Audit 345374

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$25.69M
Findings
10
Programs
8
Organization: Upper Iowa University (IA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-10

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
526428 2024-001 - Yes N
526429 2024-001 - Yes N
526430 2024-001 - Yes N
526431 2024-001 - Yes N
526432 2024-001 - Yes N
1102870 2024-001 - Yes N
1102871 2024-001 - Yes N
1102872 2024-001 - Yes N
1102873 2024-001 - Yes N
1102874 2024-001 - Yes N

Contacts

Name Title Type
RC6QXW77MA38 Stacie Burington Auditee
8005534150 Nicki Donlon Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: 1. Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual or modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Upper Iowa University under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the University.
Title: 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual or modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual or modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: 3. Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual or modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The University has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding 2024-001: Special Tests and Provisions – Gramm-Leach Bliley Act Repeat of finding 2023-001 Federal Program - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number - 84.033, 84.268, 84.063, 84.379, 84.007 Federal Award Number - Various Federal Award Year - June 30, 2024 Criteria: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. No. 106-102) (GLBA) requires institutions to explain their information-sharing practices to their customers and to safeguard sensitive data (16 CFR 314). In 2021, the Federal Trade Commission issued final regulations that altered the current required elements of an information security program and added several new elements. Under the regulations, institutions are required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that is written in one or more readily accessible parts. The written information security program for institutions must address all elements that apply. The elements for the information security programs set forth in this section 16 CFR 314.4 are high-level principles that set forth basic issues the programs must address, and do not prescribe how they will be addressed. Condition: The University does not have a written information security program that addresses all elements that apply. Cause: The University did not have procedures and processes in place specific to GLBA and therefore, did not have written documentation of all required elements. Effect: Failure to comply with the requirements of GLBA standards puts the University at risk of compromising consumer, nonpublic personal information. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Recommendation: The University should perform and document an annual risk assessment to determine the University's specific risks relevant to protecting consumer nonpublic personal information. At a minimum, the University should address each of the required minimum elements noted in the GLBA regulations (16 CFR 314.4). Management's Response: The reported issue arises from the absence of written documentation outlining policies and procedures related to GLBA requirements. This matter is being addressed by the Director of Information Technology in collaboration with a campus-wide committee responsible for overseeing information security. A draft of the documented information security program has been created and will specifically address the cybersecurity requirements of GLBA.
Finding 2024-001: Special Tests and Provisions – Gramm-Leach Bliley Act Repeat of finding 2023-001 Federal Program - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number - 84.033, 84.268, 84.063, 84.379, 84.007 Federal Award Number - Various Federal Award Year - June 30, 2024 Criteria: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. No. 106-102) (GLBA) requires institutions to explain their information-sharing practices to their customers and to safeguard sensitive data (16 CFR 314). In 2021, the Federal Trade Commission issued final regulations that altered the current required elements of an information security program and added several new elements. Under the regulations, institutions are required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that is written in one or more readily accessible parts. The written information security program for institutions must address all elements that apply. The elements for the information security programs set forth in this section 16 CFR 314.4 are high-level principles that set forth basic issues the programs must address, and do not prescribe how they will be addressed. Condition: The University does not have a written information security program that addresses all elements that apply. Cause: The University did not have procedures and processes in place specific to GLBA and therefore, did not have written documentation of all required elements. Effect: Failure to comply with the requirements of GLBA standards puts the University at risk of compromising consumer, nonpublic personal information. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Recommendation: The University should perform and document an annual risk assessment to determine the University's specific risks relevant to protecting consumer nonpublic personal information. At a minimum, the University should address each of the required minimum elements noted in the GLBA regulations (16 CFR 314.4). Management's Response: The reported issue arises from the absence of written documentation outlining policies and procedures related to GLBA requirements. This matter is being addressed by the Director of Information Technology in collaboration with a campus-wide committee responsible for overseeing information security. A draft of the documented information security program has been created and will specifically address the cybersecurity requirements of GLBA.
