Audit 345296

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.68M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-10

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
526375 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - N
1102817 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
JE6MLG45ZEZ5 Amy Halstead Auditee
3055176613 Brad Hough Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF ACCOUNTING Accounting Policies: ACCOUNTING POLICIES FOR THE NETWORK HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO CONFORM TO THE GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES AS APPLICABLE TO THE VOLUNTARY HEALTH AND WELFARE AGENCIES, INCLUDING THE REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUDITS OF STATES, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND NONPROFIT NETWORKS AND OFFICE MANAGMENT AND UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS COST PRINCIPLES AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL AWARDS. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: THE NETWORK DID NOT USE THE 10 PERCENT DE MINIMUS INDIRECT COST RATE THE ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING IS FOLLOWED IN THE SEFA. MEANING REVENUES ARE RECOGNIZED WHEN EARNED AND EXPENSES ARE RECORDED WHEN A LIABILITY IS INCURRED.
Title: SUBRECIPIENTS Accounting Policies: ACCOUNTING POLICIES FOR THE NETWORK HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO CONFORM TO THE GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES AS APPLICABLE TO THE VOLUNTARY HEALTH AND WELFARE AGENCIES, INCLUDING THE REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUDITS OF STATES, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND NONPROFIT NETWORKS AND OFFICE MANAGMENT AND UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS COST PRINCIPLES AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL AWARDS. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: THE NETWORK DID NOT USE THE 10 PERCENT DE MINIMUS INDIRECT COST RATE NO FUNDS RECEIVED WERE PASSED THROUGH TO SUB-RECIPIENTS.

Finding Details

Criteria: Health centers that receive funding under ALN 93.224 – Health Center Program, are required to prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition: During testing of the application of the Network’s slide scale fees, we noticed that 4 out of 71 testing selections applied a fee that was lower than the slide for which the patient qualified. Cause: In one of the four exceptions, there was an incorrect recording of the patient’s income on the slide determination documentation. The other three exceptions were due to the wrong slide being applied to a patient’s account where the slide-level qualifications had been properly documented. Effect: The pervasiveness and amount of these errors were projected to the entire population resulting in an estimated $1,895 which sliding patients were undercharged. Recommendation: We recommend that the Network implement a more robust review process for information that is input into the billing system. Auditor’s Conclusion: Because the amount of the error is trivial to the major program, this finding does not constitute a material weakness but is a control deficiency that requires attention to strengthen the accuracy of the application of the slide scale fees.
Criteria: Health centers that receive funding under ALN 93.224 – Health Center Program, are required to prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition: During testing of the application of the Network’s slide scale fees, we noticed that 4 out of 71 testing selections applied a fee that was lower than the slide for which the patient qualified. Cause: In one of the four exceptions, there was an incorrect recording of the patient’s income on the slide determination documentation. The other three exceptions were due to the wrong slide being applied to a patient’s account where the slide-level qualifications had been properly documented. Effect: The pervasiveness and amount of these errors were projected to the entire population resulting in an estimated $1,895 which sliding patients were undercharged. Recommendation: We recommend that the Network implement a more robust review process for information that is input into the billing system. Auditor’s Conclusion: Because the amount of the error is trivial to the major program, this finding does not constitute a material weakness but is a control deficiency that requires attention to strengthen the accuracy of the application of the slide scale fees.