FAC Explorer

Audit 347315

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.87M
Findings
6
Programs
9
Organization: Blue River Valley Schools (IN)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-21
Auditor: Crowe LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
529270 2024-001 Material Weakness - E
529271 2024-001 Material Weakness - E
529272 2024-001 Material Weakness - E
1105712 2024-001 Material Weakness - E
1105713 2024-001 Material Weakness - E
1105714 2024-001 Material Weakness - E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $342,503 Yes 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program $182,864 Yes 1
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $113,260 - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $52,478 Yes 1
84.027 Special Education Grants to States $31,166 - 0
84.358 Rural Education $30,810 - 0
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) $11,064 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $8,452 - 0
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants $2,491 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
D4XPGZPJWEQ6 Kim Riley Auditee
7658364816 Scott Nickerson Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School Corporation has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. A. Basis of Presentation The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) includes the federal grant activity of the School Corporation under programs of the federal government for the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024. The information in the SEFA is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the SEFA presents only a select portion of the operations of the School Corporation, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position of the School Corporation. The Uniform Guidance requires an annual audit of nonfederal entities expending a total amount of federal awards equal to or in excess of $750,000 in any fiscal year unless by constitution or statute a less frequent audit is required. In accordance with Indiana Code (IC 5-11-1-25), audits of school corporations shall be conducted biennially. Such audits shall include both years within the biennial period. B. Other Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received.
Title: NOTE 2 - INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School Corporation has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The School Corporation has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: NOTE 3 - OTHER INFORMATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School Corporation has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The School Corporation did not have any subrecipient activity for the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024.
Title: NOTE 4 - NON-CASH PROGRAMS (COMMODITIES) Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School Corporation has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Commodities donated to the School Corporation by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) of $52,478 are valued based on the USDA’s donated commodity price list. These are shown as part of the National School Lunch Program (10.555).

Finding Details

Finding 2024-001
Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with eligibility requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $540 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over eligibility determinations for free and reduced meals, we noted there was no formal review control in place for 26 of the 60 applications selected for testing. Additionally, for one of the 60 selections, the student was improperly classified as free when the annual income per the student’s application exceeded the corresponding threshold for that determination. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to review all applications to determine if the student qualifies for free or reduced meals. There should be a formal sign off in place that the application has been reviewed and the student’s classification of free or reduced is appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001
Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with eligibility requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $540 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over eligibility determinations for free and reduced meals, we noted there was no formal review control in place for 26 of the 60 applications selected for testing. Additionally, for one of the 60 selections, the student was improperly classified as free when the annual income per the student’s application exceeded the corresponding threshold for that determination. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to review all applications to determine if the student qualifies for free or reduced meals. There should be a formal sign off in place that the application has been reviewed and the student’s classification of free or reduced is appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001
Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with eligibility requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $540 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over eligibility determinations for free and reduced meals, we noted there was no formal review control in place for 26 of the 60 applications selected for testing. Additionally, for one of the 60 selections, the student was improperly classified as free when the annual income per the student’s application exceeded the corresponding threshold for that determination. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to review all applications to determine if the student qualifies for free or reduced meals. There should be a formal sign off in place that the application has been reviewed and the student’s classification of free or reduced is appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001
Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with eligibility requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $540 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over eligibility determinations for free and reduced meals, we noted there was no formal review control in place for 26 of the 60 applications selected for testing. Additionally, for one of the 60 selections, the student was improperly classified as free when the annual income per the student’s application exceeded the corresponding threshold for that determination. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to review all applications to determine if the student qualifies for free or reduced meals. There should be a formal sign off in place that the application has been reviewed and the student’s classification of free or reduced is appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001
Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with eligibility requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $540 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over eligibility determinations for free and reduced meals, we noted there was no formal review control in place for 26 of the 60 applications selected for testing. Additionally, for one of the 60 selections, the student was improperly classified as free when the annual income per the student’s application exceeded the corresponding threshold for that determination. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to review all applications to determine if the student qualifies for free or reduced meals. There should be a formal sign off in place that the application has been reviewed and the student’s classification of free or reduced is appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001
Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with eligibility requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $540 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over eligibility determinations for free and reduced meals, we noted there was no formal review control in place for 26 of the 60 applications selected for testing. Additionally, for one of the 60 selections, the student was improperly classified as free when the annual income per the student’s application exceeded the corresponding threshold for that determination. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to review all applications to determine if the student qualifies for free or reduced meals. There should be a formal sign off in place that the application has been reviewed and the student’s classification of free or reduced is appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.