Audit 348011

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$2.61M
Findings
12
Programs
14
Organization: Rosebud County (MT)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-25

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
529941 2024-011 Material Weakness - P
529942 2024-011 Material Weakness - P
529943 2024-011 Material Weakness - P
529944 2024-010 Material Weakness - I
529945 2024-010 Material Weakness - I
529946 2024-010 Material Weakness - I
1106383 2024-011 Material Weakness - P
1106384 2024-011 Material Weakness - P
1106385 2024-011 Material Weakness - P
1106386 2024-010 Material Weakness - I
1106387 2024-010 Material Weakness - I
1106388 2024-010 Material Weakness - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
YZLNB69PP3C3 Sally Wanner Auditee
4063467551 Curt Wyss Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of the government under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The Information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of the Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the government, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of the government. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The government has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of the government under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The Information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of the Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the government, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of the government.
Title: NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of the government under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The Information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of the Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the government, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of the government. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The government has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years
Title: NOTE 3 - INDIRECT COST RATES Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of the government under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The Information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of the Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the government, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of the government. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The government has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The government has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: NOTE 4 - DONATED PPE Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of the government under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The Information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of the Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the government, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of the government. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The government has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The estimated Fair Market Value (FMV) of donated PPE for the year ended June 30, 2024 was $0 (unaudited).

Finding Details

NONCOMPLIANCE WITH GRANT TERMS AND CONDITIONS; AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; AL No. 20.106, GRANT No’s 3-30-0029-019-2023, 3-30-0029-020-2023 and 3-30-0029-017-2022, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per section 19(b) of the grant contracts, the county must require prime contractors to comply with 2 CFR 180.330 when entering into lower-tier transactions with their contractors and sub-contractors. Condition: 1. The county did not monitor the prime contractor’s compliance with section 19(b) of the grant contract. Criteria: Special Conditions Section 29 of the grant contracts requires the county to abide by Buy American Executive Orders. Condition 2: The county did not have supporting documentation as to the source and origin of steel and manufactured products used on the grant funded projects. Cause: The county does not have a system in place that will allow full compliance with all grant terms and conditions. Effect: Non-compliance with grant terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward. The county should obtain the required certifications in order to verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Additionally, the county should request and retain supporting documentation as to the source and origin of steel and manufactured products as required by the Buy American Executive Orders. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH GRANT TERMS AND CONDITIONS; AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; AL No. 20.106, GRANT No’s 3-30-0029-019-2023, 3-30-0029-020-2023 and 3-30-0029-017-2022, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per section 19(b) of the grant contracts, the county must require prime contractors to comply with 2 CFR 180.330 when entering into lower-tier transactions with their contractors and sub-contractors. Condition: 1. The county did not monitor the prime contractor’s compliance with section 19(b) of the grant contract. Criteria: Special Conditions Section 29 of the grant contracts requires the county to abide by Buy American Executive Orders. Condition 2: The county did not have supporting documentation as to the source and origin of steel and manufactured products used on the grant funded projects. Cause: The county does not have a system in place that will allow full compliance with all grant terms and conditions. Effect: Non-compliance with grant terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward. The county should obtain the required certifications in order to verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Additionally, the county should request and retain supporting documentation as to the source and origin of steel and manufactured products as required by the Buy American Executive Orders. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH GRANT TERMS AND CONDITIONS; AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; AL No. 20.106, GRANT No’s 3-30-0029-019-2023, 3-30-0029-020-2023 and 3-30-0029-017-2022, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per section 19(b) of the grant contracts, the county must require prime contractors to comply with 2 CFR 180.330 when entering into lower-tier transactions with their contractors and sub-contractors. Condition: 1. The county did not monitor the prime contractor’s compliance with section 19(b) of the grant contract. Criteria: Special Conditions Section 29 of the grant contracts requires the county to abide by Buy American Executive Orders. Condition 2: The county did not have supporting documentation as to the source and origin of steel and manufactured products used on the grant funded projects. Cause: The county does not have a system in place that will allow full compliance with all grant terms and conditions. Effect: Non-compliance with grant terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward. The county should obtain the required certifications in order to verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Additionally, the county should request and retain supporting documentation as to the source and origin of steel and manufactured products as required by the Buy American Executive Orders. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, recipients are prohibited from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, recipients are prohibited from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, recipients are prohibited from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH GRANT TERMS AND CONDITIONS; AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; AL No. 20.106, GRANT No’s 3-30-0029-019-2023, 3-30-0029-020-2023 and 3-30-0029-017-2022, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per section 19(b) of the grant contracts, the county must require prime contractors to comply with 2 CFR 180.330 when entering into lower-tier transactions with their contractors and sub-contractors. Condition: 1. The county did not monitor the prime contractor’s compliance with section 19(b) of the grant contract. Criteria: Special Conditions Section 29 of the grant contracts requires the county to abide by Buy American Executive Orders. Condition 2: The county did not have supporting documentation as to the source and origin of steel and manufactured products used on the grant funded projects. Cause: The county does not have a system in place that will allow full compliance with all grant terms and conditions. Effect: Non-compliance with grant terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward. The county should obtain the required certifications in order to verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Additionally, the county should request and retain supporting documentation as to the source and origin of steel and manufactured products as required by the Buy American Executive Orders. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH GRANT TERMS AND CONDITIONS; AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; AL No. 20.106, GRANT No’s 3-30-0029-019-2023, 3-30-0029-020-2023 and 3-30-0029-017-2022, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per section 19(b) of the grant contracts, the county must require prime contractors to comply with 2 CFR 180.330 when entering into lower-tier transactions with their contractors and sub-contractors. Condition: 1. The county did not monitor the prime contractor’s compliance with section 19(b) of the grant contract. Criteria: Special Conditions Section 29 of the grant contracts requires the county to abide by Buy American Executive Orders. Condition 2: The county did not have supporting documentation as to the source and origin of steel and manufactured products used on the grant funded projects. Cause: The county does not have a system in place that will allow full compliance with all grant terms and conditions. Effect: Non-compliance with grant terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward. The county should obtain the required certifications in order to verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Additionally, the county should request and retain supporting documentation as to the source and origin of steel and manufactured products as required by the Buy American Executive Orders. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH GRANT TERMS AND CONDITIONS; AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; AL No. 20.106, GRANT No’s 3-30-0029-019-2023, 3-30-0029-020-2023 and 3-30-0029-017-2022, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per section 19(b) of the grant contracts, the county must require prime contractors to comply with 2 CFR 180.330 when entering into lower-tier transactions with their contractors and sub-contractors. Condition: 1. The county did not monitor the prime contractor’s compliance with section 19(b) of the grant contract. Criteria: Special Conditions Section 29 of the grant contracts requires the county to abide by Buy American Executive Orders. Condition 2: The county did not have supporting documentation as to the source and origin of steel and manufactured products used on the grant funded projects. Cause: The county does not have a system in place that will allow full compliance with all grant terms and conditions. Effect: Non-compliance with grant terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward. The county should obtain the required certifications in order to verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Additionally, the county should request and retain supporting documentation as to the source and origin of steel and manufactured products as required by the Buy American Executive Orders. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, recipients are prohibited from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, recipients are prohibited from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, recipients are prohibited from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.