Audit 344960

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$3.81M
Findings
4
Programs
26
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
525788 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I
525789 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I
1102230 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I
1102231 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $282,830 - 0
93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance $208,405 - 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $155,984 - 0
93.788 Opioid Str $80,710 - 0
84.027 Special Education Grants to States $79,543 Yes 1
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States $69,318 - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $65,370 - 0
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) $62,132 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $47,817 Yes 0
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $44,799 - 0
84.371 Comprehensive Literacy Development $40,828 - 0
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants $38,759 Yes 0
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $28,774 - 0
15.926 American Battlefield Protection $21,682 - 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program $20,210 - 0
21.029 Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund $16,500 - 0
66.456 National Estuary Program $13,000 - 0
10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program $10,202 - 0
93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse $7,040 - 0
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $6,000 - 0
10.664 Cooperative Forestry Assistance $5,613 - 0
93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services $4,232 - 0
84.184 School Safely National Activities $3,948 - 0
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $1,369 - 0
20.219 Recreational Trails Program $1,056 - 0
45.310 Grants to States $527 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZXEMEG8R1FV8 Maryanne Crawford Auditee
4012471900 Patricia Boucher Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Note 2 De Minimis Rate Used: Both Rate Explanation: Note 3 Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.
Title: NOTE 3 – INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: Note 2 De Minimis Rate Used: Both Rate Explanation: Note 3 The Town of Barrington, Rhode Island has elected to use the de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance for the following programs: • 93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Projects • 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse • 93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services • 93.788 Opioid STR

Finding Details

Criteria: When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended, or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR Section 180.220. The Barrington School Department has a policy in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Condition: During our test of controls over compliance with suspension and debarment requirements, we selected four transactions subject to suspension and debarment requirements that had no documentation on file to support that the School Department verified the entity was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Cause: The School Department did not follow established suspension and debarment policies and procedures. Effect: Contracts for goods and service that were “covered transactions” were entered into prior to verifying that an entity was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the School Department follows established verification procedures to ensure that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded.
Criteria: When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended, or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR Section 180.220. The Barrington School Department has a policy in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Condition: During our test of controls over compliance with suspension and debarment requirements, we selected four transactions subject to suspension and debarment requirements that had no documentation on file to support that the School Department verified the entity was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Cause: The School Department did not follow established suspension and debarment policies and procedures. Effect: Contracts for goods and service that were “covered transactions” were entered into prior to verifying that an entity was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the School Department follows established verification procedures to ensure that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded.
Criteria: When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended, or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR Section 180.220. The Barrington School Department has a policy in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Condition: During our test of controls over compliance with suspension and debarment requirements, we selected four transactions subject to suspension and debarment requirements that had no documentation on file to support that the School Department verified the entity was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Cause: The School Department did not follow established suspension and debarment policies and procedures. Effect: Contracts for goods and service that were “covered transactions” were entered into prior to verifying that an entity was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the School Department follows established verification procedures to ensure that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded.
Criteria: When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended, or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR Section 180.220. The Barrington School Department has a policy in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Condition: During our test of controls over compliance with suspension and debarment requirements, we selected four transactions subject to suspension and debarment requirements that had no documentation on file to support that the School Department verified the entity was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Cause: The School Department did not follow established suspension and debarment policies and procedures. Effect: Contracts for goods and service that were “covered transactions” were entered into prior to verifying that an entity was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the School Department follows established verification procedures to ensure that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded.