Audit 346837

FY End
2024-09-30
Total Expended
$2.78M
Findings
6
Programs
10
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-19

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
528777 2024-002 Material Weakness - N
528778 2024-002 Material Weakness - N
528779 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - B
1105219 2024-002 Material Weakness - N
1105220 2024-002 Material Weakness - N
1105221 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - B

Contacts

Name Title Type
LF19U9DKFQM6 Al Agpoon Auditee
9165633776 Elaine Reyes Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: PURPOSE OF THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Assistance Listing Number (ALN) numbers are presented for those federal programs for which numbers are available. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Division has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the “Schedule”) is a supplementary schedule to the financial statements of The Salvation Army USA, Western Territory, Del Oro Division (the “Division”), and is presented for the purpose of additional analysis. The Schedule includes the federal grant activity of the Division under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirement of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the activities of the Division, it is not intended to, and does not, present either the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Division.
Title: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Assistance Listing Number (ALN) numbers are presented for those federal programs for which numbers are available. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Division has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Assistance Listing Number (ALN) numbers are presented for those federal programs for which numbers are available. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available.
Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION—FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Assistance Listing Number (ALN) numbers are presented for those federal programs for which numbers are available. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Division has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the national accounting policies of The Salvation Army. These policies are consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Title: INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Assistance Listing Number (ALN) numbers are presented for those federal programs for which numbers are available. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Division has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The Division has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate.
Title: SUB-RECIPIENT Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Assistance Listing Number (ALN) numbers are presented for those federal programs for which numbers are available. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Division has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The Division is the sub-recipient of federal funds, which have been reported as expenditures and listed as federal pass-through fund.
Title: RELATIONSHIP TO FEDERAL AND STATE FINANCIAL REPORTS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Assistance Listing Number (ALN) numbers are presented for those federal programs for which numbers are available. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Division has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The regulations and guidelines governing the preparation of federal and state financial reports vary by state and Federal agency and among programs administered by the same agency. Accordingly, the amounts reported in the federal and state financial reports do not necessarily agree with the amounts reported in the accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, which is prepared as explained in Note 1 above.

