Return of Title IV (R2T4) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.063 Federal Pell Grants and 84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans
Federal Award Identification #: 2023-2024 Award Year
Condition: When students withdrew either officially or unofficially, the College did not always return unearned Title IV aid timely. Additionally, the College did not always calculate the R2T4 correctly.
Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22
Questioned Costs: $441
Context: Out of 25 students, 1 student who withdrew during the audit period tested had funds returned 6 days late. Additionally, this student’s R2T4 was not properly calculated. The College did not adjust the student’s Pell grant based on courses the student began attendance in before completing the R2T4. This error resulted in $441 in Pell grant funds that need to be returned to the Department of Education.
Cause: The R2T4 calculation error was due to oversight by management when processing the R2T4 because the student changed enrollment level several times before the R2T4 was processed. This also caused the return to be processed late.
Effect: Noncompliance with R2T4 regulations.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend an individual in financial aid with the appropriate level of experience periodically review R2T4 calculations and returns to help ensure that internal controls over such process can operate effectively and achieve compliance.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Return of Title IV (R2T4) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.063 Federal Pell Grants and 84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans
Federal Award Identification #: 2023-2024 Award Year
Condition: When students withdrew either officially or unofficially, the College did not always return unearned Title IV aid timely. Additionally, the College did not always calculate the R2T4 correctly.
Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22
Questioned Costs: $441
Context: Out of 25 students, 1 student who withdrew during the audit period tested had funds returned 6 days late. Additionally, this student’s R2T4 was not properly calculated. The College did not adjust the student’s Pell grant based on courses the student began attendance in before completing the R2T4. This error resulted in $441 in Pell grant funds that need to be returned to the Department of Education.
Cause: The R2T4 calculation error was due to oversight by management when processing the R2T4 because the student changed enrollment level several times before the R2T4 was processed. This also caused the return to be processed late.
Effect: Noncompliance with R2T4 regulations.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend an individual in financial aid with the appropriate level of experience periodically review R2T4 calculations and returns to help ensure that internal controls over such process can operate effectively and achieve compliance.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Compliance DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, and 84.033 Student Financial Assistance Cluster
Federal Award Identification #: 2023-2024 Award Year
Condition: The College did not sufficiently comply with all of the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $0
Context: The College has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, including general threats, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The College prioritized certain aspects of GLBA during the year with two components remaining.
Effect: The College has two gaps to fully address the requirements of GLBA, which if not adressed may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the College allocate sufficient resources to address the remaining requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Compliance DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, and 84.033 Student Financial Assistance Cluster
Federal Award Identification #: 2023-2024 Award Year
Condition: The College did not sufficiently comply with all of the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $0
Context: The College has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, including general threats, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The College prioritized certain aspects of GLBA during the year with two components remaining.
Effect: The College has two gaps to fully address the requirements of GLBA, which if not adressed may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the College allocate sufficient resources to address the remaining requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Compliance DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, and 84.033 Student Financial Assistance Cluster
Federal Award Identification #: 2023-2024 Award Year
Condition: The College did not sufficiently comply with all of the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $0
Context: The College has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, including general threats, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The College prioritized certain aspects of GLBA during the year with two components remaining.
Effect: The College has two gaps to fully address the requirements of GLBA, which if not adressed may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the College allocate sufficient resources to address the remaining requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Compliance DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, and 84.033 Student Financial Assistance Cluster
Federal Award Identification #: 2023-2024 Award Year
Condition: The College did not sufficiently comply with all of the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $0
Context: The College has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, including general threats, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The College prioritized certain aspects of GLBA during the year with two components remaining.
Effect: The College has two gaps to fully address the requirements of GLBA, which if not adressed may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the College allocate sufficient resources to address the remaining requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Return of Title IV (R2T4) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.063 Federal Pell Grants and 84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans
Federal Award Identification #: 2023-2024 Award Year
Condition: When students withdrew either officially or unofficially, the College did not always return unearned Title IV aid timely. Additionally, the College did not always calculate the R2T4 correctly.
Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22
Questioned Costs: $441
Context: Out of 25 students, 1 student who withdrew during the audit period tested had funds returned 6 days late. Additionally, this student’s R2T4 was not properly calculated. The College did not adjust the student’s Pell grant based on courses the student began attendance in before completing the R2T4. This error resulted in $441 in Pell grant funds that need to be returned to the Department of Education.
Cause: The R2T4 calculation error was due to oversight by management when processing the R2T4 because the student changed enrollment level several times before the R2T4 was processed. This also caused the return to be processed late.
Effect: Noncompliance with R2T4 regulations.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend an individual in financial aid with the appropriate level of experience periodically review R2T4 calculations and returns to help ensure that internal controls over such process can operate effectively and achieve compliance.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Return of Title IV (R2T4) Significant Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.063 Federal Pell Grants and 84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans
Federal Award Identification #: 2023-2024 Award Year
Condition: When students withdrew either officially or unofficially, the College did not always return unearned Title IV aid timely. Additionally, the College did not always calculate the R2T4 correctly.
Criteria: 34 CFR 668.22
Questioned Costs: $441
Context: Out of 25 students, 1 student who withdrew during the audit period tested had funds returned 6 days late. Additionally, this student’s R2T4 was not properly calculated. The College did not adjust the student’s Pell grant based on courses the student began attendance in before completing the R2T4. This error resulted in $441 in Pell grant funds that need to be returned to the Department of Education.
Cause: The R2T4 calculation error was due to oversight by management when processing the R2T4 because the student changed enrollment level several times before the R2T4 was processed. This also caused the return to be processed late.
Effect: Noncompliance with R2T4 regulations.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend an individual in financial aid with the appropriate level of experience periodically review R2T4 calculations and returns to help ensure that internal controls over such process can operate effectively and achieve compliance.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Compliance DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, and 84.033 Student Financial Assistance Cluster
Federal Award Identification #: 2023-2024 Award Year
Condition: The College did not sufficiently comply with all of the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $0
Context: The College has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, including general threats, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The College prioritized certain aspects of GLBA during the year with two components remaining.
Effect: The College has two gaps to fully address the requirements of GLBA, which if not adressed may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the College allocate sufficient resources to address the remaining requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Compliance DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, and 84.033 Student Financial Assistance Cluster
Federal Award Identification #: 2023-2024 Award Year
Condition: The College did not sufficiently comply with all of the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $0
Context: The College has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, including general threats, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The College prioritized certain aspects of GLBA during the year with two components remaining.
Effect: The College has two gaps to fully address the requirements of GLBA, which if not adressed may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the College allocate sufficient resources to address the remaining requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Compliance DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, and 84.033 Student Financial Assistance Cluster
Federal Award Identification #: 2023-2024 Award Year
Condition: The College did not sufficiently comply with all of the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $0
Context: The College has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, including general threats, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The College prioritized certain aspects of GLBA during the year with two components remaining.
Effect: The College has two gaps to fully address the requirements of GLBA, which if not adressed may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the College allocate sufficient resources to address the remaining requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Compliance DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALN #: 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, and 84.033 Student Financial Assistance Cluster
Federal Award Identification #: 2023-2024 Award Year
Condition: The College did not sufficiently comply with all of the updated requirements of GLBA.
Criteria: 16 CFR 314.4
Questioned Costs: $0
Context: The College has not sufficiently documented its security risk assessment and safeguards, including general threats, or provided a written, annual report to the board.
Cause: The College prioritized certain aspects of GLBA during the year with two components remaining.
Effect: The College has two gaps to fully address the requirements of GLBA, which if not adressed may lead to unintended exposure of student information to security risks.
Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not applicable.
Recommendation: We recommend the College allocate sufficient resources to address the remaining requirements of GLBA.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.