Audit 346667

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$4.69M
Findings
6
Programs
8
Organization: Marin Community Clinics, Inc. (CA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-18

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
528658 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes N
528659 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes N
528660 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1105100 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1105101 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1105102 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes N

Contacts

Name Title Type
K9BPKJN51NB1 Bharatha Naotunne Auditee
4157983107 Scott Gold Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimus cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of Marin Community Clinics, Inc. under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Marin Community Clinics, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, results of operations, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Marin Community Clinics, Inc.
Title: Note 3: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimus cost rate. Marin Community Clinics, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Note 4: Federal Loan Programs Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimus cost rate. Marin Community Clinics, Inc. did not have any federal loan programs during the year ended June 30, 2024.
Title: Note 5: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (Unaudited) Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimus cost rate. Marin Community Clinics, Inc. did not receive donated Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) from a federal source during the year ended June 30, 2024.

Finding Details

Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned cost – None Context – A sample of 40 encounters were tested out of the total population of 220,121 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Six patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation Effect – Sliding fee balances of the patients were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Yes. Finding 2023-001. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to train personnel and ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned cost – None Context – A sample of 40 encounters were tested out of the total population of 220,121 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Six patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation Effect – Sliding fee balances of the patients were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Yes. Finding 2023-001. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to train personnel and ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned cost – None Context – A sample of 40 encounters were tested out of the total population of 220,121 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Six patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation Effect – Sliding fee balances of the patients were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Yes. Finding 2023-001. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to train personnel and ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned cost – None Context – A sample of 40 encounters were tested out of the total population of 220,121 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Six patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation Effect – Sliding fee balances of the patients were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Yes. Finding 2023-001. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to train personnel and ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned cost – None Context – A sample of 40 encounters were tested out of the total population of 220,121 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Six patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation Effect – Sliding fee balances of the patients were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Yes. Finding 2023-001. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to train personnel and ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned cost – None Context – A sample of 40 encounters were tested out of the total population of 220,121 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Six patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation Effect – Sliding fee balances of the patients were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Yes. Finding 2023-001. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to train personnel and ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.