Audit 343890

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$6.94M
Findings
4
Programs
7
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-02-26

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
524507 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
524508 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
1100949 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1100950 2024-002 Material Weakness - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
QN2CQ2JKXDR7 Karen Long Auditee
5413702761 Hani Morcos Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: LOANS OUTSTANDING Accounting Policies: BASIS OF PRESENTATION - The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Columbia Cascade Housing Corporation (the Organization) under programs of federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operation of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the OMB Circular A-122 and Uniform Guidance. The Organization did not elect to use the 10 percent de minims indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization did not elect to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. At June 30, 2024, Organization had the following loan balances outstanding. The loan balances are also included in the federal expenditures. Program or Cluster Title : Rural Rental Housing Loan; Federal Assistance Listing Number : 10.415; Amount Outstanding: $4,607,889.

Finding Details

Assisted Listing Number/Federal Program/Granting Agency: 10.415 Criteria: The Organization must have adequate controls over replacement reserve in place to ensure accurate and timely deposits are executed to the reserve accounts. Statement of Condition: As part of our review of replacement reserve accounts required by RD, we noted there were 3 properties, Carson Springs, White Caps, and Wy East, which were inadequately funding RD required replacement reserve accounts during the year. The RD properties Carson Springs, White Caps, and Wy East were underfunded by $9,100, $11,500, and $16,034, respectively during 2024. Questioned Costs: It is not practicable to estimate questioned costs. Cause: Management failed to request abatement of RD replacement reserve deposits for three properties. Two of the properties (Carson Springs and White Caps) made no deposits during the year, and one property, Wy East Vista, only had 5 deposits during the year. The failure to request abatement or decrease in the reserve deposits resulted in underfunded RD replacement reserves. Effect or Possible Effect and Perspective: The replacement reserve accounts are underfunded for 3 of the properties (Carson Springs, White Caps, and Wy East), properties are out of compliance with RD replacement reserve account required deposits. The replacement reserves may not have sufficient funds to maintain repair costs. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization request from RD an a reduction in deposit amounts for properties struggling for cash, or an entire pause of deposits. We recommend the Organization receive approval from RD prior to reducing or stopping any RD replacement reserve deposits. Views of Responsible Officials: Paula Maden, agrees, via the corrective action plan.
Assisted Listing Number/Federal Program/Granting Agency: 14.251 Economic Development Initiative Criteria: The Organization must have adequate controls in place over compliance with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Statement of Condition: As part of our review of the Economic Development program, we noted there were no suspension and debarment tests performed on any vendors, and no procurement process performed during the selection of the architect. Questioned Costs: It is not practicable to estimate questioned costs. Cause: The Organization relied on developer for compliance with requirements, the developer did not have a procurement policy and was not aware of compliance requirements related to suspension and debarment. Effect or Possible Effect and Perspective: Vendors could be suspended or debarred. The Organization did not comply with procurement requirements in the selection of the architect. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization review all compliance requirements with the Economic Development Initiative grant program themselves and not rely on developer to ensure all compliance requirements are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials: Paula Maden, agrees, via the corrective action plan.
Assisted Listing Number/Federal Program/Granting Agency: 10.415 Criteria: The Organization must have adequate controls over replacement reserve in place to ensure accurate and timely deposits are executed to the reserve accounts. Statement of Condition: As part of our review of replacement reserve accounts required by RD, we noted there were 3 properties, Carson Springs, White Caps, and Wy East, which were inadequately funding RD required replacement reserve accounts during the year. The RD properties Carson Springs, White Caps, and Wy East were underfunded by $9,100, $11,500, and $16,034, respectively during 2024. Questioned Costs: It is not practicable to estimate questioned costs. Cause: Management failed to request abatement of RD replacement reserve deposits for three properties. Two of the properties (Carson Springs and White Caps) made no deposits during the year, and one property, Wy East Vista, only had 5 deposits during the year. The failure to request abatement or decrease in the reserve deposits resulted in underfunded RD replacement reserves. Effect or Possible Effect and Perspective: The replacement reserve accounts are underfunded for 3 of the properties (Carson Springs, White Caps, and Wy East), properties are out of compliance with RD replacement reserve account required deposits. The replacement reserves may not have sufficient funds to maintain repair costs. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization request from RD an a reduction in deposit amounts for properties struggling for cash, or an entire pause of deposits. We recommend the Organization receive approval from RD prior to reducing or stopping any RD replacement reserve deposits. Views of Responsible Officials: Paula Maden, agrees, via the corrective action plan.
Assisted Listing Number/Federal Program/Granting Agency: 14.251 Economic Development Initiative Criteria: The Organization must have adequate controls in place over compliance with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Statement of Condition: As part of our review of the Economic Development program, we noted there were no suspension and debarment tests performed on any vendors, and no procurement process performed during the selection of the architect. Questioned Costs: It is not practicable to estimate questioned costs. Cause: The Organization relied on developer for compliance with requirements, the developer did not have a procurement policy and was not aware of compliance requirements related to suspension and debarment. Effect or Possible Effect and Perspective: Vendors could be suspended or debarred. The Organization did not comply with procurement requirements in the selection of the architect. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization review all compliance requirements with the Economic Development Initiative grant program themselves and not rely on developer to ensure all compliance requirements are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials: Paula Maden, agrees, via the corrective action plan.