Audit 345217

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$3.25M
Findings
4
Programs
2
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-07

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
526303 2024-001 - - M
526304 2024-001 - - M
1102745 2024-001 - - M
1102746 2024-001 - - M

Contacts

Name Title Type
QQ2UGMPE5DN6 Cheri Witt-Brown Auditee
9703516766 Andrea Fuller Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: 1 Accounting Policies: This schedule includes the federal awards activity of Greeley-Weld Habitat for Humanity and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Greeley-Weld Habitat for Humanity generally does utilize the de-minimis method for indirect costs. This schedule includes the federal awards activity of Greeley-Weld Habitat for Humanity and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements.
Title: 2 Accounting Policies: This schedule includes the federal awards activity of Greeley-Weld Habitat for Humanity and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Greeley-Weld Habitat for Humanity generally does utilize the de-minimis method for indirect costs. Greeley-Weld Habitat for Humanity generally does utilize the de-minimis method for indirect costs.
Title: 3 Accounting Policies: This schedule includes the federal awards activity of Greeley-Weld Habitat for Humanity and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Greeley-Weld Habitat for Humanity generally does utilize the de-minimis method for indirect costs. Greeley-Weld Habitat for Humanity has no significant sub-recipients.

Finding Details

Criteria: Suspension and Debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties who are suspended or debarred from federal awards. For certain covered transactions over $25,000, the program must verify that an entity is not suspended or debarred through the System for Award Management (SAM), alternative certification or contract language. Condition: One vendor paid $2,256,379 in program 14.251 and $990,000 in program 21.027 for a total of $3,246,379 was verified using the System for Award Management (SAM) but support was not retained by management. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs as there may be no debarred vendors. Context: Vendors on this project were paid enough federal funds to require the program to verify that the provider is not suspended or debarred. Effect: Amounts may be paid to parties not eligible to receive federal funding. Cause: This purchase was for contract services and Habitat thought that the request for proposal and bid documentation included this language and that the SAM system was checked. Recommendation: We recommend management check the System for Award Management (SAM) or include contract language to ensure federal funds are not paid to suspended or debarred parties. Management’s Response: Agree Contact Person: Cheri Witt-Brown, CEO
Criteria: Suspension and Debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties who are suspended or debarred from federal awards. For certain covered transactions over $25,000, the program must verify that an entity is not suspended or debarred through the System for Award Management (SAM), alternative certification or contract language. Condition: One vendor paid $2,256,379 in program 14.251 and $990,000 in program 21.027 for a total of $3,246,379 was verified using the System for Award Management (SAM) but support was not retained by management. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs as there may be no debarred vendors. Context: Vendors on this project were paid enough federal funds to require the program to verify that the provider is not suspended or debarred. Effect: Amounts may be paid to parties not eligible to receive federal funding. Cause: This purchase was for contract services and Habitat thought that the request for proposal and bid documentation included this language and that the SAM system was checked. Recommendation: We recommend management check the System for Award Management (SAM) or include contract language to ensure federal funds are not paid to suspended or debarred parties. Management’s Response: Agree Contact Person: Cheri Witt-Brown, CEO
Criteria: Suspension and Debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties who are suspended or debarred from federal awards. For certain covered transactions over $25,000, the program must verify that an entity is not suspended or debarred through the System for Award Management (SAM), alternative certification or contract language. Condition: One vendor paid $2,256,379 in program 14.251 and $990,000 in program 21.027 for a total of $3,246,379 was verified using the System for Award Management (SAM) but support was not retained by management. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs as there may be no debarred vendors. Context: Vendors on this project were paid enough federal funds to require the program to verify that the provider is not suspended or debarred. Effect: Amounts may be paid to parties not eligible to receive federal funding. Cause: This purchase was for contract services and Habitat thought that the request for proposal and bid documentation included this language and that the SAM system was checked. Recommendation: We recommend management check the System for Award Management (SAM) or include contract language to ensure federal funds are not paid to suspended or debarred parties. Management’s Response: Agree Contact Person: Cheri Witt-Brown, CEO
Criteria: Suspension and Debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties who are suspended or debarred from federal awards. For certain covered transactions over $25,000, the program must verify that an entity is not suspended or debarred through the System for Award Management (SAM), alternative certification or contract language. Condition: One vendor paid $2,256,379 in program 14.251 and $990,000 in program 21.027 for a total of $3,246,379 was verified using the System for Award Management (SAM) but support was not retained by management. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs as there may be no debarred vendors. Context: Vendors on this project were paid enough federal funds to require the program to verify that the provider is not suspended or debarred. Effect: Amounts may be paid to parties not eligible to receive federal funding. Cause: This purchase was for contract services and Habitat thought that the request for proposal and bid documentation included this language and that the SAM system was checked. Recommendation: We recommend management check the System for Award Management (SAM) or include contract language to ensure federal funds are not paid to suspended or debarred parties. Management’s Response: Agree Contact Person: Cheri Witt-Brown, CEO