Audit 346746

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$88.37M
Findings
4
Programs
26
Organization: Seattle University (WA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-18
Auditor: Kpmg

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
528720 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
528721 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
1105162 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
1105163 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $74.58M Yes 1
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $5.59M Yes 1
84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program_federal Capital Contributions $1.57M Yes 0
93.364 Nursing Student Loans $1.34M Yes 0
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $1.23M Yes 0
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $1.09M Yes 0
84.184 School Safely National Activities $674,702 - 0
93.247 Advanced Nursing Education Workforce Grant Program $315,593 - 0
84.027 Special Education Grants to States $183,833 - 0
93.859 Biomedical Research and Research Training $174,475 Yes 0
93.866 Aging Research $156,441 Yes 0
47.076 Stem Education (formerly Education and Human Resources) $143,733 Yes 0
94.006 Americorps State and National 94.006 $73,955 - 0
93.853 Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences and Neurological Disorders $52,345 Yes 0
47.084 Nsf Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships $32,442 Yes 0
12.063 Basic, Applied, and Advanced Research in Science and Engineering $30,325 Yes 0
81.124 Predictive Science Academic Alliance Program $27,410 Yes 0
47.049 Mathematical and Physical Sciences $24,392 Yes 0
47.007 Engineering Research Project Support $20,179 Yes 0
93.173 Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders $17,266 Yes 0
93.307 Minority Health and Health Disparities Research $13,903 Yes 0
19.401 Academic Exchange Programs - Scholars $9,116 - 0
93.865 Child Health and Human Development Extramural Research $7,908 Yes 0
47.074 Biological Sciences $6,015 Yes 0
84.379 Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants (teach Grants) $3,772 Yes 0
47.041 Engineering $2,390 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
LCYLGVGSEQE3 Joe Cater Auditee
2062208283 Paige Hagen Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Seattle University (the University) and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The University’s audited financial statements are presented on the same basis. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has used its federal negotiated indicrect cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Seattle University (the University) and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The University’s audited financial statements are presented on the same basis.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Seattle University (the University) and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The University’s audited financial statements are presented on the same basis. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has used its federal negotiated indicrect cost rate. The University has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Program Costs/Matching Contributions Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Seattle University (the University) and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The University’s audited financial statements are presented on the same basis. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has used its federal negotiated indicrect cost rate. The amount shown as current year expenditures within the Schedule represents only the federal grant portion of the program costs. Entire program costs, including the University’s matching share, are more than the expenditures shown within the Schedule. Expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Loan Administration Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Seattle University (the University) and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The University’s audited financial statements are presented on the same basis. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has used its federal negotiated indicrect cost rate. The University administers the Federal Perkins Loan and Nursing Student Loan programs. The amounts listed for these loans on the Schedule include any loans made during the fiscal year plus the balance of loans from previous years for which the federal government imposes continuing compliance requirements, plus any interest subsidy, cash, or administrative cost allowances received. The table below provides the balance at the end of the current fiscal year and current year lending activity: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table (b) During the year ended June 30, 2024, the University authorized for processing the following amounts of new loans under the Federal Direct Loan Program, which includes Stafford Loans and Parents’ Loans for Undergraduate Students: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table

