2024-002 Description
Criteria "The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re‐inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)).
Additionally, for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA‐approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family‐caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404)."
Condition During the audit, a sample of 40 HQS failed inspections were reviewed for MTW, and 11 HQS failed inspections were reviewed for the Housing Choice Voucher/Mainstream program. Of these reviewed inspections, 5 of the MTW and 5 of the HCV/Mainstream were not properly re-inspected, and no voucher abatement steps were taken to enforce compliance.
Context situation the condition or situation that exists that gives rise to the audit finding. describes the work performed that resulted in the finding and provides sufficient information for judging the prevalence and consequences of the finding, such as the relation to the population or universe of costs or the number of cases examined as well as quantification of audit findings in dollars.
Cause Controls over compliance associated with HQS inspections are inadequate.
Effect The absence of voucher abatement steps and the failure to enforce compliance through potential voucher loss may result in noncompliance with federal program requirements and potential financial implications
Recommendations We suggest the Authority properly oversee compliance with regulations and enforce rent abatements if necessary to adherence to federal compliance requirements.
Management Views Management Agrees
2024-002 Description
Criteria "The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re‐inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)).
Additionally, for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA‐approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family‐caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404)."
Condition During the audit, a sample of 40 HQS failed inspections were reviewed for MTW, and 11 HQS failed inspections were reviewed for the Housing Choice Voucher/Mainstream program. Of these reviewed inspections, 5 of the MTW and 5 of the HCV/Mainstream were not properly re-inspected, and no voucher abatement steps were taken to enforce compliance.
Context situation the condition or situation that exists that gives rise to the audit finding. describes the work performed that resulted in the finding and provides sufficient information for judging the prevalence and consequences of the finding, such as the relation to the population or universe of costs or the number of cases examined as well as quantification of audit findings in dollars.
Cause Controls over compliance associated with HQS inspections are inadequate.
Effect The absence of voucher abatement steps and the failure to enforce compliance through potential voucher loss may result in noncompliance with federal program requirements and potential financial implications
Recommendations We suggest the Authority properly oversee compliance with regulations and enforce rent abatements if necessary to adherence to federal compliance requirements.
Management Views Management Agrees
2024-002 Description
Criteria "The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re‐inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)).
Additionally, for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA‐approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family‐caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404)."
Condition During the audit, a sample of 40 HQS failed inspections were reviewed for MTW, and 11 HQS failed inspections were reviewed for the Housing Choice Voucher/Mainstream program. Of these reviewed inspections, 5 of the MTW and 5 of the HCV/Mainstream were not properly re-inspected, and no voucher abatement steps were taken to enforce compliance.
Context situation the condition or situation that exists that gives rise to the audit finding. describes the work performed that resulted in the finding and provides sufficient information for judging the prevalence and consequences of the finding, such as the relation to the population or universe of costs or the number of cases examined as well as quantification of audit findings in dollars.
Cause Controls over compliance associated with HQS inspections are inadequate.
Effect The absence of voucher abatement steps and the failure to enforce compliance through potential voucher loss may result in noncompliance with federal program requirements and potential financial implications
Recommendations We suggest the Authority properly oversee compliance with regulations and enforce rent abatements if necessary to adherence to federal compliance requirements.
Management Views Management Agrees
2024-002 Description
Criteria "The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re‐inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)).
Additionally, for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA‐approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family‐caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404)."
Condition During the audit, a sample of 40 HQS failed inspections were reviewed for MTW, and 11 HQS failed inspections were reviewed for the Housing Choice Voucher/Mainstream program. Of these reviewed inspections, 5 of the MTW and 5 of the HCV/Mainstream were not properly re-inspected, and no voucher abatement steps were taken to enforce compliance.
Context situation the condition or situation that exists that gives rise to the audit finding. describes the work performed that resulted in the finding and provides sufficient information for judging the prevalence and consequences of the finding, such as the relation to the population or universe of costs or the number of cases examined as well as quantification of audit findings in dollars.
Cause Controls over compliance associated with HQS inspections are inadequate.
Effect The absence of voucher abatement steps and the failure to enforce compliance through potential voucher loss may result in noncompliance with federal program requirements and potential financial implications
Recommendations We suggest the Authority properly oversee compliance with regulations and enforce rent abatements if necessary to adherence to federal compliance requirements.
Management Views Management Agrees
2024-002 Description
Criteria "The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re‐inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)).
Additionally, for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA‐approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family‐caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404)."
Condition During the audit, a sample of 40 HQS failed inspections were reviewed for MTW, and 11 HQS failed inspections were reviewed for the Housing Choice Voucher/Mainstream program. Of these reviewed inspections, 5 of the MTW and 5 of the HCV/Mainstream were not properly re-inspected, and no voucher abatement steps were taken to enforce compliance.
Context situation the condition or situation that exists that gives rise to the audit finding. describes the work performed that resulted in the finding and provides sufficient information for judging the prevalence and consequences of the finding, such as the relation to the population or universe of costs or the number of cases examined as well as quantification of audit findings in dollars.
Cause Controls over compliance associated with HQS inspections are inadequate.
Effect The absence of voucher abatement steps and the failure to enforce compliance through potential voucher loss may result in noncompliance with federal program requirements and potential financial implications
Recommendations We suggest the Authority properly oversee compliance with regulations and enforce rent abatements if necessary to adherence to federal compliance requirements.
Management Views Management Agrees
2024-002 Description
Criteria "The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re‐inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)).
Additionally, for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA‐approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family‐caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404)."
Condition During the audit, a sample of 40 HQS failed inspections were reviewed for MTW, and 11 HQS failed inspections were reviewed for the Housing Choice Voucher/Mainstream program. Of these reviewed inspections, 5 of the MTW and 5 of the HCV/Mainstream were not properly re-inspected, and no voucher abatement steps were taken to enforce compliance.
Context situation the condition or situation that exists that gives rise to the audit finding. describes the work performed that resulted in the finding and provides sufficient information for judging the prevalence and consequences of the finding, such as the relation to the population or universe of costs or the number of cases examined as well as quantification of audit findings in dollars.
Cause Controls over compliance associated with HQS inspections are inadequate.
Effect The absence of voucher abatement steps and the failure to enforce compliance through potential voucher loss may result in noncompliance with federal program requirements and potential financial implications
Recommendations We suggest the Authority properly oversee compliance with regulations and enforce rent abatements if necessary to adherence to federal compliance requirements.
Management Views Management Agrees