Audit 344645

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$4.03M
Findings
8
Programs
7
Organization: North Central Michigan College (MI)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-04

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
525564 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - B
525565 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - B
525566 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - B
525567 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - B
1102006 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - B
1102007 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - B
1102008 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - B
1102009 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - B

Programs

Contacts

Name Title Type
P7D7XAUF4QE4 Troy Slater Auditee
2313486610 Joshua Sullivan Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: PASS-THROUGH AGENCIES Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal grant activity of North Central Michigan College (the "College") under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the College, it is not intended to and does not present the net position, changes in net position or cash flows of the College. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 1 to the College's financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance or other applicable guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: For purposes of charging indirect costs to federal awards, the College has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as permitted by §200.414 of the Uniform Guidance. The College receives certain federal grants as subawards from non-federal entities. Pass-through entities, where applicable, have been identified in the Schedule with an abbreviation, defined as follows: "See Notes to SEFA for table."

Finding Details

Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance/Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Allowable Costs/Cost Principles). Program. Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027; Award Number SLFRP0127. Criteria. Any non-Federal entity that does not have a current negotiated rate may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs ("MTDC"). Condition. The College does not have a negotiated rate, however, they used a rate other than the de minimis rate of 10% in their calculation of indirect costs. The College also did not use the MTDC for purposes of this calculation, but instead used the budgeted indirect cost total for the program. Cause. The College does not have a review process in place to ensure indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. Effect. As a result of this condition, the College over-charged the grant by $21,765 during 2024. Questioned Costs. Questioned costs totaled $21,765 as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the College implement a review process to ensure that the indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance/Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Allowable Costs/Cost Principles). Program. Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027; Award Number SLFRP0127. Criteria. Any non-Federal entity that does not have a current negotiated rate may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs ("MTDC"). Condition. The College does not have a negotiated rate, however, they used a rate other than the de minimis rate of 10% in their calculation of indirect costs. The College also did not use the MTDC for purposes of this calculation, but instead used the budgeted indirect cost total for the program. Cause. The College does not have a review process in place to ensure indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. Effect. As a result of this condition, the College over-charged the grant by $21,765 during 2024. Questioned Costs. Questioned costs totaled $21,765 as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the College implement a review process to ensure that the indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance/Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Allowable Costs/Cost Principles). Program. Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027; Award Number SLFRP0127. Criteria. Any non-Federal entity that does not have a current negotiated rate may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs ("MTDC"). Condition. The College does not have a negotiated rate, however, they used a rate other than the de minimis rate of 10% in their calculation of indirect costs. The College also did not use the MTDC for purposes of this calculation, but instead used the budgeted indirect cost total for the program. Cause. The College does not have a review process in place to ensure indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. Effect. As a result of this condition, the College over-charged the grant by $21,765 during 2024. Questioned Costs. Questioned costs totaled $21,765 as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the College implement a review process to ensure that the indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance/Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Allowable Costs/Cost Principles). Program. Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027; Award Number SLFRP0127. Criteria. Any non-Federal entity that does not have a current negotiated rate may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs ("MTDC"). Condition. The College does not have a negotiated rate, however, they used a rate other than the de minimis rate of 10% in their calculation of indirect costs. The College also did not use the MTDC for purposes of this calculation, but instead used the budgeted indirect cost total for the program. Cause. The College does not have a review process in place to ensure indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. Effect. As a result of this condition, the College over-charged the grant by $21,765 during 2024. Questioned Costs. Questioned costs totaled $21,765 as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the College implement a review process to ensure that the indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance/Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Allowable Costs/Cost Principles). Program. Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027; Award Number SLFRP0127. Criteria. Any non-Federal entity that does not have a current negotiated rate may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs ("MTDC"). Condition. The College does not have a negotiated rate, however, they used a rate other than the de minimis rate of 10% in their calculation of indirect costs. The College also did not use the MTDC for purposes of this calculation, but instead used the budgeted indirect cost total for the program. Cause. The College does not have a review process in place to ensure indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. Effect. As a result of this condition, the College over-charged the grant by $21,765 during 2024. Questioned Costs. Questioned costs totaled $21,765 as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the College implement a review process to ensure that the indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance/Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Allowable Costs/Cost Principles). Program. Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027; Award Number SLFRP0127. Criteria. Any non-Federal entity that does not have a current negotiated rate may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs ("MTDC"). Condition. The College does not have a negotiated rate, however, they used a rate other than the de minimis rate of 10% in their calculation of indirect costs. The College also did not use the MTDC for purposes of this calculation, but instead used the budgeted indirect cost total for the program. Cause. The College does not have a review process in place to ensure indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. Effect. As a result of this condition, the College over-charged the grant by $21,765 during 2024. Questioned Costs. Questioned costs totaled $21,765 as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the College implement a review process to ensure that the indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance/Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Allowable Costs/Cost Principles). Program. Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027; Award Number SLFRP0127. Criteria. Any non-Federal entity that does not have a current negotiated rate may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs ("MTDC"). Condition. The College does not have a negotiated rate, however, they used a rate other than the de minimis rate of 10% in their calculation of indirect costs. The College also did not use the MTDC for purposes of this calculation, but instead used the budgeted indirect cost total for the program. Cause. The College does not have a review process in place to ensure indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. Effect. As a result of this condition, the College over-charged the grant by $21,765 during 2024. Questioned Costs. Questioned costs totaled $21,765 as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the College implement a review process to ensure that the indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance/Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Allowable Costs/Cost Principles). Program. Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds; U.S. Department of Treasury; Assistance Listing Number 21.027; Award Number SLFRP0127. Criteria. Any non-Federal entity that does not have a current negotiated rate may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs ("MTDC"). Condition. The College does not have a negotiated rate, however, they used a rate other than the de minimis rate of 10% in their calculation of indirect costs. The College also did not use the MTDC for purposes of this calculation, but instead used the budgeted indirect cost total for the program. Cause. The College does not have a review process in place to ensure indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. Effect. As a result of this condition, the College over-charged the grant by $21,765 during 2024. Questioned Costs. Questioned costs totaled $21,765 as a result of this finding. Recommendation. We recommend that the College implement a review process to ensure that the indirect costs charged to the grant are in accordance with the grant award letter. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.