using them for the purchase of these goods and has not adhered to their procurement policy. Effect: The Organization is not adhering to their procurement policy and is not using a bidding process for the purchase of their goods. Context: We selected 4 vendors used that would require procurement procedures to obtain documented price or rate quotations from a number of qualified sources for testing whose purchases totaled approximately $57,000 to $165,000 for the fiscal year. The Organization could not provide us with the required documentation needed to comply with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review and update its procurement policy to align with what is required by the Uniform Guidance and procure all goods, services and material purchases greater than the threshold outlined in the then revised procurement policy and in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization has engaged a professional services firm in a consulting engagement to review and assist in revising their procurement policy to align its policies and procedures for procurement with Uniform Guidance.