Finding Details

Finding 2024-002: Special Tests and Provisions—Accountability for USDA Foods—Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance Federal Program: Emergency Food Assistance Program (Food Commodities)—ALN 10.569 Year(s): 2024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food, and Nutrition Services Contract—D-125, The Salvation Army, Reno Pass-Through Entity: Nevada Department of Agriculture Criteria—Agencies must conduct an annual physical inventory of all storage facilities used by the distributing agency or by a sub distributing agency. Such inventory must be reconciled annually with the storage facility’s inventory records and maintained on file by the agency that contracted with or maintained the storage facility. The Del Oro Reno Division (the Division) is required to submit monthly inventory reports of all The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) USDA donated foods on hand at their own or contracted facility to the Contracted Regional Agency monthly. The report shall indicate for each TEFAP UDSA donated food item: the commodity description, inventory on hand, inventory received for the month, total available for the month, total distributed, total delivered to another agency, inventory adjustments and ending inventory for the month. Condition—We selected 4 of the 12 monthly reports to test the Division’s inventory process. The inventory was counted monthly and submitted to the grantor as required. However, there was no evidence of the review over the count process and the finalized inventory sheets that were submitted to the grantor. Further in the sampled reports, the following findings were noted. Month Selected Finding January 2024- Total cases received per delivery report was 1,192 whereas the total cases recorded in the report was 1,160. The discrepancy of 32 cases was a result of human error. April 2024/ August 2024 -The total cases distributed is calculated as Beginning Cases plus Cases received minus the cases in ending inventory at the end of the month. There was a mathematical error in the above process which led to a discrepancy of 10 cases in the April 2024 report and discrepancy of 26 cases inthe August 2024 report. September 2024 -This report contained inventory items that were donated by other sources and not a part of the Emergency Food Assistance Program. Cause—The lack of review over the inventory process. The inventory count sheets should be reviewed for accuracy and completed by personnel not performing the count. Effect—As a result of a lack of proper review, the Division had discrepancies in the inventory management and tracking process. Recommendation—We recommend the Division implement a review process to ensure the accuracy of the inventory management and reporting process. Views of the Responsible Officials—See Corrective Action Plan
Finding 2024-002: Special Tests and Provisions—Accountability for USDA Foods—Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance Federal Program: Emergency Food Assistance Program (Food Commodities)—ALN 10.569 Year(s): 2024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food, and Nutrition Services Contract—D-125, The Salvation Army, Reno Pass-Through Entity: Nevada Department of Agriculture Criteria—Agencies must conduct an annual physical inventory of all storage facilities used by the distributing agency or by a sub distributing agency. Such inventory must be reconciled annually with the storage facility’s inventory records and maintained on file by the agency that contracted with or maintained the storage facility. The Del Oro Reno Division (the Division) is required to submit monthly inventory reports of all The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) USDA donated foods on hand at their own or contracted facility to the Contracted Regional Agency monthly. The report shall indicate for each TEFAP UDSA donated food item: the commodity description, inventory on hand, inventory received for the month, total available for the month, total distributed, total delivered to another agency, inventory adjustments and ending inventory for the month. Condition—We selected 4 of the 12 monthly reports to test the Division’s inventory process. The inventory was counted monthly and submitted to the grantor as required. However, there was no evidence of the review over the count process and the finalized inventory sheets that were submitted to the grantor. Further in the sampled reports, the following findings were noted. Month Selected Finding January 2024- Total cases received per delivery report was 1,192 whereas the total cases recorded in the report was 1,160. The discrepancy of 32 cases was a result of human error. April 2024/ August 2024 -The total cases distributed is calculated as Beginning Cases plus Cases received minus the cases in ending inventory at the end of the month. There was a mathematical error in the above process which led to a discrepancy of 10 cases in the April 2024 report and discrepancy of 26 cases inthe August 2024 report. September 2024 -This report contained inventory items that were donated by other sources and not a part of the Emergency Food Assistance Program. Cause—The lack of review over the inventory process. The inventory count sheets should be reviewed for accuracy and completed by personnel not performing the count. Effect—As a result of a lack of proper review, the Division had discrepancies in the inventory management and tracking process. Recommendation—We recommend the Division implement a review process to ensure the accuracy of the inventory management and reporting process. Views of the Responsible Officials—See Corrective Action Plan
Finding 2024-003: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles—Payroll Calculation Errors—Significant Deficiency in Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds—ALN 21.027 Year(s): 2024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Contract—DHA SA-01-22/A2 Pass-Through Entity: Sacramento County Criteria—In accordance with 2 CFR 200.430 (g)(1) and (g)(1)(i) charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on accurate records and calculations. Condition/Context—Out of 31 payroll selections, 6 selections had calculation errors. In the process of recording the payroll cost for the grant, spreadsheet related errors were made in transferring the general ledger data into the reimbursement requests which were then used to populate the schedule of federal awards of expenditures. Questions Costs—Under the reportable threshold, hence not applicable Cause—The control to review the recording of the payroll general ledger details into the reimbursement request was not precise enough to identify the calculation errors. Effect—Incorrect cost can be charged to the grant which can lead to the potential disallowance of costs. Recommendation—We recommend the Division implement a more detailed and precise review process to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the reimbursement request. Views of the Responsible Officials—See Corrective Action Plan