Finding 2024-001: Special Tests and Provisions – Gramm-Leach Bliley Act Repeat of finding 2023-001 Federal Program - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number - 84.033, 84.268, 84.063, 84.379, 84.007 Federal Award Number - Various Federal Award Year - June 30, 2024 Criteria: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. No. 106-102) (GLBA) requires institutions to explain their information-sharing practices to their customers and to safeguard sensitive data (16 CFR 314). In 2021, the Federal Trade Commission issued final regulations that altered the current required elements of an information security program and added several new elements. Under the regulations, institutions are required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that is written in one or more readily accessible parts. The written information security program for institutions must address all elements that apply. The elements for the information security programs set forth in this section 16 CFR 314.4 are high-level principles that set forth basic issues the programs must address, and do not prescribe how they will be addressed. Condition: The University does not have a written information security program that addresses all elements that apply. Cause: The University did not have procedures and processes in place specific to GLBA and therefore, did not have written documentation of all required elements. Effect: Failure to comply with the requirements of GLBA standards puts the University at risk of compromising consumer, nonpublic personal information. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Recommendation: The University should perform and document an annual risk assessment to determine the University's specific risks relevant to protecting consumer nonpublic personal information. At a minimum, the University should address each of the required minimum elements noted in the GLBA regulations (16 CFR 314.4). Management's Response: The reported issue arises from the absence of written documentation outlining policies and procedures related to GLBA requirements. This matter is being addressed by the Director of Information Technology in collaboration with a campus-wide committee responsible for overseeing information security. A draft of the documented information security program has been created and will specifically address the cybersecurity requirements of GLBA.
Finding 2024-001: Special Tests and Provisions – Gramm-Leach Bliley Act Repeat of finding 2023-001 Federal Program - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number - 84.033, 84.268, 84.063, 84.379, 84.007 Federal Award Number - Various Federal Award Year - June 30, 2024 Criteria: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. No. 106-102) (GLBA) requires institutions to explain their information-sharing practices to their customers and to safeguard sensitive data (16 CFR 314). In 2021, the Federal Trade Commission issued final regulations that altered the current required elements of an information security program and added several new elements. Under the regulations, institutions are required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that is written in one or more readily accessible parts. The written information security program for institutions must address all elements that apply. The elements for the information security programs set forth in this section 16 CFR 314.4 are high-level principles that set forth basic issues the programs must address, and do not prescribe how they will be addressed. Condition: The University does not have a written information security program that addresses all elements that apply. Cause: The University did not have procedures and processes in place specific to GLBA and therefore, did not have written documentation of all required elements. Effect: Failure to comply with the requirements of GLBA standards puts the University at risk of compromising consumer, nonpublic personal information. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Recommendation: The University should perform and document an annual risk assessment to determine the University's specific risks relevant to protecting consumer nonpublic personal information. At a minimum, the University should address each of the required minimum elements noted in the GLBA regulations (16 CFR 314.4). Management's Response: The reported issue arises from the absence of written documentation outlining policies and procedures related to GLBA requirements. This matter is being addressed by the Director of Information Technology in collaboration with a campus-wide committee responsible for overseeing information security. A draft of the documented information security program has been created and will specifically address the cybersecurity requirements of GLBA.
Finding 2024-001: Special Tests and Provisions – Gramm-Leach Bliley Act Repeat of finding 2023-001 Federal Program - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number - 84.033, 84.268, 84.063, 84.379, 84.007 Federal Award Number - Various Federal Award Year - June 30, 2024 Criteria: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. No. 106-102) (GLBA) requires institutions to explain their information-sharing practices to their customers and to safeguard sensitive data (16 CFR 314). In 2021, the Federal Trade Commission issued final regulations that altered the current required elements of an information security program and added several new elements. Under the regulations, institutions are required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that is written in one or more readily accessible parts. The written information security program for institutions must address all elements that apply. The elements for the information security programs set forth in this section 16 CFR 314.4 are high-level principles that set forth basic issues the programs must address, and do not prescribe how they will be addressed. Condition: The University does not have a written information security program that addresses all elements that apply. Cause: The University did not have procedures and processes in place specific to GLBA and therefore, did not have written documentation of all required elements. Effect: Failure to comply with the requirements of GLBA standards puts the University at risk of compromising consumer, nonpublic personal information. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Recommendation: The University should perform and document an annual risk assessment to determine the University's specific risks relevant to protecting consumer nonpublic personal information. At a minimum, the University should address each of the required minimum elements noted in the GLBA regulations (16 CFR 314.4). Management's Response: The reported issue arises from the absence of written documentation outlining policies and procedures related to GLBA requirements. This matter is being addressed by the Director of Information Technology in collaboration with a campus-wide committee responsible for overseeing information security. A draft of the documented information security program has been created and will specifically address the cybersecurity requirements of GLBA.
