Audit 342622

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$1.22M
Findings
4
Programs
7
Organization: Choice in Aging (CA)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2025-02-14
Auditor: Brymar CPA LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
523340 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - B
523341 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - B
1099782 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - B
1099783 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - B

Contacts

Name Title Type
UR9WBUWNLJT3 Debbie Toth Auditee
9256826343 Sandy Martinez-Bulosan Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1 - Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: The schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of the Organization and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Therefore, some amounts presented in the schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of Choice in Aging (the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information relating to the federal awards is presented in accordance wit the requirements of title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Choice in Aging, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets of Choice in Aging.
Title: Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: The schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of the Organization and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Therefore, some amounts presented in the schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient.
Title: Note 3 - Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: The schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of the Organization and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Therefore, some amounts presented in the schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The Organization has not elected to use the 10% de minimus cost rate.

Finding Details

Finding 2023-02: Allowable Costs: Payroll – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 93.778—Medical Assistance Program, Medicaid Cluster, United States Department Health and Human Services. Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Aging. Award Numbers: MS-2223-47 and MS-2223-56. Criteria: Management is responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules, and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the Organization’s federal programs. Condition: We identified two inconsistencies in controls related to payroll processes. Cause: The condition occurred primarily because of having either an ineffective or no monthly and year-end control activity designed and implemented to verify payroll information was properly recorded and approved. Effect: Amounts recorded in payroll may be unauthorized or inaccurate. Without a properly designed process and review controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud could occur and not be detected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We tested one hundred percent of payroll costs for four employees. In one out of the four employees selected for testing, proper approval for employee pay raise was not documented. In addition, for another one of the four employees tested, the employee record was not timely deactivated upon employment termination. Recommendation: We recommend management implement a termination checklist that the payroll administrator completes for each terminated employee before the next payroll is processed. The deactivation of employee record in the payroll system should be one of the steps on the checklist. Additionally, we recommend that all pay raise letters have proper documented approval before being processed in the payroll system. Views of Responsible Official: See next page
Finding 2023-02: Allowable Costs: Payroll – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 93.778—Medical Assistance Program, Medicaid Cluster, United States Department Health and Human Services. Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Aging. Award Numbers: MS-2223-47 and MS-2223-56. Criteria: Management is responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules, and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the Organization’s federal programs. Condition: We identified two inconsistencies in controls related to payroll processes. Cause: The condition occurred primarily because of having either an ineffective or no monthly and year-end control activity designed and implemented to verify payroll information was properly recorded and approved. Effect: Amounts recorded in payroll may be unauthorized or inaccurate. Without a properly designed process and review controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud could occur and not be detected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We tested one hundred percent of payroll costs for four employees. In one out of the four employees selected for testing, proper approval for employee pay raise was not documented. In addition, for another one of the four employees tested, the employee record was not timely deactivated upon employment termination. Recommendation: We recommend management implement a termination checklist that the payroll administrator completes for each terminated employee before the next payroll is processed. The deactivation of employee record in the payroll system should be one of the steps on the checklist. Additionally, we recommend that all pay raise letters have proper documented approval before being processed in the payroll system. Views of Responsible Official: See next page
Finding 2023-02: Allowable Costs: Payroll – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 93.778—Medical Assistance Program, Medicaid Cluster, United States Department Health and Human Services. Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Aging. Award Numbers: MS-2223-47 and MS-2223-56. Criteria: Management is responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules, and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the Organization’s federal programs. Condition: We identified two inconsistencies in controls related to payroll processes. Cause: The condition occurred primarily because of having either an ineffective or no monthly and year-end control activity designed and implemented to verify payroll information was properly recorded and approved. Effect: Amounts recorded in payroll may be unauthorized or inaccurate. Without a properly designed process and review controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud could occur and not be detected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We tested one hundred percent of payroll costs for four employees. In one out of the four employees selected for testing, proper approval for employee pay raise was not documented. In addition, for another one of the four employees tested, the employee record was not timely deactivated upon employment termination. Recommendation: We recommend management implement a termination checklist that the payroll administrator completes for each terminated employee before the next payroll is processed. The deactivation of employee record in the payroll system should be one of the steps on the checklist. Additionally, we recommend that all pay raise letters have proper documented approval before being processed in the payroll system. Views of Responsible Official: See next page
Finding 2023-02: Allowable Costs: Payroll – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 93.778—Medical Assistance Program, Medicaid Cluster, United States Department Health and Human Services. Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Aging. Award Numbers: MS-2223-47 and MS-2223-56. Criteria: Management is responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules, and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the Organization’s federal programs. Condition: We identified two inconsistencies in controls related to payroll processes. Cause: The condition occurred primarily because of having either an ineffective or no monthly and year-end control activity designed and implemented to verify payroll information was properly recorded and approved. Effect: Amounts recorded in payroll may be unauthorized or inaccurate. Without a properly designed process and review controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud could occur and not be detected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We tested one hundred percent of payroll costs for four employees. In one out of the four employees selected for testing, proper approval for employee pay raise was not documented. In addition, for another one of the four employees tested, the employee record was not timely deactivated upon employment termination. Recommendation: We recommend management implement a termination checklist that the payroll administrator completes for each terminated employee before the next payroll is processed. The deactivation of employee record in the payroll system should be one of the steps on the checklist. Additionally, we recommend that all pay raise letters have proper documented approval before being processed in the payroll system. Views of Responsible Official: See next page