Audit 344697

FY End
2024-09-30
Total Expended
$791,181
Findings
4
Programs
5
Organization: River Network (CO)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-04
Auditor: Artesian CPA LLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
525596 2024-001 Material Weakness - I
525597 2024-001 Material Weakness - I
1102038 2024-001 Material Weakness - I
1102039 2024-001 Material Weakness - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
TC6AS52CPMR5 Barbara Long Auditee
7204656962 Robert Cascio Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of River Network (the “Organization”), under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2024 in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administration Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization. Basis of Accounting Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance; wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed are limited as to reimbursement. Indirect Cost Rate The Organization not elected to use the 10 or 15-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The entity used the cost rates as prescribed in the individual grant agreements..

Finding Details

Finding 2024-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment 15.954 National Park Service Conservation, Protection, Outreach, and Education and 10.727 Inflation Reduction Act Urban and Community Forestry Program. Criteria: A recipient of federal awards is required to ensure that contractors and subrecipients are checked against the debarment list and ensure there are controls in place over procurement per 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition and Context: The Organization did not check a contractor and a subrecipient against the debarment list. The Organization did not have a formally documented or enacted process in place to ensure all procurement requirements were completed accurately and timely. And there was also no underlying supporting documentation showing that subrecipients and contractors were checked against the debarment list. Cause: The Organization was not aware that contractors and subrecipients needed to be checked against the debarment list. Effect or Potential Effect: Without sufficient documentation, the Organization may have contracted with an Organization that was debarred. The related review of debarment was not documented. Without sufficient documentation and monitoring controls, the Organization may not be able to detect an error in procurement timely. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization update their policies and procedures manual to ensure testing contractors and subrecipients to the debarment list when expenses reach federal limits. Responsible Official’s Response: Management agrees with the recommendation to establish and follow a documented internal control process over the review of procurement. Staff will work with management to ensure that subrecipients and contractors with expenses over federal limits will be tested against the debarment list. Additionally, staff members working in areas concerning this process will be trained to ensure process adherence.
Finding 2024-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment 15.954 National Park Service Conservation, Protection, Outreach, and Education and 10.727 Inflation Reduction Act Urban and Community Forestry Program. Criteria: A recipient of federal awards is required to ensure that contractors and subrecipients are checked against the debarment list and ensure there are controls in place over procurement per 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition and Context: The Organization did not check a contractor and a subrecipient against the debarment list. The Organization did not have a formally documented or enacted process in place to ensure all procurement requirements were completed accurately and timely. And there was also no underlying supporting documentation showing that subrecipients and contractors were checked against the debarment list. Cause: The Organization was not aware that contractors and subrecipients needed to be checked against the debarment list. Effect or Potential Effect: Without sufficient documentation, the Organization may have contracted with an Organization that was debarred. The related review of debarment was not documented. Without sufficient documentation and monitoring controls, the Organization may not be able to detect an error in procurement timely. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization update their policies and procedures manual to ensure testing contractors and subrecipients to the debarment list when expenses reach federal limits. Responsible Official’s Response: Management agrees with the recommendation to establish and follow a documented internal control process over the review of procurement. Staff will work with management to ensure that subrecipients and contractors with expenses over federal limits will be tested against the debarment list. Additionally, staff members working in areas concerning this process will be trained to ensure process adherence.
Finding 2024-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment 15.954 National Park Service Conservation, Protection, Outreach, and Education and 10.727 Inflation Reduction Act Urban and Community Forestry Program. Criteria: A recipient of federal awards is required to ensure that contractors and subrecipients are checked against the debarment list and ensure there are controls in place over procurement per 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition and Context: The Organization did not check a contractor and a subrecipient against the debarment list. The Organization did not have a formally documented or enacted process in place to ensure all procurement requirements were completed accurately and timely. And there was also no underlying supporting documentation showing that subrecipients and contractors were checked against the debarment list. Cause: The Organization was not aware that contractors and subrecipients needed to be checked against the debarment list. Effect or Potential Effect: Without sufficient documentation, the Organization may have contracted with an Organization that was debarred. The related review of debarment was not documented. Without sufficient documentation and monitoring controls, the Organization may not be able to detect an error in procurement timely. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization update their policies and procedures manual to ensure testing contractors and subrecipients to the debarment list when expenses reach federal limits. Responsible Official’s Response: Management agrees with the recommendation to establish and follow a documented internal control process over the review of procurement. Staff will work with management to ensure that subrecipients and contractors with expenses over federal limits will be tested against the debarment list. Additionally, staff members working in areas concerning this process will be trained to ensure process adherence.
Finding 2024-001 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment 15.954 National Park Service Conservation, Protection, Outreach, and Education and 10.727 Inflation Reduction Act Urban and Community Forestry Program. Criteria: A recipient of federal awards is required to ensure that contractors and subrecipients are checked against the debarment list and ensure there are controls in place over procurement per 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition and Context: The Organization did not check a contractor and a subrecipient against the debarment list. The Organization did not have a formally documented or enacted process in place to ensure all procurement requirements were completed accurately and timely. And there was also no underlying supporting documentation showing that subrecipients and contractors were checked against the debarment list. Cause: The Organization was not aware that contractors and subrecipients needed to be checked against the debarment list. Effect or Potential Effect: Without sufficient documentation, the Organization may have contracted with an Organization that was debarred. The related review of debarment was not documented. Without sufficient documentation and monitoring controls, the Organization may not be able to detect an error in procurement timely. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization update their policies and procedures manual to ensure testing contractors and subrecipients to the debarment list when expenses reach federal limits. Responsible Official’s Response: Management agrees with the recommendation to establish and follow a documented internal control process over the review of procurement. Staff will work with management to ensure that subrecipients and contractors with expenses over federal limits will be tested against the debarment list. Additionally, staff members working in areas concerning this process will be trained to ensure process adherence.