Audit 346243

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$3.32M
Findings
12
Programs
6
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-14
Auditor: Jones & Roth PC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
528184 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
528185 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
528186 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
528187 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
528188 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
528189 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
1104626 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
1104627 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
1104628 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
1104629 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
1104630 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
1104631 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
17.278 Wioa Dislocated Worker Formula Grants $99,436 - 0
17.258 Wioa Adult Program $51,498 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $16,046 Yes 1
17.270 Reentry Employment Opportunities $13,168 - 0
17.277 Wioa National Dislocated Worker Grants / Wia National Emergency Grants $9,320 - 0
17.259 Wioa Youth Activities $8,316 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
GVT5MRAUZNB2 Laura Kropf Auditee
5036576644 Nadia Costa Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance. The Uniform Guidance establishes criteria to be used in defining major programs. Major programs are those programs selected for testing using a risk-assessment model, as well as certain minimum expenditure requirements, as outlined in the Uniform Guidance Subpart F 200.518. Programs with similar requirements may be grouped into a cluster for testing purposes. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: CWP has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of CWP under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Grants are organized by federal department or agency and identified by the 2024 Assistance Listing Number (ALN).
Title: Insurance Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance. The Uniform Guidance establishes criteria to be used in defining major programs. Major programs are those programs selected for testing using a risk-assessment model, as well as certain minimum expenditure requirements, as outlined in the Uniform Guidance Subpart F 200.518. Programs with similar requirements may be grouped into a cluster for testing purposes. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: CWP has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. CWP had insurance in force during the year ended June 30, 2024, as recommended by its insurance agent.

Finding Details

Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and immaterial noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, subpart E), it is the responsibility of CWP’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order for payroll costs to be properly allocated to federal awards based on records reflecting the actual work performed. Condition: While performing audit procedures over payroll disbursements, we identified three separate instances where the allocation of an employee’s hours by grant in the monthly timesheet distribution spreadsheet was not consistent with the actual time charged to the respective grants as reflected in the employee’s approved timesheet for the pay period. As a result, the payroll allocation journal entries recorded for those months was not consistent with the actual work performed for each grant. Cause of Condition: Internal controls in place are not adequately designed and implemented to ensure payroll allocation journal entries are determined based on actual hours worked on the employees’ timesheets for the respective pay periods. Effect of Condition: The effect of the condition is that payroll costs were not properly allocated to federal awards based on actual work performed for such award. Questioned Costs: No reportable questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management revise procedures surrounding monthly payroll allocation calculations to ensure employee hours by grant are accurately reflected in the timesheet distribution spreadsheet utilized for recording payroll related journal entries. We recommend implementing procedures whereby the allocation calculations are reviewed for consistency with employee timesheets by someone other than the individual who prepares them. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with auditor’s finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and immaterial noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, subpart E), it is the responsibility of CWP’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order for payroll costs to be properly allocated to federal awards based on records reflecting the actual work performed. Condition: While performing audit procedures over payroll disbursements, we identified three separate instances where the allocation of an employee’s hours by grant in the monthly timesheet distribution spreadsheet was not consistent with the actual time charged to the respective grants as reflected in the employee’s approved timesheet for the pay period. As a result, the payroll allocation journal entries recorded for those months was not consistent with the actual work performed for each grant. Cause of Condition: Internal controls in place are not adequately designed and implemented to ensure payroll allocation journal entries are determined based on actual hours worked on the employees’ timesheets for the respective pay periods. Effect of Condition: The effect of the condition is that payroll costs were not properly allocated to federal awards based on actual work performed for such award. Questioned Costs: No reportable questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management revise procedures surrounding monthly payroll allocation calculations to ensure employee hours by grant are accurately reflected in the timesheet distribution spreadsheet utilized for recording payroll related journal entries. We recommend implementing procedures whereby the allocation calculations are reviewed for consistency with employee timesheets by someone other than the individual who prepares them. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with auditor’s finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and immaterial noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, subpart E), it is the responsibility of CWP’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order for payroll costs to be properly allocated to federal awards based on records reflecting the actual work performed. Condition: While performing audit procedures over payroll disbursements, we identified three separate instances where the allocation of an employee’s hours by grant in the monthly timesheet distribution spreadsheet was not consistent with the actual time charged to the respective grants as reflected in the employee’s approved timesheet for the pay period. As a result, the payroll allocation journal entries recorded for those months was not consistent with the actual work performed for each grant. Cause of Condition: Internal controls in place are not adequately designed and implemented to ensure payroll allocation journal entries are determined based on actual hours worked on the employees’ timesheets for the respective pay periods. Effect of Condition: The effect of the condition is that payroll costs were not properly allocated to federal awards based on actual work performed for such award. Questioned Costs: No reportable questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management revise procedures surrounding monthly payroll allocation calculations to ensure employee hours by grant are accurately reflected in the timesheet distribution spreadsheet utilized for recording payroll related journal entries. We recommend implementing procedures whereby the allocation calculations are reviewed for consistency with employee timesheets by someone other than the individual who prepares them. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with auditor’s finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and immaterial noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, subpart E), it is the responsibility of CWP’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order for payroll costs to be properly allocated to federal awards based on records reflecting the actual work performed. Condition: While performing audit procedures over payroll disbursements, we identified three separate instances where the allocation of an employee’s hours by grant in the monthly timesheet distribution spreadsheet was not consistent with the actual time charged to the respective grants as reflected in the employee’s approved timesheet for the pay period. As a result, the payroll allocation journal entries recorded for those months was not consistent with the actual work performed for each grant. Cause of Condition: Internal controls in place are not adequately designed and implemented to ensure payroll allocation journal entries are determined based on actual hours worked on the employees’ timesheets for the respective pay periods. Effect of Condition: The effect of the condition is that payroll costs were not properly allocated to federal awards based on actual work performed for such award. Questioned Costs: No reportable questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management revise procedures surrounding monthly payroll allocation calculations to ensure employee hours by grant are accurately reflected in the timesheet distribution spreadsheet utilized for recording payroll related journal entries. We recommend implementing procedures whereby the allocation calculations are reviewed for consistency with employee timesheets by someone other than the individual who prepares them. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with auditor’s finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and immaterial noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, subpart E), it is the responsibility of CWP’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order for payroll costs to be properly allocated to federal awards based on records reflecting the actual work performed. Condition: While performing audit procedures over payroll disbursements, we identified three separate instances where the allocation of an employee’s hours by grant in the monthly timesheet distribution spreadsheet was not consistent with the actual time charged to the respective grants as reflected in the employee’s approved timesheet for the pay period. As a result, the payroll allocation journal entries recorded for those months was not consistent with the actual work performed for each grant. Cause of Condition: Internal controls in place are not adequately designed and implemented to ensure payroll allocation journal entries are determined based on actual hours worked on the employees’ timesheets for the respective pay periods. Effect of Condition: The effect of the condition is that payroll costs were not properly allocated to federal awards based on actual work performed for such award. Questioned Costs: No reportable questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management revise procedures surrounding monthly payroll allocation calculations to ensure employee hours by grant are accurately reflected in the timesheet distribution spreadsheet utilized for recording payroll related journal entries. We recommend implementing procedures whereby the allocation calculations are reviewed for consistency with employee timesheets by someone other than the individual who prepares them. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with auditor’s finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and immaterial noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, subpart E), it is the responsibility of CWP’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order for payroll costs to be properly allocated to federal awards based on records reflecting the actual work performed. Condition: While performing audit procedures over payroll disbursements, we identified three separate instances where the allocation of an employee’s hours by grant in the monthly timesheet distribution spreadsheet was not consistent with the actual time charged to the respective grants as reflected in the employee’s approved timesheet for the pay period. As a result, the payroll allocation journal entries recorded for those months was not consistent with the actual work performed for each grant. Cause of Condition: Internal controls in place are not adequately designed and implemented to ensure payroll allocation journal entries are determined based on actual hours worked on the employees’ timesheets for the respective pay periods. Effect of Condition: The effect of the condition is that payroll costs were not properly allocated to federal awards based on actual work performed for such award. Questioned Costs: No reportable questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management revise procedures surrounding monthly payroll allocation calculations to ensure employee hours by grant are accurately reflected in the timesheet distribution spreadsheet utilized for recording payroll related journal entries. We recommend implementing procedures whereby the allocation calculations are reviewed for consistency with employee timesheets by someone other than the individual who prepares them. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with auditor’s finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and immaterial noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, subpart E), it is the responsibility of CWP’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order for payroll costs to be properly allocated to federal awards based on records reflecting the actual work performed. Condition: While performing audit procedures over payroll disbursements, we identified three separate instances where the allocation of an employee’s hours by grant in the monthly timesheet distribution spreadsheet was not consistent with the actual time charged to the respective grants as reflected in the employee’s approved timesheet for the pay period. As a result, the payroll allocation journal entries recorded for those months was not consistent with the actual work performed for each grant. Cause of Condition: Internal controls in place are not adequately designed and implemented to ensure payroll allocation journal entries are determined based on actual hours worked on the employees’ timesheets for the respective pay periods. Effect of Condition: The effect of the condition is that payroll costs were not properly allocated to federal awards based on actual work performed for such award. Questioned Costs: No reportable questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management revise procedures surrounding monthly payroll allocation calculations to ensure employee hours by grant are accurately reflected in the timesheet distribution spreadsheet utilized for recording payroll related journal entries. We recommend implementing procedures whereby the allocation calculations are reviewed for consistency with employee timesheets by someone other than the individual who prepares them. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with auditor’s finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and immaterial noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, subpart E), it is the responsibility of CWP’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order for payroll costs to be properly allocated to federal awards based on records reflecting the actual work performed. Condition: While performing audit procedures over payroll disbursements, we identified three separate instances where the allocation of an employee’s hours by grant in the monthly timesheet distribution spreadsheet was not consistent with the actual time charged to the respective grants as reflected in the employee’s approved timesheet for the pay period. As a result, the payroll allocation journal entries recorded for those months was not consistent with the actual work performed for each grant. Cause of Condition: Internal controls in place are not adequately designed and implemented to ensure payroll allocation journal entries are determined based on actual hours worked on the employees’ timesheets for the respective pay periods. Effect of Condition: The effect of the condition is that payroll costs were not properly allocated to federal awards based on actual work performed for such award. Questioned Costs: No reportable questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management revise procedures surrounding monthly payroll allocation calculations to ensure employee hours by grant are accurately reflected in the timesheet distribution spreadsheet utilized for recording payroll related journal entries. We recommend implementing procedures whereby the allocation calculations are reviewed for consistency with employee timesheets by someone other than the individual who prepares them. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with auditor’s finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and immaterial noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, subpart E), it is the responsibility of CWP’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order for payroll costs to be properly allocated to federal awards based on records reflecting the actual work performed. Condition: While performing audit procedures over payroll disbursements, we identified three separate instances where the allocation of an employee’s hours by grant in the monthly timesheet distribution spreadsheet was not consistent with the actual time charged to the respective grants as reflected in the employee’s approved timesheet for the pay period. As a result, the payroll allocation journal entries recorded for those months was not consistent with the actual work performed for each grant. Cause of Condition: Internal controls in place are not adequately designed and implemented to ensure payroll allocation journal entries are determined based on actual hours worked on the employees’ timesheets for the respective pay periods. Effect of Condition: The effect of the condition is that payroll costs were not properly allocated to federal awards based on actual work performed for such award. Questioned Costs: No reportable questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management revise procedures surrounding monthly payroll allocation calculations to ensure employee hours by grant are accurately reflected in the timesheet distribution spreadsheet utilized for recording payroll related journal entries. We recommend implementing procedures whereby the allocation calculations are reviewed for consistency with employee timesheets by someone other than the individual who prepares them. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with auditor’s finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and immaterial noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, subpart E), it is the responsibility of CWP’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order for payroll costs to be properly allocated to federal awards based on records reflecting the actual work performed. Condition: While performing audit procedures over payroll disbursements, we identified three separate instances where the allocation of an employee’s hours by grant in the monthly timesheet distribution spreadsheet was not consistent with the actual time charged to the respective grants as reflected in the employee’s approved timesheet for the pay period. As a result, the payroll allocation journal entries recorded for those months was not consistent with the actual work performed for each grant. Cause of Condition: Internal controls in place are not adequately designed and implemented to ensure payroll allocation journal entries are determined based on actual hours worked on the employees’ timesheets for the respective pay periods. Effect of Condition: The effect of the condition is that payroll costs were not properly allocated to federal awards based on actual work performed for such award. Questioned Costs: No reportable questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management revise procedures surrounding monthly payroll allocation calculations to ensure employee hours by grant are accurately reflected in the timesheet distribution spreadsheet utilized for recording payroll related journal entries. We recommend implementing procedures whereby the allocation calculations are reviewed for consistency with employee timesheets by someone other than the individual who prepares them. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with auditor’s finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and immaterial noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, subpart E), it is the responsibility of CWP’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order for payroll costs to be properly allocated to federal awards based on records reflecting the actual work performed. Condition: While performing audit procedures over payroll disbursements, we identified three separate instances where the allocation of an employee’s hours by grant in the monthly timesheet distribution spreadsheet was not consistent with the actual time charged to the respective grants as reflected in the employee’s approved timesheet for the pay period. As a result, the payroll allocation journal entries recorded for those months was not consistent with the actual work performed for each grant. Cause of Condition: Internal controls in place are not adequately designed and implemented to ensure payroll allocation journal entries are determined based on actual hours worked on the employees’ timesheets for the respective pay periods. Effect of Condition: The effect of the condition is that payroll costs were not properly allocated to federal awards based on actual work performed for such award. Questioned Costs: No reportable questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management revise procedures surrounding monthly payroll allocation calculations to ensure employee hours by grant are accurately reflected in the timesheet distribution spreadsheet utilized for recording payroll related journal entries. We recommend implementing procedures whereby the allocation calculations are reviewed for consistency with employee timesheets by someone other than the individual who prepares them. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with auditor’s finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance and immaterial noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, subpart E), it is the responsibility of CWP’s management to ensure internal controls are properly designed and implemented in order for payroll costs to be properly allocated to federal awards based on records reflecting the actual work performed. Condition: While performing audit procedures over payroll disbursements, we identified three separate instances where the allocation of an employee’s hours by grant in the monthly timesheet distribution spreadsheet was not consistent with the actual time charged to the respective grants as reflected in the employee’s approved timesheet for the pay period. As a result, the payroll allocation journal entries recorded for those months was not consistent with the actual work performed for each grant. Cause of Condition: Internal controls in place are not adequately designed and implemented to ensure payroll allocation journal entries are determined based on actual hours worked on the employees’ timesheets for the respective pay periods. Effect of Condition: The effect of the condition is that payroll costs were not properly allocated to federal awards based on actual work performed for such award. Questioned Costs: No reportable questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management revise procedures surrounding monthly payroll allocation calculations to ensure employee hours by grant are accurately reflected in the timesheet distribution spreadsheet utilized for recording payroll related journal entries. We recommend implementing procedures whereby the allocation calculations are reviewed for consistency with employee timesheets by someone other than the individual who prepares them. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with auditor’s finding. See attached corrective action plan.