Audit 342432

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$2.24M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-02-13

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
523131 2024-001 - Yes A
1099573 2024-001 - Yes A

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.850 Public Housing Operating Fund $1.19M Yes 1
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $912,133 Yes 0
14.870 Resident Opportunity and Supportive Services - Service Coordinators $143,541 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
M48RLFG2ULT1 Niakeya Cooper Auditee
9107384866 Laura Bailey Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) includes the federal grant activity of the Authority under the programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this SEFA is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of the Authority.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported in the SEFA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Authority has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Loans Outstanding Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Authority has no loans outstanding with compliance requirements at year end.

Finding Details

Statement of Condition – For the Low Rent Public Housing program, we reviewed 40 tenant files (recertification files and new tenant files) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. We reviewed 5 files for tenants who moved out during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. The selected files represent a sample of all tenant files in the two AMPS. We noted 6 instances in which tenant rent was calculated incorrectly. In 2 of these instances, the tenant rent was capped and the tenants were not paying the full amount calculated, 2 instances in which current social security benefits were not used, resulting in underpayments of tenant rent, 1 instance in which net social security benefits were used to calculate tenant income, resulting in underpayment of tenant rent, and 1 instance in which the medical allowance was calculated incorrectly, resulting in underpayments of tenant rent. Criteria – Per the Public Housing Occupancy Guidebook: 1. Section 3, a family’s portion of rent is determined based on annual income. There are no “ceiling caps” in place for family rents calculated below the unit’s set “flat rent” amount. 2. Section 8.2.2, “PHAs must use HUD’s verification hierarchy when verifying the family’s income, assets, deductions, and expenses…Enterprise Income Verification (EIV) is mandatory (i.e. must review EIV Income Report for all families when verifying income)”. 3. Section 3.9, “The gross amount of social security benefit income, prior to Medicare or other deductions, must be counted as income…”. 4. Section 6.4, medical expenses are expenses “anticipated to be incurred … which are not covered by outside sources, such as insurance”. Effect – For the files referenced above: 1. Tenant rent was incorrectly capped, resulting in an underpayment of $25 per month. 2. Prior year information was used, resulting in an underpayment of $91 per month. 3. Net social security benefits were used to calculate tenant income, resulting in an underpayment of $19 per month. 4. Out-of-pocket medical costs were calculated incorrectly, resulting in an underpayment in tenant rent of $200 per month. Cause – Incorrect procedures were followed in regards to calculating tenant income. Recommendation – Procedures surrounding tenant rent calculation processes should be strengthened. Information should be reviewed to ensure ceiling caps are not in place. Identification of a repeat finding – This is a repeat finding in the current year. Views of responsible officials and corrective action plans – The Authority agrees with this finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan on page 58.
Statement of Condition – For the Low Rent Public Housing program, we reviewed 40 tenant files (recertification files and new tenant files) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. We reviewed 5 files for tenants who moved out during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. The selected files represent a sample of all tenant files in the two AMPS. We noted 6 instances in which tenant rent was calculated incorrectly. In 2 of these instances, the tenant rent was capped and the tenants were not paying the full amount calculated, 2 instances in which current social security benefits were not used, resulting in underpayments of tenant rent, 1 instance in which net social security benefits were used to calculate tenant income, resulting in underpayment of tenant rent, and 1 instance in which the medical allowance was calculated incorrectly, resulting in underpayments of tenant rent. Criteria – Per the Public Housing Occupancy Guidebook: 1. Section 3, a family’s portion of rent is determined based on annual income. There are no “ceiling caps” in place for family rents calculated below the unit’s set “flat rent” amount. 2. Section 8.2.2, “PHAs must use HUD’s verification hierarchy when verifying the family’s income, assets, deductions, and expenses…Enterprise Income Verification (EIV) is mandatory (i.e. must review EIV Income Report for all families when verifying income)”. 3. Section 3.9, “The gross amount of social security benefit income, prior to Medicare or other deductions, must be counted as income…”. 4. Section 6.4, medical expenses are expenses “anticipated to be incurred … which are not covered by outside sources, such as insurance”. Effect – For the files referenced above: 1. Tenant rent was incorrectly capped, resulting in an underpayment of $25 per month. 2. Prior year information was used, resulting in an underpayment of $91 per month. 3. Net social security benefits were used to calculate tenant income, resulting in an underpayment of $19 per month. 4. Out-of-pocket medical costs were calculated incorrectly, resulting in an underpayment in tenant rent of $200 per month. Cause – Incorrect procedures were followed in regards to calculating tenant income. Recommendation – Procedures surrounding tenant rent calculation processes should be strengthened. Information should be reviewed to ensure ceiling caps are not in place. Identification of a repeat finding – This is a repeat finding in the current year. Views of responsible officials and corrective action plans – The Authority agrees with this finding. Please refer to the corrective action plan on page 58.