Finding 2024-001: Special Tests and Provisions – Gramm-Leach Bliley Act Repeat of finding 2023-001 Federal Program - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number - 84.033, 84.268, 84.063, 84.379, 84.007 Federal Award Number - Various Federal Award Year - June 30, 2024 Criteria: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. No. 106-102) (GLBA) requires institutions to explain their information-sharing practices to their customers and to safeguard sensitive data (16 CFR 314). In 2021, the Federal Trade Commission issued final regulations that altered the current required elements of an information security program and added several new elements. Under the regulations, institutions are required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that is written in one or more readily accessible parts. The written information security program for institutions must address all elements that apply. The elements for the information security programs set forth in this section 16 CFR 314.4 are high-level principles that set forth basic issues the programs must address, and do not prescribe how they will be addressed. Condition: The University does not have a written information security program that addresses all elements that apply. Cause: The University did not have procedures and processes in place specific to GLBA and therefore, did not have written documentation of all required elements. Effect: Failure to comply with the requirements of GLBA standards puts the University at risk of compromising consumer, nonpublic personal information. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Recommendation: The University should perform and document an annual risk assessment to determine the University's specific risks relevant to protecting consumer nonpublic personal information. At a minimum, the University should address each of the required minimum elements noted in the GLBA regulations (16 CFR 314.4). Management's Response: The reported issue arises from the absence of written documentation outlining policies and procedures related to GLBA requirements. This matter is being addressed by the Director of Information Technology in collaboration with a campus-wide committee responsible for overseeing information security. A draft of the documented information security program has been created and will specifically address the cybersecurity requirements of GLBA.
Finding 2024-001: Special Tests and Provisions – Gramm-Leach Bliley Act Repeat of finding 2023-001 Federal Program - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number - 84.033, 84.268, 84.063, 84.379, 84.007 Federal Award Number - Various Federal Award Year - June 30, 2024 Criteria: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. No. 106-102) (GLBA) requires institutions to explain their information-sharing practices to their customers and to safeguard sensitive data (16 CFR 314). In 2021, the Federal Trade Commission issued final regulations that altered the current required elements of an information security program and added several new elements. Under the regulations, institutions are required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that is written in one or more readily accessible parts. The written information security program for institutions must address all elements that apply. The elements for the information security programs set forth in this section 16 CFR 314.4 are high-level principles that set forth basic issues the programs must address, and do not prescribe how they will be addressed. Condition: The University does not have a written information security program that addresses all elements that apply. Cause: The University did not have procedures and processes in place specific to GLBA and therefore, did not have written documentation of all required elements. Effect: Failure to comply with the requirements of GLBA standards puts the University at risk of compromising consumer, nonpublic personal information. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Recommendation: The University should perform and document an annual risk assessment to determine the University's specific risks relevant to protecting consumer nonpublic personal information. At a minimum, the University should address each of the required minimum elements noted in the GLBA regulations (16 CFR 314.4). Management's Response: The reported issue arises from the absence of written documentation outlining policies and procedures related to GLBA requirements. This matter is being addressed by the Director of Information Technology in collaboration with a campus-wide committee responsible for overseeing information security. A draft of the documented information security program has been created and will specifically address the cybersecurity requirements of GLBA.
Finding 2024-001: Special Tests and Provisions – Gramm-Leach Bliley Act Repeat of finding 2023-001 Federal Program - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number - 84.033, 84.268, 84.063, 84.379, 84.007 Federal Award Number - Various Federal Award Year - June 30, 2024 Criteria: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. No. 106-102) (GLBA) requires institutions to explain their information-sharing practices to their customers and to safeguard sensitive data (16 CFR 314). In 2021, the Federal Trade Commission issued final regulations that altered the current required elements of an information security program and added several new elements. Under the regulations, institutions are required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that is written in one or more readily accessible parts. The written information security program for institutions must address all elements that apply. The elements for the information security programs set forth in this section 16 CFR 314.4 are high-level principles that set forth basic issues the programs must address, and do not prescribe how they will be addressed. Condition: The University does not have a written information security program that addresses all elements that apply. Cause: The University did not have procedures and processes in place specific to GLBA and therefore, did not have written documentation of all required elements. Effect: Failure to comply with the requirements of GLBA standards puts the University at risk of compromising consumer, nonpublic personal information. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Recommendation: The University should perform and document an annual risk assessment to determine the University's specific risks relevant to protecting consumer nonpublic personal information. At a minimum, the University should address each of the required minimum elements noted in the GLBA regulations (16 CFR 314.4). Management's Response: The reported issue arises from the absence of written documentation outlining policies and procedures related to GLBA requirements. This matter is being addressed by the Director of Information Technology in collaboration with a campus-wide committee responsible for overseeing information security. A draft of the documented information security program has been created and will specifically address the cybersecurity requirements of GLBA.
Finding 2024-001: Special Tests and Provisions – Gramm-Leach Bliley Act Repeat of finding 2023-001 Federal Program - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number - 84.033, 84.268, 84.063, 84.379, 84.007 Federal Award Number - Various Federal Award Year - June 30, 2024 Criteria: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. No. 106-102) (GLBA) requires institutions to explain their information-sharing practices to their customers and to safeguard sensitive data (16 CFR 314). In 2021, the Federal Trade Commission issued final regulations that altered the current required elements of an information security program and added several new elements. Under the regulations, institutions are required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that is written in one or more readily accessible parts. The written information security program for institutions must address all elements that apply. The elements for the information security programs set forth in this section 16 CFR 314.4 are high-level principles that set forth basic issues the programs must address, and do not prescribe how they will be addressed. Condition: The University does not have a written information security program that addresses all elements that apply. Cause: The University did not have procedures and processes in place specific to GLBA and therefore, did not have written documentation of all required elements. Effect: Failure to comply with the requirements of GLBA standards puts the University at risk of compromising consumer, nonpublic personal information. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Recommendation: The University should perform and document an annual risk assessment to determine the University's specific risks relevant to protecting consumer nonpublic personal information. At a minimum, the University should address each of the required minimum elements noted in the GLBA regulations (16 CFR 314.4). Management's Response: The reported issue arises from the absence of written documentation outlining policies and procedures related to GLBA requirements. This matter is being addressed by the Director of Information Technology in collaboration with a campus-wide committee responsible for overseeing information security. A draft of the documented information security program has been created and will specifically address the cybersecurity requirements of GLBA.
Finding 2024-001: Special Tests and Provisions – Gramm-Leach Bliley Act Repeat of finding 2023-001 Federal Program - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity - Not Applicable Assistance Listing Number - 84.033, 84.268, 84.063, 84.379, 84.007 Federal Award Number - Various Federal Award Year - June 30, 2024 Criteria: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. No. 106-102) (GLBA) requires institutions to explain their information-sharing practices to their customers and to safeguard sensitive data (16 CFR 314). In 2021, the Federal Trade Commission issued final regulations that altered the current required elements of an information security program and added several new elements. Under the regulations, institutions are required to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that is written in one or more readily accessible parts. The written information security program for institutions must address all elements that apply. The elements for the information security programs set forth in this section 16 CFR 314.4 are high-level principles that set forth basic issues the programs must address, and do not prescribe how they will be addressed. Condition: The University does not have a written information security program that addresses all elements that apply. Cause: The University did not have procedures and processes in place specific to GLBA and therefore, did not have written documentation of all required elements. Effect: Failure to comply with the requirements of GLBA standards puts the University at risk of compromising consumer, nonpublic personal information. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: Not applicable. Recommendation: The University should perform and document an annual risk assessment to determine the University's specific risks relevant to protecting consumer nonpublic personal information. At a minimum, the University should address each of the required minimum elements noted in the GLBA regulations (16 CFR 314.4). Management's Response: The reported issue arises from the absence of written documentation outlining policies and procedures related to GLBA requirements. This matter is being addressed by the Director of Information Technology in collaboration with a campus-wide committee responsible for overseeing information security. A draft of the documented information security program has been created and will specifically address the cybersecurity requirements of GLBA.