Audit 34472

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$10.73M
Findings
4
Programs
4
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-06-25

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
30537 2022-001 Material Weakness - B
30538 2022-002 Material Weakness - L
606979 2022-001 Material Weakness - B
606980 2022-002 Material Weakness - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
JCYWB9P24E43 Connie Stewart Auditee
8286926175 Dale R. Rector Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Loan/loan guarantee outstanding balances Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. MORTGAGE INSURANCE FOR THE PURCHASE OR REFINANCING OF EXISTING MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROJECTS (14.155) - Balances outstanding at the end of the audit period were 9167872.
Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Authority under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Authority.
Title: SUBRECIPIENTS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The Authority provided no federal awards to subrecipients during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2022.
Title: DISCLOSURE OF OTHER FORMS OF ASSISTANCE Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. ?The Hendersonville Housing Authority received no federal awards of non-monetary assistance that are required to be disclosed for the year ended September 30, 2022.?The Hendersonville Housing Authority had loans outstanding of $9,167,872, which were guaranteed, and therefore, qualify as part of the federal financial assistance. This loan is disclosed in the Notes to the Financial Statements.?The Hendersonville Housing Authority maintains the following limits of insurance as of September 30, 2022:Property $50,000,000General Liability$ 5,000,000Commercial Auto$ 5,000,000Employee Bond$5,000,000Worker Compensation StatutoryFinance Officer Bond$100,000Settled claims have not exceeded the above commercial insurance coverage limits over the past three years.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-001 ? Allowable Costs/Costs Principles ? Ineligible Wire Transfer ALN 14.182 Section 8 New Construction, Noncompliance & Material Weakness Criteria: Title 2, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, states that the entity should ?establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award and provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes.? This requirement also specifies that type of payments allowed and the controls over those payments. Condition & Cause: We noted that the client entered $351,532 on the Unaudited Financial Data Schedule into line 97500 Fraud Losses. We inquired into the nature of this account and it came to our attention that the client was the victim of wire fraud during FY 2022. The previous Executive Director was sent a fictitious email under the guise of their RAD conversion vendor Gibraltar Construction. The client had never previously wired this vendor payment and failed to verify the authenticity of this disbursement. Due to this it has been concluded that the client will likely not recover this amount. The previous Executive Director has since retired. Effect: Poor internal controls over wire transfers can result in a significant loss of funds which are restricted by both Federal and State regulations. Recommendation: We recommend that the Housing Authority implement better controls over wire transfers and ACH banking procedures. Typically, when changes to payment method are requested over email, the Housing Authority should have alternative means to identify the legitimacy of the instructions and the transaction. Questioned Costs: $351,532 Repeat Finding: No Views of responsible officials: The PHA agrees with the results of the audit and recommendation.
Finding 2022-002 ? Accounting Controls ? Timeliness of Financial Statement Preparation ALN 14.182 Section 8 New Construction, Noncompliance & Material Weakness Criteria: Regulations at 24 CFR Part 5 describe the reporting requirements for Housing Authority?s that are recipients of Section 8 project-based housing grants. PHA?s that serve as contract administrators for the funding must submit financial information to HUD within sixty (60) days of the end of the reporting period. Condition & Cause: We noted that the client did not submit the Unaudited Financial Data Schedule to HUD within sixty days of the reporting period?s end date. The unaudited FDS was submitted May 8, 2023, into the HUD REAC online system with an original due date of November 30, 2022. This is largely due to staff turnover and other unexpected circumstances. Effect: Non-compliance and reporting deficiencies of the entity financial statements. Recommendation: We recommend that the Housing Authority review HUD reporting guidelines and submit these reports in a timely fashion. Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: No Views of responsible officials: The PHA agrees with the results of the audit and recommendation.
Finding 2022-001 ? Allowable Costs/Costs Principles ? Ineligible Wire Transfer ALN 14.182 Section 8 New Construction, Noncompliance & Material Weakness Criteria: Title 2, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, states that the entity should ?establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award and provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes.? This requirement also specifies that type of payments allowed and the controls over those payments. Condition & Cause: We noted that the client entered $351,532 on the Unaudited Financial Data Schedule into line 97500 Fraud Losses. We inquired into the nature of this account and it came to our attention that the client was the victim of wire fraud during FY 2022. The previous Executive Director was sent a fictitious email under the guise of their RAD conversion vendor Gibraltar Construction. The client had never previously wired this vendor payment and failed to verify the authenticity of this disbursement. Due to this it has been concluded that the client will likely not recover this amount. The previous Executive Director has since retired. Effect: Poor internal controls over wire transfers can result in a significant loss of funds which are restricted by both Federal and State regulations. Recommendation: We recommend that the Housing Authority implement better controls over wire transfers and ACH banking procedures. Typically, when changes to payment method are requested over email, the Housing Authority should have alternative means to identify the legitimacy of the instructions and the transaction. Questioned Costs: $351,532 Repeat Finding: No Views of responsible officials: The PHA agrees with the results of the audit and recommendation.
Finding 2022-002 ? Accounting Controls ? Timeliness of Financial Statement Preparation ALN 14.182 Section 8 New Construction, Noncompliance & Material Weakness Criteria: Regulations at 24 CFR Part 5 describe the reporting requirements for Housing Authority?s that are recipients of Section 8 project-based housing grants. PHA?s that serve as contract administrators for the funding must submit financial information to HUD within sixty (60) days of the end of the reporting period. Condition & Cause: We noted that the client did not submit the Unaudited Financial Data Schedule to HUD within sixty days of the reporting period?s end date. The unaudited FDS was submitted May 8, 2023, into the HUD REAC online system with an original due date of November 30, 2022. This is largely due to staff turnover and other unexpected circumstances. Effect: Non-compliance and reporting deficiencies of the entity financial statements. Recommendation: We recommend that the Housing Authority review HUD reporting guidelines and submit these reports in a timely fashion. Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: No Views of responsible officials: The PHA agrees with the results of the audit and recommendation.