Audit 34453

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.46M
Findings
2
Programs
6
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
37204 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - H
613646 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - H

Contacts

Name Title Type
MLUJX2C5BXZ7 April Ramsey Auditee
6157805901 Christian Bennett Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards (the Schedule) includes the federal and state grant activity of the Organization under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: Payments to Subrecipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. There were no payments made to subrecipients during the year ended June 30, 2022.

Finding Details

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Block Grant for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Assistance Listing No. 93.959) Pass-Through Entity-Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Period of Availability Criteria: When submitting reimbursement requests to grantor agencies the entity should ensure that all costs have been incurred during the period of availability of the related grant. Condition: The Organization controls related to invoice review did not identify that the period of performance for an invoice was prior to the period of availability of the grant it was charged to. As a result reimbursements were requested for an expense that is not covered by the grant?s period of availability in the grant agreement. Cause: The cause of this was due to an oversight of management when reviewing the invoice for approval. It was noted that the Organization does not typically receive invoice billing for quarterly expenses due to the nature of operations. As a result, reviewing an invoice for its period of performance is not a process that is required often and as a result an error during the review and booking of this expense occurred. Effects: Due to the expense being recorded in the incorrect fiscal year it was then partially allocated to the grant and subsequently requested for reimbursement. This resulted in an instance of noncompliance due to the expense being incurred prior to the period of availability for the grant. Questioned Costs: The questioned cost of allocated portion of this invoice to the grant was $1,326. Context: This was the only instance noted in testing and appears to be an isolated instance. No further sampling occurred and this error in the sample was extrapolated to the entire population resulting in an expected misstatement of $7,463. Recommendation: We recommend that management review invoices received near fiscal year end with an extra level of scrutiny to ensure that the invoice is being booked to the correct period as determined by the period of performance. Views of Responsible Officials: We will ensure all covered transactions are properly reviewed for the period of performance. We will also ensure they are recorded and subsequently requested for reimbursement in the proper period.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Block Grant for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Assistance Listing No. 93.959) Pass-Through Entity-Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Period of Availability Criteria: When submitting reimbursement requests to grantor agencies the entity should ensure that all costs have been incurred during the period of availability of the related grant. Condition: The Organization controls related to invoice review did not identify that the period of performance for an invoice was prior to the period of availability of the grant it was charged to. As a result reimbursements were requested for an expense that is not covered by the grant?s period of availability in the grant agreement. Cause: The cause of this was due to an oversight of management when reviewing the invoice for approval. It was noted that the Organization does not typically receive invoice billing for quarterly expenses due to the nature of operations. As a result, reviewing an invoice for its period of performance is not a process that is required often and as a result an error during the review and booking of this expense occurred. Effects: Due to the expense being recorded in the incorrect fiscal year it was then partially allocated to the grant and subsequently requested for reimbursement. This resulted in an instance of noncompliance due to the expense being incurred prior to the period of availability for the grant. Questioned Costs: The questioned cost of allocated portion of this invoice to the grant was $1,326. Context: This was the only instance noted in testing and appears to be an isolated instance. No further sampling occurred and this error in the sample was extrapolated to the entire population resulting in an expected misstatement of $7,463. Recommendation: We recommend that management review invoices received near fiscal year end with an extra level of scrutiny to ensure that the invoice is being booked to the correct period as determined by the period of performance. Views of Responsible Officials: We will ensure all covered transactions are properly reviewed for the period of performance. We will also ensure they are recorded and subsequently requested for reimbursement in the proper period.