Finding 2024-002: Special Tests and Provisions—Accountability for USDA Foods—Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance Federal Program: Emergency Food Assistance Program (Food Commodities)—ALN 10.569 Year(s): 2024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food, and Nutrition Services Contract—D-125, The Salvation Army, Reno Pass-Through Entity: Nevada Department of Agriculture Criteria—Agencies must conduct an annual physical inventory of all storage facilities used by the distributing agency or by a sub distributing agency. Such inventory must be reconciled annually with the storage facility’s inventory records and maintained on file by the agency that contracted with or maintained the storage facility. The Del Oro Reno Division (the Division) is required to submit monthly inventory reports of all The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) USDA donated foods on hand at their own or contracted facility to the Contracted Regional Agency monthly. The report shall indicate for each TEFAP UDSA donated food item: the commodity description, inventory on hand, inventory received for the month, total available for the month, total distributed, total delivered to another agency, inventory adjustments and ending inventory for the month. Condition—We selected 4 of the 12 monthly reports to test the Division’s inventory process. The inventory was counted monthly and submitted to the grantor as required. However, there was no evidence of the review over the count process and the finalized inventory sheets that were submitted to the grantor. Further in the sampled reports, the following findings were noted. Month Selected Finding January 2024- Total cases received per delivery report was 1,192 whereas the total cases recorded in the report was 1,160. The discrepancy of 32 cases was a result of human error. April 2024/ August 2024 -The total cases distributed is calculated as Beginning Cases plus Cases received minus the cases in ending inventory at the end of the month. There was a mathematical error in the above process which led to a discrepancy of 10 cases in the April 2024 report and discrepancy of 26 cases inthe August 2024 report. September 2024 -This report contained inventory items that were donated by other sources and not a part of the Emergency Food Assistance Program. Cause—The lack of review over the inventory process. The inventory count sheets should be reviewed for accuracy and completed by personnel not performing the count. Effect—As a result of a lack of proper review, the Division had discrepancies in the inventory management and tracking process. Recommendation—We recommend the Division implement a review process to ensure the accuracy of the inventory management and reporting process. Views of the Responsible Officials—See Corrective Action Plan
Finding 2024-002: Special Tests and Provisions—Accountability for USDA Foods—Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance Federal Program: Emergency Food Assistance Program (Food Commodities)—ALN 10.569 Year(s): 2024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food, and Nutrition Services Contract—D-125, The Salvation Army, Reno Pass-Through Entity: Nevada Department of Agriculture Criteria—Agencies must conduct an annual physical inventory of all storage facilities used by the distributing agency or by a sub distributing agency. Such inventory must be reconciled annually with the storage facility’s inventory records and maintained on file by the agency that contracted with or maintained the storage facility. The Del Oro Reno Division (the Division) is required to submit monthly inventory reports of all The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) USDA donated foods on hand at their own or contracted facility to the Contracted Regional Agency monthly. The report shall indicate for each TEFAP UDSA donated food item: the commodity description, inventory on hand, inventory received for the month, total available for the month, total distributed, total delivered to another agency, inventory adjustments and ending inventory for the month. Condition—We selected 4 of the 12 monthly reports to test the Division’s inventory process. The inventory was counted monthly and submitted to the grantor as required. However, there was no evidence of the review over the count process and the finalized inventory sheets that were submitted to the grantor. Further in the sampled reports, the following findings were noted. Month Selected Finding January 2024- Total cases received per delivery report was 1,192 whereas the total cases recorded in the report was 1,160. The discrepancy of 32 cases was a result of human error. April 2024/ August 2024 -The total cases distributed is calculated as Beginning Cases plus Cases received minus the cases in ending inventory at the end of the month. There was a mathematical error in the above process which led to a discrepancy of 10 cases in the April 2024 report and discrepancy of 26 cases inthe August 2024 report. September 2024 -This report contained inventory items that were donated by other sources and not a part of the Emergency Food Assistance Program. Cause—The lack of review over the inventory process. The inventory count sheets should be reviewed for accuracy and completed by personnel not performing the count. Effect—As a result of a lack of proper review, the Division had discrepancies in the inventory management and tracking process. Recommendation—We recommend the Division implement a review process to ensure the accuracy of the inventory management and reporting process. Views of the Responsible Officials—See Corrective Action Plan
Finding 2024-003: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles—Payroll Calculation Errors—Significant Deficiency in Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds—ALN 21.027 Year(s): 2024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Contract—DHA SA-01-22/A2 Pass-Through Entity: Sacramento County Criteria—In accordance with 2 CFR 200.430 (g)(1) and (g)(1)(i) charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on accurate records and calculations. Condition/Context—Out of 31 payroll selections, 6 selections had calculation errors. In the process of recording the payroll cost for the grant, spreadsheet related errors were made in transferring the general ledger data into the reimbursement requests which were then used to populate the schedule of federal awards of expenditures. Questions Costs—Under the reportable threshold, hence not applicable Cause—The control to review the recording of the payroll general ledger details into the reimbursement request was not precise enough to identify the calculation errors. Effect—Incorrect cost can be charged to the grant which can lead to the potential disallowance of costs. Recommendation—We recommend the Division implement a more detailed and precise review process to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the reimbursement request. Views of the Responsible Officials—See Corrective Action Plan