Audit 34631

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$1.70M
Findings
4
Programs
3
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
30965 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - B
30966 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - B
607407 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - B
607408 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
47.070 Computer and Information Science and Engineering $149,844 Yes 0
43.001 Science $19,182 Yes 0
47.049 Mathematical and Physical Sciences $4,359 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
GKNXAU6D3629 Cecelia Fort Auditee
8058801608 Laura Copple Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Basis of Accounting: Expenditures reported on this schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Recognition of MSIP Revenue: The Organization amortizes the total award over the period of performance, recognizing revenue for each month in which telescope time was allocated to approved projects under NSF award AST-2034337 (the MSIP award). Reimbursement for the hours for each completed month are requested in the following month. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-005: Review and Reconciliation of Award Tracking Schedules Federal Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Pass Through Entity: Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number and Title: 43.001 - Science Award Numbers / Years: 80NSSC19K0291, 80NSSC22K0701 - 2022 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance; Noncompliance Criteria: Expenditures charged to federal awards must be allowable costs in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition and Context: The Organization maintains an excel workbook for each federal award which calculates the amount to be charged to the applicable award for allowable expenditures incurred. For two awards the tracking schedule was found to contain minor errors related to information that was manually entered into the worksheets. For the portion of the year that these errors occurred there was a process to have the worksheets reviewed by an employee who did not prepare them, however this review did not include a reconciliation to the general ledger and failed to catch the errors. It was further noted that this review was not being performed for a portion of the year due to staff turnover. Cause: The review procedures performed were not detailed enough to catch the noted errors. Effect: One award was overcharged by $229 which will be adjusted on a subsequent invoice. Questioned Costs: None to report. Recommendation: We recommend that a designated individual be trained to review and reconcile these worksheets to the general ledger monthly before charging federal awards, and that the review be sufficiently detailed to catch manual entry and formula errors. Views of Responsible Officials: Refer to management?s corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-005: Review and Reconciliation of Award Tracking Schedules Federal Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Pass Through Entity: Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number and Title: 43.001 - Science Award Numbers / Years: 80NSSC19K0291, 80NSSC22K0701 - 2022 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance; Noncompliance Criteria: Expenditures charged to federal awards must be allowable costs in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition and Context: The Organization maintains an excel workbook for each federal award which calculates the amount to be charged to the applicable award for allowable expenditures incurred. For two awards the tracking schedule was found to contain minor errors related to information that was manually entered into the worksheets. For the portion of the year that these errors occurred there was a process to have the worksheets reviewed by an employee who did not prepare them, however this review did not include a reconciliation to the general ledger and failed to catch the errors. It was further noted that this review was not being performed for a portion of the year due to staff turnover. Cause: The review procedures performed were not detailed enough to catch the noted errors. Effect: One award was overcharged by $229 which will be adjusted on a subsequent invoice. Questioned Costs: None to report. Recommendation: We recommend that a designated individual be trained to review and reconcile these worksheets to the general ledger monthly before charging federal awards, and that the review be sufficiently detailed to catch manual entry and formula errors. Views of Responsible Officials: Refer to management?s corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-005: Review and Reconciliation of Award Tracking Schedules Federal Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Pass Through Entity: Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number and Title: 43.001 - Science Award Numbers / Years: 80NSSC19K0291, 80NSSC22K0701 - 2022 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance; Noncompliance Criteria: Expenditures charged to federal awards must be allowable costs in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition and Context: The Organization maintains an excel workbook for each federal award which calculates the amount to be charged to the applicable award for allowable expenditures incurred. For two awards the tracking schedule was found to contain minor errors related to information that was manually entered into the worksheets. For the portion of the year that these errors occurred there was a process to have the worksheets reviewed by an employee who did not prepare them, however this review did not include a reconciliation to the general ledger and failed to catch the errors. It was further noted that this review was not being performed for a portion of the year due to staff turnover. Cause: The review procedures performed were not detailed enough to catch the noted errors. Effect: One award was overcharged by $229 which will be adjusted on a subsequent invoice. Questioned Costs: None to report. Recommendation: We recommend that a designated individual be trained to review and reconcile these worksheets to the general ledger monthly before charging federal awards, and that the review be sufficiently detailed to catch manual entry and formula errors. Views of Responsible Officials: Refer to management?s corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-005: Review and Reconciliation of Award Tracking Schedules Federal Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Pass Through Entity: Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number and Title: 43.001 - Science Award Numbers / Years: 80NSSC19K0291, 80NSSC22K0701 - 2022 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance; Noncompliance Criteria: Expenditures charged to federal awards must be allowable costs in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition and Context: The Organization maintains an excel workbook for each federal award which calculates the amount to be charged to the applicable award for allowable expenditures incurred. For two awards the tracking schedule was found to contain minor errors related to information that was manually entered into the worksheets. For the portion of the year that these errors occurred there was a process to have the worksheets reviewed by an employee who did not prepare them, however this review did not include a reconciliation to the general ledger and failed to catch the errors. It was further noted that this review was not being performed for a portion of the year due to staff turnover. Cause: The review procedures performed were not detailed enough to catch the noted errors. Effect: One award was overcharged by $229 which will be adjusted on a subsequent invoice. Questioned Costs: None to report. Recommendation: We recommend that a designated individual be trained to review and reconcile these worksheets to the general ledger monthly before charging federal awards, and that the review be sufficiently detailed to catch manual entry and formula errors. Views of Responsible Officials: Refer to management?s corrective action plan.