Finding Details

Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria Per 34 CFR 668, Institutions must report student disbursement data within 15 calendar days after the institution makes a disbursement or becomes aware of the need to make an adjustment to previously reported student disbursement data or expected student disbursement data. Institutions may do this by reporting once every 15 calendar days, bi-weekly or weekly, or may set up their own system to ensure that changes are reported in a timely manner. In addition, CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‑Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition Found The University did not have controls appropriately designed to ensure timely reporting of disbursements to the Department of Education Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) system. Specifically, during our testing, we selected a sample of 40 students to recalculate the days between disbursements and the reporting of disbursements to COD. Three of our selections (two graduate students and one undergraduate student) were not submitted within the required 15-day window. These students were part of a population that the University attempted to submit to COD timely but, due to system errors, that submission was not transmitted. The University later discovered this and resubmitted the information 4 days after the due date. The University’s controls were not designed to ensure those errors were resolved timely. Cause and Effect The University did not design its controls to ensure error reports with the COD were resolved on a timely basis to ensure disbursements were reported on a timely basis. Each of the errors were resolved and information was ultimately reported to the COD, however, not within the 15-day window. Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding in the immediately prior audit. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend the University improve related control to ensure disbursements are reported to the Department of Education within the 15-day requirement. Views of Responsible Officials The University agrees with the condition reported. The responsible department did initiate the student report transmittal to the COD, however a system error prevented it from reaching the COD. The University updated its control processes to ensure the COD confirms receipt of the student report transmittals to mitigate such errors for future reporting.
Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria Per 34 CFR 668, Institutions must report student disbursement data within 15 calendar days after the institution makes a disbursement or becomes aware of the need to make an adjustment to previously reported student disbursement data or expected student disbursement data. Institutions may do this by reporting once every 15 calendar days, bi-weekly or weekly, or may set up their own system to ensure that changes are reported in a timely manner. In addition, CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‑Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition Found The University did not have controls appropriately designed to ensure timely reporting of disbursements to the Department of Education Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) system. Specifically, during our testing, we selected a sample of 40 students to recalculate the days between disbursements and the reporting of disbursements to COD. Three of our selections (two graduate students and one undergraduate student) were not submitted within the required 15-day window. These students were part of a population that the University attempted to submit to COD timely but, due to system errors, that submission was not transmitted. The University later discovered this and resubmitted the information 4 days after the due date. The University’s controls were not designed to ensure those errors were resolved timely. Cause and Effect The University did not design its controls to ensure error reports with the COD were resolved on a timely basis to ensure disbursements were reported on a timely basis. Each of the errors were resolved and information was ultimately reported to the COD, however, not within the 15-day window. Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding in the immediately prior audit. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend the University improve related control to ensure disbursements are reported to the Department of Education within the 15-day requirement. Views of Responsible Officials The University agrees with the condition reported. The responsible department did initiate the student report transmittal to the COD, however a system error prevented it from reaching the COD. The University updated its control processes to ensure the COD confirms receipt of the student report transmittals to mitigate such errors for future reporting.
Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria Per 34 CFR 668, Institutions must report student disbursement data within 15 calendar days after the institution makes a disbursement or becomes aware of the need to make an adjustment to previously reported student disbursement data or expected student disbursement data. Institutions may do this by reporting once every 15 calendar days, bi-weekly or weekly, or may set up their own system to ensure that changes are reported in a timely manner. In addition, CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‑Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition Found The University did not have controls appropriately designed to ensure timely reporting of disbursements to the Department of Education Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) system. Specifically, during our testing, we selected a sample of 40 students to recalculate the days between disbursements and the reporting of disbursements to COD. Three of our selections (two graduate students and one undergraduate student) were not submitted within the required 15-day window. These students were part of a population that the University attempted to submit to COD timely but, due to system errors, that submission was not transmitted. The University later discovered this and resubmitted the information 4 days after the due date. The University’s controls were not designed to ensure those errors were resolved timely. Cause and Effect The University did not design its controls to ensure error reports with the COD were resolved on a timely basis to ensure disbursements were reported on a timely basis. Each of the errors were resolved and information was ultimately reported to the COD, however, not within the 15-day window. Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding in the immediately prior audit. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend the University improve related control to ensure disbursements are reported to the Department of Education within the 15-day requirement. Views of Responsible Officials The University agrees with the condition reported. The responsible department did initiate the student report transmittal to the COD, however a system error prevented it from reaching the COD. The University updated its control processes to ensure the COD confirms receipt of the student report transmittals to mitigate such errors for future reporting.
Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria Per 34 CFR 668, Institutions must report student disbursement data within 15 calendar days after the institution makes a disbursement or becomes aware of the need to make an adjustment to previously reported student disbursement data or expected student disbursement data. Institutions may do this by reporting once every 15 calendar days, bi-weekly or weekly, or may set up their own system to ensure that changes are reported in a timely manner. In addition, CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‑Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition Found The University did not have controls appropriately designed to ensure timely reporting of disbursements to the Department of Education Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) system. Specifically, during our testing, we selected a sample of 40 students to recalculate the days between disbursements and the reporting of disbursements to COD. Three of our selections (two graduate students and one undergraduate student) were not submitted within the required 15-day window. These students were part of a population that the University attempted to submit to COD timely but, due to system errors, that submission was not transmitted. The University later discovered this and resubmitted the information 4 days after the due date. The University’s controls were not designed to ensure those errors were resolved timely. Cause and Effect The University did not design its controls to ensure error reports with the COD were resolved on a timely basis to ensure disbursements were reported on a timely basis. Each of the errors were resolved and information was ultimately reported to the COD, however, not within the 15-day window. Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding in the immediately prior audit. Statistical Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend the University improve related control to ensure disbursements are reported to the Department of Education within the 15-day requirement. Views of Responsible Officials The University agrees with the condition reported. The responsible department did initiate the student report transmittal to the COD, however a system error prevented it from reaching the COD. The University updated its control processes to ensure the COD confirms receipt of the student report transmittals to mitigate such errors for future reporting.