Audit 344288

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$36.91M
Findings
16
Programs
22
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-02-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
524939 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes N
524940 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes N
524941 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes N
524942 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes N
524943 2024-002 Material Weakness - N
524944 2024-002 Material Weakness - N
524945 2024-002 Material Weakness - N
524946 2024-002 Material Weakness - N
1101381 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1101382 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1101383 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1101384 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1101385 2024-002 Material Weakness - N
1101386 2024-002 Material Weakness - N
1101387 2024-002 Material Weakness - N
1101388 2024-002 Material Weakness - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
FN1HX3UK9SX1 Jeff Hinshaw Auditee
3106500566 Liezl Malabanan Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the District under programs of the federal government for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the District. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the full accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The District uses an indirect cost rate, approved by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The District did not use the 10-percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District did not use the 10-percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

2024 – 001: Return of Title IV Funds Testing Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(a)(1), when a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student’s withdrawal date. In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(b) and (d)(4),the institution must return those funds for which it is responsible under paragraph (a) of this section to the respective title IV, HEA program as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. An institution does not satisfy this requirement if— (i) The institution's records show that the check was issued more than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance; or (ii) The date on the cancelled check shows that the bank used by the Secretary or FFEL Program lender endorsed that check more than 45 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. Condition: It was noted during our testing of R2T4 calculations that 17 of 40 students selected for R2T4 testing had an instance of non-compliance. Specifically, 12 students had excess returns totaling $2,404; one of those students also should have received a post-withdrawal disbursement of $124; three students had under returns of $22; and one student's return was not received within the 45-day time limit. Questioned Costs: Excess returns exceeded under returns and missed post-withdrawal disbursement. Accordingly, there are not net questioned costs. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted below instances for R2T4 testing: - 1 of the 40 total students' Pell was not returned within the 45 days requirement due to human error. - 16 of the 40 total students' R2T4 was incorrectly calculated. Cause: The District does not have proper second review in place to ensure student awards are properly adjusted based on calculations performed. Effect: The District is not returning the proper amounts to the Department based on the calculations performed. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the District review the R2T4 requirements and implement procedures to ensure award adjustments as determined by the R2T4 calculations are being properly adjusted to the student’s account and the correct amounts are being returned to the Department. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 001: Return of Title IV Funds Testing Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(a)(1), when a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student’s withdrawal date. In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(b) and (d)(4),the institution must return those funds for which it is responsible under paragraph (a) of this section to the respective title IV, HEA program as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. An institution does not satisfy this requirement if— (i) The institution's records show that the check was issued more than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance; or (ii) The date on the cancelled check shows that the bank used by the Secretary or FFEL Program lender endorsed that check more than 45 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. Condition: It was noted during our testing of R2T4 calculations that 17 of 40 students selected for R2T4 testing had an instance of non-compliance. Specifically, 12 students had excess returns totaling $2,404; one of those students also should have received a post-withdrawal disbursement of $124; three students had under returns of $22; and one student's return was not received within the 45-day time limit. Questioned Costs: Excess returns exceeded under returns and missed post-withdrawal disbursement. Accordingly, there are not net questioned costs. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted below instances for R2T4 testing: - 1 of the 40 total students' Pell was not returned within the 45 days requirement due to human error. - 16 of the 40 total students' R2T4 was incorrectly calculated. Cause: The District does not have proper second review in place to ensure student awards are properly adjusted based on calculations performed. Effect: The District is not returning the proper amounts to the Department based on the calculations performed. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the District review the R2T4 requirements and implement procedures to ensure award adjustments as determined by the R2T4 calculations are being properly adjusted to the student’s account and the correct amounts are being returned to the Department. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 001: Return of Title IV Funds Testing Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(a)(1), when a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student’s withdrawal date. In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(b) and (d)(4),the institution must return those funds for which it is responsible under paragraph (a) of this section to the respective title IV, HEA program as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. An institution does not satisfy this requirement if— (i) The institution's records show that the check was issued more than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance; or (ii) The date on the cancelled check shows that the bank used by the Secretary or FFEL Program lender endorsed that check more than 45 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. Condition: It was noted during our testing of R2T4 calculations that 17 of 40 students selected for R2T4 testing had an instance of non-compliance. Specifically, 12 students had excess returns totaling $2,404; one of those students also should have received a post-withdrawal disbursement of $124; three students had under returns of $22; and one student's return was not received within the 45-day time limit. Questioned Costs: Excess returns exceeded under returns and missed post-withdrawal disbursement. Accordingly, there are not net questioned costs. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted below instances for R2T4 testing: - 1 of the 40 total students' Pell was not returned within the 45 days requirement due to human error. - 16 of the 40 total students' R2T4 was incorrectly calculated. Cause: The District does not have proper second review in place to ensure student awards are properly adjusted based on calculations performed. Effect: The District is not returning the proper amounts to the Department based on the calculations performed. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the District review the R2T4 requirements and implement procedures to ensure award adjustments as determined by the R2T4 calculations are being properly adjusted to the student’s account and the correct amounts are being returned to the Department. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 001: Return of Title IV Funds Testing Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(a)(1), when a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student’s withdrawal date. In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(b) and (d)(4),the institution must return those funds for which it is responsible under paragraph (a) of this section to the respective title IV, HEA program as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. An institution does not satisfy this requirement if— (i) The institution's records show that the check was issued more than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance; or (ii) The date on the cancelled check shows that the bank used by the Secretary or FFEL Program lender endorsed that check more than 45 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. Condition: It was noted during our testing of R2T4 calculations that 17 of 40 students selected for R2T4 testing had an instance of non-compliance. Specifically, 12 students had excess returns totaling $2,404; one of those students also should have received a post-withdrawal disbursement of $124; three students had under returns of $22; and one student's return was not received within the 45-day time limit. Questioned Costs: Excess returns exceeded under returns and missed post-withdrawal disbursement. Accordingly, there are not net questioned costs. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted below instances for R2T4 testing: - 1 of the 40 total students' Pell was not returned within the 45 days requirement due to human error. - 16 of the 40 total students' R2T4 was incorrectly calculated. Cause: The District does not have proper second review in place to ensure student awards are properly adjusted based on calculations performed. Effect: The District is not returning the proper amounts to the Department based on the calculations performed. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the District review the R2T4 requirements and implement procedures to ensure award adjustments as determined by the R2T4 calculations are being properly adjusted to the student’s account and the correct amounts are being returned to the Department. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 002: NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 685.309(b) and the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Guide published by the Department of Education, schools must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website. In addition, schools must report enrollment status changes within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change or in its next scheduled enrollment submission if the scheduled submission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing of 40 students, which is a statistically valid sample, we noted nine instances of late reporting of student status changes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted nine instances of noncompliance. Cause: The District's internal controls did not identify the errors for compliance with the criteria mentioned above. Effect: Inaccurate information is reflected on the NSLDS database. A student’s enrollment data protects the rights of borrowers by ensuring that loan interest subsidies are based on accurate enrollment data, ensures loan repayment dates are accurately based on the last data of attendance, allows in-school deferments to be automatically granted using NSLDS enrollment data, and provides vast amounts of critical data about the effectiveness of Title IV aid programs, including completion data. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its reporting procedures to ensure that enrollment and program information is accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 002: NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 685.309(b) and the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Guide published by the Department of Education, schools must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website. In addition, schools must report enrollment status changes within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change or in its next scheduled enrollment submission if the scheduled submission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing of 40 students, which is a statistically valid sample, we noted nine instances of late reporting of student status changes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted nine instances of noncompliance. Cause: The District's internal controls did not identify the errors for compliance with the criteria mentioned above. Effect: Inaccurate information is reflected on the NSLDS database. A student’s enrollment data protects the rights of borrowers by ensuring that loan interest subsidies are based on accurate enrollment data, ensures loan repayment dates are accurately based on the last data of attendance, allows in-school deferments to be automatically granted using NSLDS enrollment data, and provides vast amounts of critical data about the effectiveness of Title IV aid programs, including completion data. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its reporting procedures to ensure that enrollment and program information is accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 002: NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 685.309(b) and the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Guide published by the Department of Education, schools must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website. In addition, schools must report enrollment status changes within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change or in its next scheduled enrollment submission if the scheduled submission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing of 40 students, which is a statistically valid sample, we noted nine instances of late reporting of student status changes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted nine instances of noncompliance. Cause: The District's internal controls did not identify the errors for compliance with the criteria mentioned above. Effect: Inaccurate information is reflected on the NSLDS database. A student’s enrollment data protects the rights of borrowers by ensuring that loan interest subsidies are based on accurate enrollment data, ensures loan repayment dates are accurately based on the last data of attendance, allows in-school deferments to be automatically granted using NSLDS enrollment data, and provides vast amounts of critical data about the effectiveness of Title IV aid programs, including completion data. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its reporting procedures to ensure that enrollment and program information is accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 002: NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 685.309(b) and the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Guide published by the Department of Education, schools must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website. In addition, schools must report enrollment status changes within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change or in its next scheduled enrollment submission if the scheduled submission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing of 40 students, which is a statistically valid sample, we noted nine instances of late reporting of student status changes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted nine instances of noncompliance. Cause: The District's internal controls did not identify the errors for compliance with the criteria mentioned above. Effect: Inaccurate information is reflected on the NSLDS database. A student’s enrollment data protects the rights of borrowers by ensuring that loan interest subsidies are based on accurate enrollment data, ensures loan repayment dates are accurately based on the last data of attendance, allows in-school deferments to be automatically granted using NSLDS enrollment data, and provides vast amounts of critical data about the effectiveness of Title IV aid programs, including completion data. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its reporting procedures to ensure that enrollment and program information is accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 001: Return of Title IV Funds Testing Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(a)(1), when a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student’s withdrawal date. In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(b) and (d)(4),the institution must return those funds for which it is responsible under paragraph (a) of this section to the respective title IV, HEA program as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. An institution does not satisfy this requirement if— (i) The institution's records show that the check was issued more than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance; or (ii) The date on the cancelled check shows that the bank used by the Secretary or FFEL Program lender endorsed that check more than 45 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. Condition: It was noted during our testing of R2T4 calculations that 17 of 40 students selected for R2T4 testing had an instance of non-compliance. Specifically, 12 students had excess returns totaling $2,404; one of those students also should have received a post-withdrawal disbursement of $124; three students had under returns of $22; and one student's return was not received within the 45-day time limit. Questioned Costs: Excess returns exceeded under returns and missed post-withdrawal disbursement. Accordingly, there are not net questioned costs. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted below instances for R2T4 testing: - 1 of the 40 total students' Pell was not returned within the 45 days requirement due to human error. - 16 of the 40 total students' R2T4 was incorrectly calculated. Cause: The District does not have proper second review in place to ensure student awards are properly adjusted based on calculations performed. Effect: The District is not returning the proper amounts to the Department based on the calculations performed. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the District review the R2T4 requirements and implement procedures to ensure award adjustments as determined by the R2T4 calculations are being properly adjusted to the student’s account and the correct amounts are being returned to the Department. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 001: Return of Title IV Funds Testing Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(a)(1), when a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student’s withdrawal date. In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(b) and (d)(4),the institution must return those funds for which it is responsible under paragraph (a) of this section to the respective title IV, HEA program as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. An institution does not satisfy this requirement if— (i) The institution's records show that the check was issued more than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance; or (ii) The date on the cancelled check shows that the bank used by the Secretary or FFEL Program lender endorsed that check more than 45 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. Condition: It was noted during our testing of R2T4 calculations that 17 of 40 students selected for R2T4 testing had an instance of non-compliance. Specifically, 12 students had excess returns totaling $2,404; one of those students also should have received a post-withdrawal disbursement of $124; three students had under returns of $22; and one student's return was not received within the 45-day time limit. Questioned Costs: Excess returns exceeded under returns and missed post-withdrawal disbursement. Accordingly, there are not net questioned costs. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted below instances for R2T4 testing: - 1 of the 40 total students' Pell was not returned within the 45 days requirement due to human error. - 16 of the 40 total students' R2T4 was incorrectly calculated. Cause: The District does not have proper second review in place to ensure student awards are properly adjusted based on calculations performed. Effect: The District is not returning the proper amounts to the Department based on the calculations performed. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the District review the R2T4 requirements and implement procedures to ensure award adjustments as determined by the R2T4 calculations are being properly adjusted to the student’s account and the correct amounts are being returned to the Department. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 001: Return of Title IV Funds Testing Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(a)(1), when a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student’s withdrawal date. In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(b) and (d)(4),the institution must return those funds for which it is responsible under paragraph (a) of this section to the respective title IV, HEA program as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. An institution does not satisfy this requirement if— (i) The institution's records show that the check was issued more than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance; or (ii) The date on the cancelled check shows that the bank used by the Secretary or FFEL Program lender endorsed that check more than 45 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. Condition: It was noted during our testing of R2T4 calculations that 17 of 40 students selected for R2T4 testing had an instance of non-compliance. Specifically, 12 students had excess returns totaling $2,404; one of those students also should have received a post-withdrawal disbursement of $124; three students had under returns of $22; and one student's return was not received within the 45-day time limit. Questioned Costs: Excess returns exceeded under returns and missed post-withdrawal disbursement. Accordingly, there are not net questioned costs. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted below instances for R2T4 testing: - 1 of the 40 total students' Pell was not returned within the 45 days requirement due to human error. - 16 of the 40 total students' R2T4 was incorrectly calculated. Cause: The District does not have proper second review in place to ensure student awards are properly adjusted based on calculations performed. Effect: The District is not returning the proper amounts to the Department based on the calculations performed. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the District review the R2T4 requirements and implement procedures to ensure award adjustments as determined by the R2T4 calculations are being properly adjusted to the student’s account and the correct amounts are being returned to the Department. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 001: Return of Title IV Funds Testing Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(a)(1), when a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student’s withdrawal date. In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(b) and (d)(4),the institution must return those funds for which it is responsible under paragraph (a) of this section to the respective title IV, HEA program as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. An institution does not satisfy this requirement if— (i) The institution's records show that the check was issued more than 30 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance; or (ii) The date on the cancelled check shows that the bank used by the Secretary or FFEL Program lender endorsed that check more than 45 days after the date that the institution becomes aware that the student will not or has not begun attendance. Condition: It was noted during our testing of R2T4 calculations that 17 of 40 students selected for R2T4 testing had an instance of non-compliance. Specifically, 12 students had excess returns totaling $2,404; one of those students also should have received a post-withdrawal disbursement of $124; three students had under returns of $22; and one student's return was not received within the 45-day time limit. Questioned Costs: Excess returns exceeded under returns and missed post-withdrawal disbursement. Accordingly, there are not net questioned costs. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted below instances for R2T4 testing: - 1 of the 40 total students' Pell was not returned within the 45 days requirement due to human error. - 16 of the 40 total students' R2T4 was incorrectly calculated. Cause: The District does not have proper second review in place to ensure student awards are properly adjusted based on calculations performed. Effect: The District is not returning the proper amounts to the Department based on the calculations performed. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the District review the R2T4 requirements and implement procedures to ensure award adjustments as determined by the R2T4 calculations are being properly adjusted to the student’s account and the correct amounts are being returned to the Department. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 002: NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 685.309(b) and the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Guide published by the Department of Education, schools must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website. In addition, schools must report enrollment status changes within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change or in its next scheduled enrollment submission if the scheduled submission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing of 40 students, which is a statistically valid sample, we noted nine instances of late reporting of student status changes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted nine instances of noncompliance. Cause: The District's internal controls did not identify the errors for compliance with the criteria mentioned above. Effect: Inaccurate information is reflected on the NSLDS database. A student’s enrollment data protects the rights of borrowers by ensuring that loan interest subsidies are based on accurate enrollment data, ensures loan repayment dates are accurately based on the last data of attendance, allows in-school deferments to be automatically granted using NSLDS enrollment data, and provides vast amounts of critical data about the effectiveness of Title IV aid programs, including completion data. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its reporting procedures to ensure that enrollment and program information is accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 002: NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 685.309(b) and the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Guide published by the Department of Education, schools must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website. In addition, schools must report enrollment status changes within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change or in its next scheduled enrollment submission if the scheduled submission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing of 40 students, which is a statistically valid sample, we noted nine instances of late reporting of student status changes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted nine instances of noncompliance. Cause: The District's internal controls did not identify the errors for compliance with the criteria mentioned above. Effect: Inaccurate information is reflected on the NSLDS database. A student’s enrollment data protects the rights of borrowers by ensuring that loan interest subsidies are based on accurate enrollment data, ensures loan repayment dates are accurately based on the last data of attendance, allows in-school deferments to be automatically granted using NSLDS enrollment data, and provides vast amounts of critical data about the effectiveness of Title IV aid programs, including completion data. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its reporting procedures to ensure that enrollment and program information is accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 002: NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 685.309(b) and the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Guide published by the Department of Education, schools must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website. In addition, schools must report enrollment status changes within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change or in its next scheduled enrollment submission if the scheduled submission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing of 40 students, which is a statistically valid sample, we noted nine instances of late reporting of student status changes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted nine instances of noncompliance. Cause: The District's internal controls did not identify the errors for compliance with the criteria mentioned above. Effect: Inaccurate information is reflected on the NSLDS database. A student’s enrollment data protects the rights of borrowers by ensuring that loan interest subsidies are based on accurate enrollment data, ensures loan repayment dates are accurately based on the last data of attendance, allows in-school deferments to be automatically granted using NSLDS enrollment data, and provides vast amounts of critical data about the effectiveness of Title IV aid programs, including completion data. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its reporting procedures to ensure that enrollment and program information is accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.
2024 – 002: NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Federal Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various - 2024 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 685.309(b) and the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Guide published by the Department of Education, schools must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website. In addition, schools must report enrollment status changes within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change or in its next scheduled enrollment submission if the scheduled submission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing of 40 students, which is a statistically valid sample, we noted nine instances of late reporting of student status changes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our audit procedures, we noted nine instances of noncompliance. Cause: The District's internal controls did not identify the errors for compliance with the criteria mentioned above. Effect: Inaccurate information is reflected on the NSLDS database. A student’s enrollment data protects the rights of borrowers by ensuring that loan interest subsidies are based on accurate enrollment data, ensures loan repayment dates are accurately based on the last data of attendance, allows in-school deferments to be automatically granted using NSLDS enrollment data, and provides vast amounts of critical data about the effectiveness of Title IV aid programs, including completion data. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its reporting procedures to ensure that enrollment and program information is accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding.